A Study on the Profit of Claims on Teacher Appeal

Saeon Cheong
{"title":"A Study on the Profit of Claims on Teacher Appeal","authors":"Saeon Cheong","doi":"10.46751/nplak.2023.19.4.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under the Teacher Status Act, the teacher appeal review system is a special legal system that can function very importantly as a pre-trial remedy for teachers' educational activities and illegal infringement of rights and interests. In order for the Faculty Appeal Review Committee to fulfill its legal and institutional functions, it is natural that teachers must have high reliability and utilization of the system. However, if teachers are not aware of the necessity of such a system, and they become distrustful, there will be no purpose for the system to exist. Therefore, in order to enhance the necessity and function of the teacher appeal review system, the general reason for existence of the system, the benefits of claims in administrative trials, administrative litigation, and constitutional complaints were reviewed, and the hearing, scope, and deliberation laws of the teacher appeal review committee were briefly reviewed. In particular, the expansion of the subjectivity of the teacher appeal is very consistent with the purpose of the existence of the teacher appeal system, the protection of teachers' educational activities, and the protection of teaching rights. Next, the Teachers' Appeal Review Committee plans to expand the scope of the claimed profits. Given that the disposition, which is the subject of administrative disputes, is expanding to general dispositions and that the subject is gradually expanding, it is necessary to expand the eligibility of claimants and claim profits to aspects of economic interests, not just power alone and power factual actions. The third is the expansion of the legal principles for hearing. In other words, it is a plan to expand the legal principles for reviewing discretionary power at the Faculty Appeal Review Committee. If the scope of the recognition of discretion is expanded beyond the logic of simple discretionary rights and the law on the deviation and abuse of discretionary power can be applied, the purpose of the existence of the teacher appeal review system can be greatly improved. In other words, I think that it will be a very useful and convenient relief system for teachers even if the target of teacher appeal is expanded.","PeriodicalId":423802,"journal":{"name":"National Public Law Review","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Public Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46751/nplak.2023.19.4.167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Under the Teacher Status Act, the teacher appeal review system is a special legal system that can function very importantly as a pre-trial remedy for teachers' educational activities and illegal infringement of rights and interests. In order for the Faculty Appeal Review Committee to fulfill its legal and institutional functions, it is natural that teachers must have high reliability and utilization of the system. However, if teachers are not aware of the necessity of such a system, and they become distrustful, there will be no purpose for the system to exist. Therefore, in order to enhance the necessity and function of the teacher appeal review system, the general reason for existence of the system, the benefits of claims in administrative trials, administrative litigation, and constitutional complaints were reviewed, and the hearing, scope, and deliberation laws of the teacher appeal review committee were briefly reviewed. In particular, the expansion of the subjectivity of the teacher appeal is very consistent with the purpose of the existence of the teacher appeal system, the protection of teachers' educational activities, and the protection of teaching rights. Next, the Teachers' Appeal Review Committee plans to expand the scope of the claimed profits. Given that the disposition, which is the subject of administrative disputes, is expanding to general dispositions and that the subject is gradually expanding, it is necessary to expand the eligibility of claimants and claim profits to aspects of economic interests, not just power alone and power factual actions. The third is the expansion of the legal principles for hearing. In other words, it is a plan to expand the legal principles for reviewing discretionary power at the Faculty Appeal Review Committee. If the scope of the recognition of discretion is expanded beyond the logic of simple discretionary rights and the law on the deviation and abuse of discretionary power can be applied, the purpose of the existence of the teacher appeal review system can be greatly improved. In other words, I think that it will be a very useful and convenient relief system for teachers even if the target of teacher appeal is expanded.
关于教师上诉索赔收益的研究
根据《教师地位法》的规定,教师申诉复议制度是一项特殊的法律制度,对教师的教育教学活动和权益受到的非法侵害具有非常重要的诉前救济功能。教师申诉复议委员会要发挥其法律和制度功能,自然需要教师对该制度有较高的信赖度和利用率。但是,如果教师没有意识到这一制度的必要性,对其产生不信任感,那么这一制度的存在也就失去了意义。因此,为了强化教师申诉审查制度的必要性和功能,对该制度存在的一般理由,行政审判、行政诉讼、宪法申诉中的诉求利益等进行了梳理,并对教师申诉审查委员会的审理、范围、审议规律等进行了简要评述。其中,教师申诉主体性的扩大与教师申诉制度存在的目的、对教师教育活动的保护以及对教师权利的保护是非常一致的。其次,教师申诉审查委员会计划扩大主张利益的范围。鉴于作为行政争议主体的处分权正在向一般处分权扩展,主体逐渐扩大,有必要将请求人资格和请求利益扩展到经济利益的各个方面,而不仅仅是单纯的权力和权力事实行为。三是听证法律原则的拓展。换句话说,就是计划扩大院系申诉审查委员会审查自由裁量权的法律原则。如果将自由裁量权的认定范围扩大到单纯的自由裁量权的逻辑之外,运用自由裁量权的偏离与滥用的法律,就可以大大提高教师申诉审查制度存在的意义。換句話說,我認為即使擴大教師上訴的對象,對於教師來說,也會是一 種非常有用和方便的濟助制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信