The Effects of Title I Programs on Students Proficiency in the U.S. and Implications for Korea

Taek Hyung Kim
{"title":"The Effects of Title I Programs on Students Proficiency in the U.S. and Implications for Korea","authors":"Taek Hyung Kim","doi":"10.20306/kces.2023.33.5.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[Purpose] This paper aims to empirically investigate the impact of the federally funded Title I program on the performance of students from low-income families, as assessed through the state's own assessments. Additionally, the study seeks to discern the relative effectiveness of two specific program, namely the school-wide program and the targeted assistant program, to see which program is more effective. [Methods] To accomplish these objectives, the research leverages two national data sets from 2008-09 to 2013-14, sourced from the U.S. Department of Education's EDFacts and the National Center for Education Statistics' Common Core of Data. Employing fixed-effects and mixed-effects models with the school-level data, the study conducts a rigorous examination of the program's impact across various grade levels. [Results] The findings of this study reveal that the Title I program exerts substantially positive effects on academic outcomes of economically disadvantaged students in lower grades, with moderate positive effects observed in middle grades. However, no discernible impact is observed at the high school level. In terms of the specific program effects, lower grade levels exhibited higher achievement when implementing the “school-wide program”, whereas high schools showed lower achievement. Conversely, transitioning from the “targeted assistant program” to the “school-wide program” demonstrated positive effects only at the high school level. [Conclusion] The results of this study demonstrate the importance of prioritizing investments in early grades when providing educational services or support to students in need. As students progress to higher grades, there is a need to design and implement programs that are tailored to their levels and circumstances. Furthermore, in allocating education finances for low-income groups, prioritize elementary schools for 'whole-school programs,' and support high schools in developing the capacity to run comprehensive programs.","PeriodicalId":135100,"journal":{"name":"Korean Comparative Education Society","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Comparative Education Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20306/kces.2023.33.5.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

[Purpose] This paper aims to empirically investigate the impact of the federally funded Title I program on the performance of students from low-income families, as assessed through the state's own assessments. Additionally, the study seeks to discern the relative effectiveness of two specific program, namely the school-wide program and the targeted assistant program, to see which program is more effective. [Methods] To accomplish these objectives, the research leverages two national data sets from 2008-09 to 2013-14, sourced from the U.S. Department of Education's EDFacts and the National Center for Education Statistics' Common Core of Data. Employing fixed-effects and mixed-effects models with the school-level data, the study conducts a rigorous examination of the program's impact across various grade levels. [Results] The findings of this study reveal that the Title I program exerts substantially positive effects on academic outcomes of economically disadvantaged students in lower grades, with moderate positive effects observed in middle grades. However, no discernible impact is observed at the high school level. In terms of the specific program effects, lower grade levels exhibited higher achievement when implementing the “school-wide program”, whereas high schools showed lower achievement. Conversely, transitioning from the “targeted assistant program” to the “school-wide program” demonstrated positive effects only at the high school level. [Conclusion] The results of this study demonstrate the importance of prioritizing investments in early grades when providing educational services or support to students in need. As students progress to higher grades, there is a need to design and implement programs that are tailored to their levels and circumstances. Furthermore, in allocating education finances for low-income groups, prioritize elementary schools for 'whole-school programs,' and support high schools in developing the capacity to run comprehensive programs.
Title I 计划对美国学生能力的影响及对韩国的启示
[目的] 本文旨在通过实证研究联邦资助的 Title I 计划对低收入家庭学生成绩的影响,该计划通过州自己的评估进行评估。此外,本研究还试图找出两个具体计划(即全校计划和有针对性的助理计划)的相对有效性,以确定哪个计划更有效。 [方法]为了实现这些目标,本研究利用了 2008-09 学年至 2013-14 学年的两个国家数据集,这两个数据集分别来自美国教育部的 EDFacts 和国家教育统计中心的共同核心数据。研究利用学校层面的数据,采用固定效应和混合效应模型,对该计划在不同年级的影响进行了严格的检验。 [结果]研究结果表明,"第一标题 "计划对低年级经济困难学生的学业成绩产生了实质性的积极影响,并对中年级产生了中等程度的积极影响。但是,在高中阶段没有观察到明显的影响。从具体的计划效果来看,在实施 "全校计划 "时,低年级的成绩较高,而高中的成绩较低。相反,从 "目标助理计划 "过渡到 "全校计划 "只在高中阶段产生了积极影响。 [结论] 这项研究的结果表明,在为有需要的学生提供教育服务或支持时,优先投资低年级是非常重要的。随着学生升入高年级,有必要设计和实施适合其水平和情况的计划。此外,在为低收入群体分配教育经费时,应优先考虑在小学实施 "全校计划",并支持高中培养实施综合计划的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信