Laboratory Tests and Numerical Simulations of Two Anti-Vibration Structures Made by 3D Printing – Comparative Research

IF 0.6 4区 物理与天体物理 Q4 ACOUSTICS
Piotr Kowalski, Adrian Alikowski
{"title":"Laboratory Tests and Numerical Simulations of Two Anti-Vibration Structures Made by 3D Printing – Comparative Research","authors":"Piotr Kowalski, Adrian Alikowski","doi":"10.24425/aoa.2023.146642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a comparison of test results from two models of anti-vibration systems (I and II) made employing MJF 3D printing technology and two different materials. The research included laboratory tests and numerical simulations, assuming a linear nature of the mechanical properties for the materials and models of structures. The aim of this research was to assess the consistency between laboratory test and numerical simulation results. In addition, evaluation of the suitability of using MJF technology to produce anti-vibration systems was conducted. During the laboratory tests, the response of the two models of structures to vibrations generated by an exciter was recorded using a high-speed camera. Subsequent image analysis was performed using the MOVIAS Neo software. The obtained values of vibration displacements and resonant frequencies were used to validate the numerical model created in the Simcenter Femap software. Relative differences between the values of resonant frequencies obtained experimentally and through simulations were determined. In the case of the structural model I, creating its numerical model without considering the non-linearity of mechanical parameters was found to be unjustified. The comparison of the displacements determined during numerical simulations showed relative differences of less than 16% for both models in relation to the laboratory test results. This comparison result indicates a satisfactory accuracy in simulating this parameter. An assessment of the quality and accuracy of MJF technology-produced prints, led to the conclusion that due to the formation of internal stresses during the print creation, the use of “soft” materials in this technology is problematic.","PeriodicalId":8149,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Acoustics","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Acoustics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/aoa.2023.146642","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a comparison of test results from two models of anti-vibration systems (I and II) made employing MJF 3D printing technology and two different materials. The research included laboratory tests and numerical simulations, assuming a linear nature of the mechanical properties for the materials and models of structures. The aim of this research was to assess the consistency between laboratory test and numerical simulation results. In addition, evaluation of the suitability of using MJF technology to produce anti-vibration systems was conducted. During the laboratory tests, the response of the two models of structures to vibrations generated by an exciter was recorded using a high-speed camera. Subsequent image analysis was performed using the MOVIAS Neo software. The obtained values of vibration displacements and resonant frequencies were used to validate the numerical model created in the Simcenter Femap software. Relative differences between the values of resonant frequencies obtained experimentally and through simulations were determined. In the case of the structural model I, creating its numerical model without considering the non-linearity of mechanical parameters was found to be unjustified. The comparison of the displacements determined during numerical simulations showed relative differences of less than 16% for both models in relation to the laboratory test results. This comparison result indicates a satisfactory accuracy in simulating this parameter. An assessment of the quality and accuracy of MJF technology-produced prints, led to the conclusion that due to the formation of internal stresses during the print creation, the use of “soft” materials in this technology is problematic.
两种 3D 打印防震结构的实验室测试和数值模拟 - 对比研究
本文比较了采用 MJF 三维打印技术和两种不同材料制作的两种防震系统模型(I 和 II)的测试结果。研究包括实验室测试和数值模拟,假设材料和结构模型的机械性能为线性。这项研究的目的是评估实验室测试和数值模拟结果之间的一致性。此外,还对使用 MJF 技术生产防震系统的适用性进行了评估。在实验室测试期间,使用高速摄像机记录了两种结构模型对激振器产生的振动的响应。随后使用 MOVIAS Neo 软件进行了图像分析。获得的振动位移和共振频率值用于验证 Simcenter Femap 软件创建的数值模型。确定了实验和模拟获得的共振频率值之间的相对差异。就结构模型 I 而言,在未考虑机械参数非线性的情况下创建数值模型是不合理的。对数值模拟过程中确定的位移进行比较后发现,两个模型与实验室测试结果的相对差异均小于 16%。这一比较结果表明该参数的模拟精度令人满意。通过对 MJF 技术生成的印刷品的质量和精确度进行评估,得出的结论是,由于在创建印刷品的过程中会形成内应力,因此在该技术中使用 "软 "材料是有问题的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Acoustics
Archives of Acoustics 物理-声学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Acoustics, the peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishes original research papers from all areas of acoustics like: acoustical measurements and instrumentation, acoustics of musics, acousto-optics, architectural, building and environmental acoustics, bioacoustics, electroacoustics, linear and nonlinear acoustics, noise and vibration, physical and chemical effects of sound, physiological acoustics, psychoacoustics, quantum acoustics, speech processing and communication systems, speech production and perception, transducers, ultrasonics, underwater acoustics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信