Reconceptualizing Conventional Subdivided-Units and New Empirical Evidences

Mee-Youn Jin, Kyeong-Mi Kim
{"title":"Reconceptualizing Conventional Subdivided-Units and New Empirical Evidences","authors":"Mee-Youn Jin, Kyeong-Mi Kim","doi":"10.24957/hsr.2023.31.4.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to redefine the concept of ‘conventional subdivided-units’ and identify households living in the revised subdivided-units using empirical data. The term ‘subdivided-units’ with low-end small rental often has been used in policy language in official documents so far but it has yet to be formulated. In this paper, considering objectification and measurability, the “subdivision-shaped units” that modified the ‘conventional subdivided-units’ was defined as “dwelling where the area of indoor space used by a household for residential uses is less than 7㎡ or those units that are not self-contained. Empirical results show that about 210,000 households reside in the subdivision-shaped units as modified subdivided-units and 46.6% of them live in types similar to conventional subdivided-units (on a monthly rent basis with no-deposit and costing less than 300,000 won per month). The most similar to the overall characteristics of conventional subdivided-units were Gosiwon accommodations or lodgings. In light of recent global discourses, the subdivision-shaped units can be regarded as informal housing in Korean context. Although it is a cheap alternative for the vulnerable who have been priced out of formal housing, it continuously poses a health and safety threat to tenants. For more improvements, it is necessary to establish a reliable data infrastructure that can catch up with the real figures in terms of hiddenness >, diversity, and complicated hybridity. Based on such data, adequate housing standards should be made into rules in the national policy-level.","PeriodicalId":255849,"journal":{"name":"Korean Association for Housing Policy Studies","volume":"58 7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Association for Housing Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24957/hsr.2023.31.4.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to redefine the concept of ‘conventional subdivided-units’ and identify households living in the revised subdivided-units using empirical data. The term ‘subdivided-units’ with low-end small rental often has been used in policy language in official documents so far but it has yet to be formulated. In this paper, considering objectification and measurability, the “subdivision-shaped units” that modified the ‘conventional subdivided-units’ was defined as “dwelling where the area of indoor space used by a household for residential uses is less than 7㎡ or those units that are not self-contained. Empirical results show that about 210,000 households reside in the subdivision-shaped units as modified subdivided-units and 46.6% of them live in types similar to conventional subdivided-units (on a monthly rent basis with no-deposit and costing less than 300,000 won per month). The most similar to the overall characteristics of conventional subdivided-units were Gosiwon accommodations or lodgings. In light of recent global discourses, the subdivision-shaped units can be regarded as informal housing in Korean context. Although it is a cheap alternative for the vulnerable who have been priced out of formal housing, it continuously poses a health and safety threat to tenants. For more improvements, it is necessary to establish a reliable data infrastructure that can catch up with the real figures in terms of hiddenness >, diversity, and complicated hybridity. Based on such data, adequate housing standards should be made into rules in the national policy-level.
重新认识传统的细分单元和新的经验证据
本文旨在重新定义 "传统劏房 "的概念,并利用实证数据识别居住在经修订的劏房内的住户。低端小户型 "劏房 "一词在官方文件的政策用语中经常出现,但至今仍未形成规范。本文考虑到客观性和可测性,将 "传统'劏房'"改头换面的 "劏房 "定义为 "住户用于居住的室内空间面积小于 7 平方米或非独立单元的住宅"。 实证结果显示,约有 21 万户家庭居住在改良劏房的分户型单元中,其中 46.6% 的家庭居住在与传统劏房类似的类型中(月租、无押金、月租低于 30 万韩元)。与传统劏房整体特征最相似的是高士院住宿或民宿。根据最近的全球讨论,在韩国,"劏房 "可被视为非正规住房。虽然对于被正规住房挤出的弱势群体来说,这是一种廉价的替代方式,但它仍然对租户的健康和安全构成威胁。为了进一步改进,有必要建立可靠的数据基础设施,以便在隐蔽性>、多样性和复杂的混合性方面赶上真实数字。在这些数据的基础上,适当的住房标准应成为国家政策层面的规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信