Literature Review Hydration Assessment Methods in the Elderly Population: Advantages and Disadvantages

Sheila Amara Putri, Farapti Farapti
{"title":"Literature Review Hydration Assessment Methods in the Elderly Population: Advantages and Disadvantages","authors":"Sheila Amara Putri, Farapti Farapti","doi":"10.20473/mgk.v12i2.2023.1145-1152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The elderly population is vulnerable to hydration problems, which can have adverse effects on their health. Accurate and reliable hydration assessment methods are crucial for effective detection, monitoring, and management of hydration status in the elderly. However, there is currently no consensus on the optimal method. Objectives: This literature aims to analyze the hydration assessment methods used in the elderly population and evaluate their strengths and limitations. Methods: This study gathered data from relevant literature and research articles obtained from journals in databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct. Articles were searched using keywords such as Hydration Assessment, Hydration Markers, and (elderly OR older). Data sources included publications from official websites and research journals. The literature review process involved selecting the review topic, searching for relevant articles, and analyzing and synthesizing the available literature. Discussion: Several hydration assessment methods in the elderly include biochemical parameters, clinical signs and symptoms, bioimpedance analysis (BIA), and ultrasonography. However, no single method can provide a comprehensive picture of dehydration status in the elderly. Conclusions: When selecting an appropriate assessment method, factors such as assessment goals, strengths, limitations, sensitivity, specificity, cost, equipment availability, ease of use, and time required need to be considered. By considering these factors, researchers can choose the most suitable hydration assessment method for the elderly population, thereby obtaining accurate and relevant information for proper management and care.","PeriodicalId":306707,"journal":{"name":"Media Gizi Kesmas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media Gizi Kesmas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/mgk.v12i2.2023.1145-1152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The elderly population is vulnerable to hydration problems, which can have adverse effects on their health. Accurate and reliable hydration assessment methods are crucial for effective detection, monitoring, and management of hydration status in the elderly. However, there is currently no consensus on the optimal method. Objectives: This literature aims to analyze the hydration assessment methods used in the elderly population and evaluate their strengths and limitations. Methods: This study gathered data from relevant literature and research articles obtained from journals in databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct. Articles were searched using keywords such as Hydration Assessment, Hydration Markers, and (elderly OR older). Data sources included publications from official websites and research journals. The literature review process involved selecting the review topic, searching for relevant articles, and analyzing and synthesizing the available literature. Discussion: Several hydration assessment methods in the elderly include biochemical parameters, clinical signs and symptoms, bioimpedance analysis (BIA), and ultrasonography. However, no single method can provide a comprehensive picture of dehydration status in the elderly. Conclusions: When selecting an appropriate assessment method, factors such as assessment goals, strengths, limitations, sensitivity, specificity, cost, equipment availability, ease of use, and time required need to be considered. By considering these factors, researchers can choose the most suitable hydration assessment method for the elderly population, thereby obtaining accurate and relevant information for proper management and care.
文献综述 老年人水合评估方法:优缺点
背景:老年人容易出现水合问题,这可能会对他们的健康产生不利影响。准确可靠的水合评估方法对于有效检测、监控和管理老年人的水合状态至关重要。然而,目前还没有就最佳方法达成共识。 本文献旨在分析水合状态的评估方法:本文献旨在分析老年人群中使用的水合评估方法,并评估其优点和局限性。 方法:本研究从 PubMed、Google Scholar 和 Science Direct 等数据库中的期刊上获取的相关文献和研究文章中收集数据。文章使用水合评估、水合标记和(老年人或老年)等关键词进行搜索。数据来源包括官方网站和研究期刊上的出版物。文献综述过程包括选择综述主题、搜索相关文章以及分析和综合现有文献。 讨论:老年人水合评估的几种方法包括生化参数、临床体征和症状、生物阻抗分析 (BIA) 和超声波检查。但是,没有一种方法能全面反映老年人的脱水状况。 结论:在选择合适的评估方法时,需要考虑评估目标、优势、局限性、灵敏度、特异性、成本、设备可用性、易用性和所需时间等因素。通过考虑这些因素,研究人员可以为老年人群选择最合适的水合评估方法,从而获得准确的相关信息,以便进行适当的管理和护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信