Informativity of the method of correlation adaptometry for assessing the severity of the corrective effect of combined use therapeutic physical factors on the example of metabolic syndrome

A. A. Benkov, S. Nagornev, V. K. Frolkov, Dmitry A. Edelev, O. V. Korlyakova
{"title":"Informativity of the method of correlation adaptometry for assessing the severity of the corrective effect of combined use therapeutic physical factors on the example of metabolic syndrome","authors":"A. A. Benkov, S. Nagornev, V. K. Frolkov, Dmitry A. Edelev, O. V. Korlyakova","doi":"10.17816/rjpbr401115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of therapeutic physical factors using the method of correlation adaptometry is based on the effect of increasing the number of severity of correlation dependencies between the parameters characterizing the functional state of the body under the action of a stressor. AIM: Evaluation of the effectiveness of the combined use of transcranial magnetotherapy and a pulsed low-frequency electrostatic field in patients with metabolic syndrome using the method of correlation adaptometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 100 patients with a diagnosis of metabolic syndrome established in accordance with clinical guidelines. All patients were divided into four groups of 25 by simple fixed randomization. Patients in the control group received a placebo effect (imitation of physiotherapeutic effects with the device turned off) for 10 days of observation, in comparison group 1 ― exposure to a low-frequency electrostatic field, in comparison group 2 ― transcranial magnetotherapy with a traveling magnetic field, in the main group ― exposure to a pulsed electrostatic field in combination with transcranial magnetotherapy. The objectification of the effects of physiotherapy (evaluation of functional, biochemical and hormonal parameters) was based on a two-stage examination (before and after a course of treatment). RESULTS: Correlation adaptometry was based on the results of correlation analysis using a correlation matrix of variables characterizing the condition of patients after course correction. For each of the four groups of patients, 28 correlation coefficients were determined. For each group, 378 correlation coefficients were calculated, presented as the weight of the correlation graph. Additionally, the indicator of the average adaptive correlation was calculated. It is shown that the use of therapeutic physical factors is accompanied by a decrease in the weight of the correlation graph, which indicates the severity of the clinical effect due to the sanogenetic action of physiofactors. The most pronounced decrease was noted in the group of combined physiotherapy. Correlation analysis between the parameters of the average adaptive correlation and the integral coefficient of therapy efficiency showed that there is a strong, negative significant relationship between the HOMA insulin resistance index and the Quetelet index, chosen as the most informative variables. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the method of correlation adaptometry is highly informative in assessing the effectiveness of using a pulsed low-frequency electrostatic field, transcranial magnetotherapy and their combined effects in patients with metabolic syndrome. A decrease in the indicator of the average adaptive correlation indicates an increase in the functional reserves of the system, the patterns of which are changes in certain estimated parameters that are not related to each other.","PeriodicalId":226051,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation","volume":"656 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/rjpbr401115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of therapeutic physical factors using the method of correlation adaptometry is based on the effect of increasing the number of severity of correlation dependencies between the parameters characterizing the functional state of the body under the action of a stressor. AIM: Evaluation of the effectiveness of the combined use of transcranial magnetotherapy and a pulsed low-frequency electrostatic field in patients with metabolic syndrome using the method of correlation adaptometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 100 patients with a diagnosis of metabolic syndrome established in accordance with clinical guidelines. All patients were divided into four groups of 25 by simple fixed randomization. Patients in the control group received a placebo effect (imitation of physiotherapeutic effects with the device turned off) for 10 days of observation, in comparison group 1 ― exposure to a low-frequency electrostatic field, in comparison group 2 ― transcranial magnetotherapy with a traveling magnetic field, in the main group ― exposure to a pulsed electrostatic field in combination with transcranial magnetotherapy. The objectification of the effects of physiotherapy (evaluation of functional, biochemical and hormonal parameters) was based on a two-stage examination (before and after a course of treatment). RESULTS: Correlation adaptometry was based on the results of correlation analysis using a correlation matrix of variables characterizing the condition of patients after course correction. For each of the four groups of patients, 28 correlation coefficients were determined. For each group, 378 correlation coefficients were calculated, presented as the weight of the correlation graph. Additionally, the indicator of the average adaptive correlation was calculated. It is shown that the use of therapeutic physical factors is accompanied by a decrease in the weight of the correlation graph, which indicates the severity of the clinical effect due to the sanogenetic action of physiofactors. The most pronounced decrease was noted in the group of combined physiotherapy. Correlation analysis between the parameters of the average adaptive correlation and the integral coefficient of therapy efficiency showed that there is a strong, negative significant relationship between the HOMA insulin resistance index and the Quetelet index, chosen as the most informative variables. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the method of correlation adaptometry is highly informative in assessing the effectiveness of using a pulsed low-frequency electrostatic field, transcranial magnetotherapy and their combined effects in patients with metabolic syndrome. A decrease in the indicator of the average adaptive correlation indicates an increase in the functional reserves of the system, the patterns of which are changes in certain estimated parameters that are not related to each other.
以代谢综合征为例,评估联合使用治疗性物理因素的矫正效果严重程度的相关适应测量法的信息量
背景:使用相关适应度测量法评估使用治疗性物理因素的有效性,是基于在压力作用下增加表征机体功能状态的参数之间相关依赖性严重程度的效果。 目的:使用相关适应度测量法评估经颅磁疗和脉冲低频静电场联合使用对代谢综合征患者的疗效。 材料和方法:研究涉及 100 名根据临床指南确诊为代谢综合征的患者。通过简单固定的随机方法将所有患者分为四组,每组 25 人。对照组患者接受为期 10 天的安慰剂治疗(在设备关闭的情况下模仿物理治疗效果),对比组 1 患者接受低频静电场治疗,对比组 2 患者接受带行进磁场的经颅磁疗,主要组患者接受脉冲静电场治疗和经颅磁疗。物理治疗效果(功能、生化和荷尔蒙参数评估)的客观化基于两个阶段的检查(治疗前和治疗后)。 结果:相关适配测量是基于相关分析的结果,使用的是描述疗程矫正后患者状况的变量相关矩阵。在四组患者中,每组确定了 28 个相关系数。每组共计算出 378 个相关系数,以相关图的权重表示。此外,还计算了平均适应相关性指标。结果表明,在使用治疗性物理因子的同时,相关图的权重也会降低,这表明物理因子的生化作用所产生的临床效果的严重程度。联合物理疗法组的下降最为明显。平均自适应相关性参数与治疗效率积分系数之间的相关性分析表明,HOMA 胰岛素抵抗指数与 Quetelet 指数(被选为信息量最大的变量)之间存在强烈的负向显著关系。 结论:可以得出结论,在评估代谢综合征患者使用脉冲低频静电场、经颅磁疗及其联合疗法的效果时,相关适应度测量法具有很高的参考价值。平均自适应相关性指标的下降表明系统功能储备的增加,其模式是某些估计参数的变化,而这些参数是互不相关的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信