Prevalence of road traffic accidents during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Kavous Shahsavarinia, H. Salehi-pourmehr, H. Zafardoust, Sepideh Harzand-Jadidi, Robabeh Mehdipour, N. Kabiri
{"title":"Prevalence of road traffic accidents during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Kavous Shahsavarinia, H. Salehi-pourmehr, H. Zafardoust, Sepideh Harzand-Jadidi, Robabeh Mehdipour, N. Kabiri","doi":"10.34172/jrcm.2023.33386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: At the beginning of the novel coronavirus disease COVID-19 pandemic, many countries around the world closed their centers and imposed restrictions on urban and interurban traffic. This situation had a significant impact on the occurrence of road traffic accidents. The present systematic review aimed to determine the prevalence of road accidents during the COVID-19 implemented lockdowns. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) instructions. Two independent reviewers screened articles based on the inclusion criteria for the review and eligible studies for methodological quality using an appropriate appraisal checklist based on the study type. The statistical analysis was performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software. Considering the heterogeneity among studies, a random effect model was adopted to estimate the pooled effect with 95% CI for binary outcomes. Results: The initial search of databases yielded 849 potentially relevant articles, of which, 44 studies were included in this systematic review and of them, 36 were considered for metaanalysis. The random effect model showed an overall prevalence of injury before the lockdown of 24.9% (95% confidence interval: 20.0%-30.5%). Also, the prevalence of injury during the COVID-19 lockdown was 18.8% (95% CI: 14.7%-23.6%). Begg and Mazumdar’s correlation found no publication bias in the meta-analysis. Conclusion: Road traffic injuries, as one of the main causes of death worldwide, took on a new face with the advent of COVID-19. We have found that there is a relatively high prevalence of road traffic accidents before COVID-19 compared to pandemic period.","PeriodicalId":17071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Clinical Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jrcm.2023.33386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: At the beginning of the novel coronavirus disease COVID-19 pandemic, many countries around the world closed their centers and imposed restrictions on urban and interurban traffic. This situation had a significant impact on the occurrence of road traffic accidents. The present systematic review aimed to determine the prevalence of road accidents during the COVID-19 implemented lockdowns. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) instructions. Two independent reviewers screened articles based on the inclusion criteria for the review and eligible studies for methodological quality using an appropriate appraisal checklist based on the study type. The statistical analysis was performed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software. Considering the heterogeneity among studies, a random effect model was adopted to estimate the pooled effect with 95% CI for binary outcomes. Results: The initial search of databases yielded 849 potentially relevant articles, of which, 44 studies were included in this systematic review and of them, 36 were considered for metaanalysis. The random effect model showed an overall prevalence of injury before the lockdown of 24.9% (95% confidence interval: 20.0%-30.5%). Also, the prevalence of injury during the COVID-19 lockdown was 18.8% (95% CI: 14.7%-23.6%). Begg and Mazumdar’s correlation found no publication bias in the meta-analysis. Conclusion: Road traffic injuries, as one of the main causes of death worldwide, took on a new face with the advent of COVID-19. We have found that there is a relatively high prevalence of road traffic accidents before COVID-19 compared to pandemic period.
COVID-19 大流行期间道路交通事故的发生率:系统回顾和荟萃分析
导言:在新型冠状病毒疾病 COVID-19 流行之初,世界上许多国家都关闭了市中心,并对城市和城市间交通实行了限制。这种情况对道路交通事故的发生产生了重大影响。本系统综述旨在确定在 COVID-19 实施封锁期间道路交通事故的发生率。方法:本系统综述和荟萃分析是根据乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(JBI)的指示进行的。两名独立审稿人根据综述的纳入标准筛选文章,并根据研究类型使用适当的评估清单对符合条件的研究进行方法学质量评估。统计分析采用综合荟萃分析(CMA)软件进行。考虑到各研究之间的异质性,采用随机效应模型来估计二元结果的集合效应及 95% CI。结果通过对数据库的初步检索,共获得了 849 篇潜在的相关文章,其中 44 项研究被纳入了本系统综述,并对其中的 36 项研究进行了荟萃分析。随机效应模型显示,封锁前受伤的总体发生率为 24.9%(95% 置信区间:20.0%-30.5%)。此外,COVID-19 封锁期间的受伤率为 18.8%(95% 置信区间:14.7%-23.6%)。Begg 和 Mazumdar 的相关研究发现荟萃分析中没有发表偏差。结论道路交通伤害是导致全球死亡的主要原因之一,随着 COVID-19 的出现,道路交通伤害的面貌焕然一新。我们发现,与大流行时期相比,COVID-19 之前的道路交通事故发生率相对较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信