Five Rights of Antibiotic Safety: Antimicrobial Stewardship at One NHS Foundation Trust in England Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
R. Abdelsalam Elshenawy, N. Umaru, Z. Aslanpour
{"title":"Five Rights of Antibiotic Safety: Antimicrobial Stewardship at One NHS Foundation Trust in England Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"R. Abdelsalam Elshenawy, N. Umaru, Z. Aslanpour","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riad074.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study highlights the urgency of combating rising multi-drug-resistant infections, projecting 10 million deaths annually by 2050. With over 1.2 million deaths in 2019, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) has become a significant public health issue. Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) promotes judicious antibiotic use1. 'The Five Rights of Antibiotic Safety' ensure appropriate usage. It encompasses the right patient, drug, dose, time, and duration2. The COVID-19 pandemic, causing around 6 million deaths by 2023, has intensified AMR challenges. The Royal Pharmaceutical Society's AMS policy advocates for maximising the use of pharmacists' expertise to promote prudent antibiotic use, strengthen stewardship, and reduce AMR3. This study aimed to evaluate AMS and adherence to the 'Five Rights of Antibiotic Safety' in antibiotic prescribing at an NHS Foundation Trust during 2019 and 2020 amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. This research study was conducted using a cross-sectional retrospective design and undertook an in-depth analysis of 640 patient records in 2019 and 2020. The study included adult patients aged 25 and above, immunocompromised and pregnant individuals, and those prescribed antibiotics for respiratory tract infections or pneumonia during 2019 and 2020. A validated data extraction tool facilitated data collection. This study was registered under ISRCTN number 14825813, receiving ethical approval from the University of Hertfordshire Ethics and Health Research Authority (HRA) (REC Reference number 22/EM/0161). The Citizens Senate reviewed the study protocol, ensuring public and patient involvement. The study evaluated inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, identifying a rise in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing with no indication from 16% in 2019 to 20% in 2020. Inappropriate routes of administration also increased from 33% to 36%. While inappropriate drug choice remained steady around 63-64%, inappropriate dosing rose from 13% to 18%. Interestingly, inappropriate duration reduced slightly from 70% to 66%. The study assessed AMS champions, pharmacists' participation increased from 19% to 21%, and doctors decreased from 19% to 12%. However, combined collaboration jumped from 58% to 71%. This study highlights the surge in incorrect antibiotic prescribing during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, stressing the necessity of the 'Five Rights of Antibiotic Safety.' Strict guideline adherence and increased professional education are pivotal. Progress in reducing improper duration was seen, indicating the significance of refining prescribing practices. This research highlights the critical role of pharmacists and doctors as AMS champions. It demonstrates that their collaborative efforts during the pandemic positively impacted patient outcomes, thus reaffirming the Royal Pharmaceutical Society's AMS policy on the importance of a multidisciplinary team in ensuring appropriate antibiotic use. This study reveals a worrying increase in incorrect antibiotic use during 2020, calling for stricter compliance with the five safety rules and enhancing professional education. Reduced inappropriate duration of use suggests improvements in prescribing practices. The critical role of pharmacists and doctors in AMS, with heightened collaboration yielding prudent antibiotic use and better patient outcomes. Despite these insights, limitations like potential reporting bias, not exploring the causes of inappropriate prescribing in-depth, and a limited focus on doctors and pharmacists in AMS need future research. 1. Murray CJ. Global Burden of Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance in 2019: a Systematic Analysis. The Lancet. 2022 Jan 19;399(10325):629–55. 2. Federico F. The Five Rights of Medication Administration | IHI - Institute for Healthcare Improvement [Internet]. www.ihi.org. 2007. Available from: https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/ImprovementStories/FiveRightsofMedicationAdministration.aspx 3. The pharmacy contribution to antimicrobial stewardship [Internet]. Available from: https://www.rpharms.com/Portals/0/RPS%20document%20library/Open%20access/Policy/AMS%20policy.pdf.","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":"174 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riad074.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study highlights the urgency of combating rising multi-drug-resistant infections, projecting 10 million deaths annually by 2050. With over 1.2 million deaths in 2019, Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) has become a significant public health issue. Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) promotes judicious antibiotic use1. 