The benchmarking analysis of ESG transformation models of socio-economic systems in various countries

Sergei Mityakov, Tatyana Bolonicheva, Kirill Kolesov, Olga Mityakova, Natalya Murashova
{"title":"The benchmarking analysis of ESG transformation models of socio-economic systems in various countries","authors":"Sergei Mityakov, Tatyana Bolonicheva, Kirill Kolesov, Olga Mityakova, Natalya Murashova","doi":"10.5377/nexo.v36i05.17303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this work is to conduct the benchmarking analysis of ESG-transformation models of socio-economic systems in various countries, such as the Russian Federation, the United States of America, Germany and China. The work used the combination of systemic, dialectical and historical approaches that allow comparing three aspects of the sustainable development of socio-economic systems: environmental, social and economic. The dynamic analysis of the sustainable development of the countries for the period 2010-2022 was carried out according to various indicators that make up the system of ESG projections and correspond to the goals of the sustainable development. The comparative analysis of the sustainable development of the countries for 2022 was carried out according to various projections of the sustainable development. To achieve the goal the article has formed the system of measurable indicators that are used in the official statistics and reflect the economic, social and environmental aspects of the sustainable development of society. The proposed system of the indicators satisfies the principles of the comparability, necessity, sufficiency and reliability allows you to evaluate the effectiveness of ESG transformation for different countries and carry out cross-country comparisons.","PeriodicalId":335817,"journal":{"name":"Nexo Revista Científica","volume":"236 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nexo Revista Científica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5377/nexo.v36i05.17303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to conduct the benchmarking analysis of ESG-transformation models of socio-economic systems in various countries, such as the Russian Federation, the United States of America, Germany and China. The work used the combination of systemic, dialectical and historical approaches that allow comparing three aspects of the sustainable development of socio-economic systems: environmental, social and economic. The dynamic analysis of the sustainable development of the countries for the period 2010-2022 was carried out according to various indicators that make up the system of ESG projections and correspond to the goals of the sustainable development. The comparative analysis of the sustainable development of the countries for 2022 was carried out according to various projections of the sustainable development. To achieve the goal the article has formed the system of measurable indicators that are used in the official statistics and reflect the economic, social and environmental aspects of the sustainable development of society. The proposed system of the indicators satisfies the principles of the comparability, necessity, sufficiency and reliability allows you to evaluate the effectiveness of ESG transformation for different countries and carry out cross-country comparisons.
各国社会经济系统 ESG 转型模式的基准分析
这项工作的目的是对俄罗斯联邦、美国、德国和中国等不同国家社会经济体系的环境、社会和经济转型模式进行基准分析。这项工作采用了系统、辩证和历史相结合的方法,可以对社会经济系统可持续发展的三个方面进行比较:环境、社会和经济。根据构成环境、社会和治理预测系统并与可持续发展目标相对应的各种指标,对 2010-2022 年期间各国的可持续发展进行了动态分析。根据可持续发展的各种预测,对 2022 年各国的可持续发展进行了比较分析。为了实现这一目标,文章形成了可衡量的指标体系,这些指标用于官方统计,反映了社会可持续发展的经济、社会和环境方面。建议的指标体系符合可比性、必要性、充分性和可靠性原则,可以评估不同国家的环境、社会和治理转型的有效性,并进行跨国比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信