Level of effort and economic dishonesty: Are expectations relevant?

Tomas Bonavia, Josué Brox-Ponce, María F. Rodrigo
{"title":"Level of effort and economic dishonesty: Are expectations relevant?","authors":"Tomas Bonavia, Josué Brox-Ponce, María F. Rodrigo","doi":"10.5964/ejop.10429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some research has shown that expectations modulate people’s economic dishonesty. These studies have allowed their participants to precisely establish the dishonest extra financial gain, without threatening their image of honesty. In this article, we show that in situations where our economic dishonesty is driven by hard-to-quantify motivators such as level of effort, it is difficult to change the categorization of (dishonest) judgments. Faced with this ambiguity, people make decisions guided by moral intuitions that are not conditioned by changing expectations. We carried out three studies (one single-group study and two experimental between-subjects studies) in which we tested whether the level of deception varies when manipulating expectations of transparency/privacy and dishonesty/honesty. Our results show that the levels of dishonesty remain low, regardless of the participants’ expectations. When our decisions are motivated by more ambiguous factors, in terms of being able to justify ourselves, our economic dishonesty becomes more rigidly directed toward the dictates of our moral intuitions.","PeriodicalId":117577,"journal":{"name":"Europe’s Journal of Psychology","volume":"57 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europe’s Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.10429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some research has shown that expectations modulate people’s economic dishonesty. These studies have allowed their participants to precisely establish the dishonest extra financial gain, without threatening their image of honesty. In this article, we show that in situations where our economic dishonesty is driven by hard-to-quantify motivators such as level of effort, it is difficult to change the categorization of (dishonest) judgments. Faced with this ambiguity, people make decisions guided by moral intuitions that are not conditioned by changing expectations. We carried out three studies (one single-group study and two experimental between-subjects studies) in which we tested whether the level of deception varies when manipulating expectations of transparency/privacy and dishonesty/honesty. Our results show that the levels of dishonesty remain low, regardless of the participants’ expectations. When our decisions are motivated by more ambiguous factors, in terms of being able to justify ourselves, our economic dishonesty becomes more rigidly directed toward the dictates of our moral intuitions.
努力程度与经济不诚信:期望是否相关?
一些研究表明,预期会调节人们的经济不诚实行为。这些研究允许参与者精确地确定不诚实的额外经济收益,而不会威胁到他们的诚实形象。在本文中,我们表明,在经济不诚实是由难以量化的动机(如努力程度)驱动的情况下,很难改变(不诚实)判断的分类。面对这种模棱两可的情况,人们会在道德直觉的指导下做出决定,而道德直觉并不受预期变化的影响。我们进行了三项研究(一项单组研究和两项受试者间实验研究),测试了在操纵对透明/隐私和不诚实/诚实的期望时,欺骗程度是否会发生变化。我们的结果表明,无论参与者的期望如何,不诚实的程度都很低。当我们的决策受到更多模棱两可的因素的影响时,在能够为自己辩解的情况下,我们的经济不诚实行为会更加严格地遵循我们的道德直觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信