The beginning of ChatGPT – a systematic and bibliometric review of the literature

IF 1.6 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Hasnan Baber, Kiran Nair, Ruchi Gupta, Kuldeep Gurjar
{"title":"The beginning of ChatGPT – a systematic and bibliometric review of the literature","authors":"Hasnan Baber, Kiran Nair, Ruchi Gupta, Kuldeep Gurjar","doi":"10.1108/ils-04-2023-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This paper aims to present a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of research papers published on chat generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT), an OpenAI-developed large-scale generative language model. The study’s objective is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the present status of research on ChatGPT and identify current trends and themes in the literature. Design/methodology/approach A total of 328 research article data was extracted from Scopus for bibliometric analysis, to investigate publishing trends, productive countries and keyword analysis around the topic and 34 relevant research publications were selected for an in-depth systematic literature review. Findings The findings indicate that ChatGPT research is still in its early stages, with the current emphasis on applications such as natural language processing and understanding, dialogue systems, speech processing and recognition, learning systems, chatbots and response generation. The USA is at the forefront of publishing on this topic and new keywords, e.g. “patient care”, “medical”, “higher education” and so on are emerging themes around the topic. Research limitations/implications These findings underscore the importance of ongoing research and development to address these limitations and ensure that ChatGPT is used responsibly and ethically. While systematic review research on ChatGPT heralds exciting opportunities, it also demands a careful understanding of its nuances to harness its potential effectively. Originality/value Overall, this study provides a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners interested in ChatGPT at this early stage and helps to identify the grey areas around this topic.","PeriodicalId":44588,"journal":{"name":"Information and Learning Sciences","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-04-2023-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to present a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of research papers published on chat generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT), an OpenAI-developed large-scale generative language model. The study’s objective is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the present status of research on ChatGPT and identify current trends and themes in the literature. Design/methodology/approach A total of 328 research article data was extracted from Scopus for bibliometric analysis, to investigate publishing trends, productive countries and keyword analysis around the topic and 34 relevant research publications were selected for an in-depth systematic literature review. Findings The findings indicate that ChatGPT research is still in its early stages, with the current emphasis on applications such as natural language processing and understanding, dialogue systems, speech processing and recognition, learning systems, chatbots and response generation. The USA is at the forefront of publishing on this topic and new keywords, e.g. “patient care”, “medical”, “higher education” and so on are emerging themes around the topic. Research limitations/implications These findings underscore the importance of ongoing research and development to address these limitations and ensure that ChatGPT is used responsibly and ethically. While systematic review research on ChatGPT heralds exciting opportunities, it also demands a careful understanding of its nuances to harness its potential effectively. Originality/value Overall, this study provides a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners interested in ChatGPT at this early stage and helps to identify the grey areas around this topic.
聊天GPT 的开端--文献的系统性和文献计量学回顾
目的 本文旨在对有关聊天生成预训练转换器(ChatGPT)的研究论文进行系统的文献综述和文献计量分析,聊天生成预训练转换器是 OpenAI 开发的大规模生成语言模型。本研究的目的是对 ChatGPT 的研究现状进行全面评估,并确定文献中的当前趋势和主题。 设计/方法/途径 从 Scopus 中提取了共计 328 篇研究文章数据进行文献计量分析,以调查出版趋势、生产国和围绕该主题的关键词分析,并选择了 34 篇相关研究出版物进行深入系统的文献综述。 研究结果 研究结果表明,ChatGPT 研究仍处于早期阶段,目前的重点是自然语言处理和理解、对话系统、语音处理和识别、学习系统、聊天机器人和回复生成等应用。美国在这一主题的出版方面走在前列,"病人护理"、"医疗"、"高等教育 "等新关键词成为围绕这一主题的新兴主题。 研究局限性/意义 这些发现强调了持续研究和开发的重要性,以解决这些局限性并确保以负责任和符合道德的方式使用 ChatGPT。关于 ChatGPT 的系统性综述研究预示着令人兴奋的机遇,但同时也要求仔细了解其细微差别,以有效利用其潜力。 原创性/价值 总体而言,本研究为早期阶段对 ChatGPT 感兴趣的研究人员和从业人员提供了宝贵的资源,并有助于识别围绕该主题的灰色地带。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information and Learning Sciences
Information and Learning Sciences INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Information and Learning Sciences advances inter-disciplinary research that explores scholarly intersections shared within 2 key fields: information science and the learning sciences / education sciences. The journal provides a publication venue for work that strengthens our scholarly understanding of human inquiry and learning phenomena, especially as they relate to design and uses of information and e-learning systems innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信