'The Five Rights of Antibiotic Safety' ensure appropriate usage. It encompasses the right patient, drug, dose, time, and duration2. The COVID-19 pandemic, causing around 6 million deaths by 2023, has intensified AMR challenges. The Royal Pharmaceutical Society's AMS policy advocates for maximising the use of pharmacists' expertise to promote prudent antibiotic use, strengthen stewardship, and reduce AMR3. This study aimed to evaluate AMS and adherence to the 'Five Rights of Antibiotic Safety' in antibiotic prescribing at an NHS Foundation Trust during 2019 and 2020 amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. This research study was conducted using a cross-sectional retrospective design and undertook an in-depth analysis of 640 patient records in 2019 and 2020. The study included adult patients aged 25 and above, immunocompromised and pregnant individuals, and those prescribed antibiotics for respiratory tract infections or pneumonia during 2019 and 2020. A validated data extraction tool facilitated data collection. This study was registered under ISRCTN number 14825813, receiving ethical approval from the University of Hertfordshire Ethics and Health Research Authority (HRA) (REC Reference number 22/EM/0161). The Citizens Senate reviewed the study protocol, ensuring public and patient involvement. The study evaluated inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, identifying a rise in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing with no indication from 16% in 2019 to 20% in 2020. Inappropriate routes of administration also increased from 33% to 36%. While inappropriate drug choice remained steady around 63-64%, inappropriate dosing rose from 13% to 18%. Interestingly, inappropriate duration reduced slightly from 70% to 66%. The study assessed AMS champions, pharmacists' participation increased from 19% to 21%, and doctors decreased from 19% to 12%. However, combined collaboration jumped from 58% to 71%. This study highlights the surge in incorrect antibiotic prescribing during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, stressing the necessity of the 'Five Rights of Antibiotic Safety.' Strict guideline adherence and increased professional education are pivotal. Progress in reducing improper duration was seen, indicating the significance of refining prescribing practices. This research highlights the critical role of pharmacists and doctors as AMS champions. It demonstrates that their collaborative efforts during the pandemic positively impacted patient outcomes, thus reaffirming the Royal Pharmaceutical Society's AMS policy on the importance of a multidisciplinary team in ensuring appropriate antibiotic use. This study reveals a worrying increase in incorrect antibiotic use during 2020, calling for stricter compliance with the five safety rules and enhancing professional education. Reduced inappropriate duration of use suggests improvements in prescribing practices. The critical role of pharmacists and doctors in AMS, with heightened collaboration yielding prudent antibiotic use and better patient outcomes. Despite these insights, limitations like potential reporting bias, not exploring the causes of inappropriate prescribing in-depth, and a limited focus on doctors and pharmacists in AMS need future research. 1. Murray CJ. Global Burden of Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance in 2019: a Systematic Analysis. The Lancet. 2022 Jan 19;399(10325):629–55. 2. Federico F. The Five Rights of Medication Administration | IHI - Institute for Healthcare Improvement [Internet]. www.ihi.org. 2007. Available from: https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/ImprovementStories/FiveRightsofMedicationAdministration.aspx 3. The pharmacy contribution to antimicrobial stewardship [Internet]. Available from: https://www.rpharms.com/Portals/0/RPS%20document%20library/Open%20access/Policy/AMS%20policy.pdf.
抗生素安全的五项权利:英国一家国家医疗服务系统基金会信托机构在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间的抗菌药物管理工作
该研究强调了抗击日益增多的多重耐药感染的紧迫性,预计到 2050 年,每年将有 1000 万人死亡。随着 2019 年死亡人数超过 120 万,抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)已成为一个重大的公共卫生问题。抗菌药物管理(AMS)提倡合理使用抗生素1。抗生素安全五项权利 "确保了抗生素的合理使用。它包括正确的患者、药物、剂量、时间和持续时间2。到 2023 年,COVID-19 大流行将导致约 600 万人死亡,这加剧了 AMR 的挑战。英国皇家药学会的 AMS 政策提倡最大限度地利用药剂师的专业知识来促进抗生素的谨慎使用、加强监管并减少 AMR3。 本研究旨在评估 2019 年和 2020 年期间,在 COVID-19 大流行的情况下,一家 NHS 基金会信托基金会在抗生素处方中的 AMS 和对 "抗生素安全五项权利 "的遵守情况。 这项研究采用横断面回顾性设计,对2019年和2020年的640份病历进行了深入分析。研究对象包括 25 岁及以上的成年患者、免疫力低下者和孕妇,以及在 2019 年和 2020 年期间因呼吸道感染或肺炎而被处方抗生素的患者。经过验证的数据提取工具有助于数据收集。本研究注册号为 ISRCTN,编号为 14825813,获得了赫特福德大学伦理与健康研究管理局(HRA)的伦理批准(REC 编号 22/EM/0161)。公民评议会审查了研究方案,确保了公众和患者的参与。 该研究对不当抗生素处方进行了评估,发现无适应症的不当抗生素处方从 2019 年的 16% 增加到 2020 年的 20%。给药途径不当的比例也从 33% 上升到 36%。虽然药物选择不当的比例稳定在 63-64% 左右,但剂量不当的比例从 13% 上升到 18%。有趣的是,用药时间不当的比例略有下降,从 70% 降至 66%。该研究对 AMS 冠军进行了评估,药剂师的参与率从 19% 上升到 21%,医生的参与率从 19% 下降到 12%。然而,综合合作率从 58% 跃升至 71%。 这项研究强调,在 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行期间,错误的抗生素处方会激增,从而强调了 "抗生素安全五项权利 "的必要性。严格遵守指南和加强专业教育至关重要。在减少不当用药时间方面取得了进展,这表明了改进处方实践的重要性。这项研究强调了药剂师和医生作为 AMS 倡导者的关键作用。研究表明,他们在大流行期间的共同努力对患者的治疗效果产生了积极影响,从而再次证实了英国皇家药学会关于多学科团队在确保合理使用抗生素方面的重要性的 AMS 政策。 这项研究显示,2020 年期间抗生素使用不当的情况有所增加,令人担忧,因此需要更严格地遵守五项安全规则并加强专业教育。不恰当使用时间的减少表明处方实践有所改进。药剂师和医生在急性髓系白血病中发挥着关键作用,加强合作可谨慎使用抗生素并改善患者预后。尽管有这些见解,但仍有一些局限性,如可能存在报告偏差、没有深入探讨不当处方的原因、对急性呼吸系统综合征中医生和药剂师的关注有限等,这些都需要未来的研究来解决。 1.Murray CJ.2019 年全球细菌抗菌药耐药性的负担:系统分析》(Global Burden of Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance in 2019: a Systematic Analysis)。The Lancet.2022 Jan 19;399(10325):629-55. 2.Federico F. The Five Rights of Medication Administration | IHI - Institute for Healthcare Improvement [Internet]. www.ihi.org.2007.Available from: https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/ImprovementStories/FiveRightsofMedicationAdministration.aspx 3.药房对抗菌药物管理的贡献 [Internet].Available from: https://www.rpharms.com/Portals/0/RPS%20document%20library/Open%20access/Policy/AMS%20policy.pdf.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信