From Šulgi to Abraham: Encounters with Ur in the First Millennium BCE

Zachary Rubin
{"title":"From Šulgi to Abraham: Encounters with Ur in the First Millennium BCE","authors":"Zachary Rubin","doi":"10.33182/aijls.v2i2.2837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Of all the ancient cities that could have served as Abraham’s hometown, why does the Hebrew Bible choose Ur? This article explores how different groups may have interacted with Ur and its legacy circa the exilic and postexilic periods of biblical authorship, to discern the ways different groups in Babylonia engaged with Ur, and how their interactions may have informed their perception of the city. It argues that Babylonian Judeans largely did not have direct access to the city or to the cuneiform artifacts that described its history. Instead, Judeans would have had to rely on information transmitted orally from Babylonians, whose interest in Ur may have been elevated due to the preponderance of artifacts from the Third Dynasty of Ur. As such, this article will evaluate different forms information traveled in the ancient world, and the ways they impacted the direction of cultural memory: through archaeological discoveries, word-of-mouth transmission, and scholarly rationalization.","PeriodicalId":222227,"journal":{"name":"Avar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Life and Society in the Ancient Near East","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Life and Society in the Ancient Near East","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33182/aijls.v2i2.2837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Of all the ancient cities that could have served as Abraham’s hometown, why does the Hebrew Bible choose Ur? This article explores how different groups may have interacted with Ur and its legacy circa the exilic and postexilic periods of biblical authorship, to discern the ways different groups in Babylonia engaged with Ur, and how their interactions may have informed their perception of the city. It argues that Babylonian Judeans largely did not have direct access to the city or to the cuneiform artifacts that described its history. Instead, Judeans would have had to rely on information transmitted orally from Babylonians, whose interest in Ur may have been elevated due to the preponderance of artifacts from the Third Dynasty of Ur. As such, this article will evaluate different forms information traveled in the ancient world, and the ways they impacted the direction of cultural memory: through archaeological discoveries, word-of-mouth transmission, and scholarly rationalization.
从舒尔吉到亚伯拉罕:公元前一千年与乌尔的相遇
在所有可能成为亚伯拉罕故乡的古城中,为什么《希伯来圣经》选择了吾珥?本文探讨了在圣经作者流放时期和流放后时期,不同群体可能是如何与吾珥及其遗产互动的,以了解巴比伦不同群体与吾珥互动的方式,以及他们的互动是如何影响他们对这座城市的看法的。该书认为,巴比伦的犹大人在很大程度上无法直接接触这座城市或描述其历史的楔形文字文物。相反,犹大人不得不依赖巴比伦人口口相传的信息,而巴比伦人对乌尔的兴趣可能会因为乌尔第三王朝出土的大量文物而提高。因此,本文将评估古代世界信息传播的不同形式,以及它们影响文化记忆方向的方式:通过考古发现、口口相传和学术合理化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信