Moral Cartography: Classifications of Village Residents in the Everyday Life of Rural Bureaucrats

Q3 Social Sciences
Aleksandra Zakharova
{"title":"Moral Cartography: Classifications of Village Residents in the Everyday Life of Rural Bureaucrats","authors":"Aleksandra Zakharova","doi":"10.31250/1815-8870-2023-19-59-103-129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the classifications of the residents of settlements used by rural bureaucrats (employees of rural administrations and members of their teams). The analysis is based on materials gathered through participant observation in two rural settlements in southwestern Siberia. The principles by which the “characters” of villages are distinguished are examined, i.e. in what contexts a “moral cartography” of localities takes place. The study shows that the most frequent differentiating features in the bureaucratic characterization of villages are: 1) the independence of residents in solving their problems or addressing the requirements of the administration; 2) cohesion and willingness to help bureaucrats in governance or lack thereof. These classification signs indicate the “problematic nature” of the village for rural bureaucrats, i.e. the possibility of conflicts, complaints and claims. The author concludes that one of the functions of the bureaucratic classification of villages is contingency coping strategy, which is characteristic of the task-oriented work of rural bureaucrats. Knowledge of the “character” of the inhabitants of settlements allows officials to form expectations, develop work strategies and explain managerial successes and failures. In addition, the ability to map the social space of a village is important for confirming the status of rural governors and especially the heads of rural administrations. Faced daily with a shortage of administrative and material resources, rural bureaucrats find their own intermediate positions to be vulnerable. However, the “proper” knowledge of social space allows them seemingly to reverse their dependent position. As for governors responsible for space, the classifications of villages give local officials an opportunity to demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge of the territory, thereby testifying to their status as “owners” (khozyaeva) of the land.","PeriodicalId":52194,"journal":{"name":"Antropologicheskij Forum","volume":"23 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antropologicheskij Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31250/1815-8870-2023-19-59-103-129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the classifications of the residents of settlements used by rural bureaucrats (employees of rural administrations and members of their teams). The analysis is based on materials gathered through participant observation in two rural settlements in southwestern Siberia. The principles by which the “characters” of villages are distinguished are examined, i.e. in what contexts a “moral cartography” of localities takes place. The study shows that the most frequent differentiating features in the bureaucratic characterization of villages are: 1) the independence of residents in solving their problems or addressing the requirements of the administration; 2) cohesion and willingness to help bureaucrats in governance or lack thereof. These classification signs indicate the “problematic nature” of the village for rural bureaucrats, i.e. the possibility of conflicts, complaints and claims. The author concludes that one of the functions of the bureaucratic classification of villages is contingency coping strategy, which is characteristic of the task-oriented work of rural bureaucrats. Knowledge of the “character” of the inhabitants of settlements allows officials to form expectations, develop work strategies and explain managerial successes and failures. In addition, the ability to map the social space of a village is important for confirming the status of rural governors and especially the heads of rural administrations. Faced daily with a shortage of administrative and material resources, rural bureaucrats find their own intermediate positions to be vulnerable. However, the “proper” knowledge of social space allows them seemingly to reverse their dependent position. As for governors responsible for space, the classifications of villages give local officials an opportunity to demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge of the territory, thereby testifying to their status as “owners” (khozyaeva) of the land.
道德地图:农村官僚日常生活中的村民分类
文章分析了农村官僚(农村行政机构雇员及其团队成员)对居民点居民的分类。分析以在西伯利亚西南部两个农村居民点的参与观察收集的材料为基础。研究探讨了区分村庄 "特征 "的原则,即在何种情况下对地方进行 "道德制图"。研究结果表明,在对村庄进行官僚特征描述时,最常见的区别特征是1) 居民在解决自身问题或满足行政部门要求方面的独立性;2) 凝聚力以及在治理中帮助或不帮助官僚的意愿。这些分类标志表明了乡村官僚眼中村庄的 "问题性质",即可能发生冲突、投诉和索赔。作者的结论是,官僚对村庄分类的功能之一是应急应对策略,这是农村官僚以任务为导向的工作特点。对居民点居民 "性格 "的了解使官员们能够形成预期、制定工作策略并解释管理上的成功和失败。此外,绘制村庄社会空间分布图的能力对于确认乡村长官,尤其是乡村行政机构负责人的地位也很重要。每天面对行政和物质资源的短缺,农村官僚们发现自己的中间位置很脆弱。然而,对社会空间的 "正确 "认识使他们似乎能够扭转自己的依附地位。至于负责空间的省长,村庄的分类使地方官员有机会展示其对领土的全面了解,从而证明其作为土地 "所有者"(khozyaeva)的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antropologicheskij Forum
Antropologicheskij Forum Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信