Methods to quantify particle air pollution removal by urban vegetation: A review

IF 3.8 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Irene Vigevani , Denise Corsini , Sebastien Comin , Alessio Fini , Francesco Ferrini
{"title":"Methods to quantify particle air pollution removal by urban vegetation: A review","authors":"Irene Vigevani ,&nbsp;Denise Corsini ,&nbsp;Sebastien Comin ,&nbsp;Alessio Fini ,&nbsp;Francesco Ferrini","doi":"10.1016/j.aeaoa.2023.100233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Among the ecosystem services provided by urban forests, the air quality amelioration is particularly relevant. The high level of air pollution in modern cities and the indirect involvement of particulate matter (PM) in the spread of COVID-19 have exacerbated the air quality issue worldwide. However, in the estimation of urban vegetation effectiveness in particle air pollution removal, there is a lack of a standard procedure. Different methods are used for this purpose, making the comparison across different studies difficult. Therefore, there is a need of an extensive review, aimed at: i) identifying the existing direct methods to quantify this ecosystem service, ii) assessing their pros and cons, accuracy and reliability, sustainability, and iii) laying the foundations to create a standard method, commonly and universally recognized. We identified and meticulously assessed five main direct metrics: the gravimetric method (G, 40%), aerosol monitor (AM, 20.5%), wind tunnels and deposition chambers (WT&amp;CH, 19.5%), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM, 14%) and Saturation Isothermal Remanent Magnetization (SIRM, 6%). This work provides a crystal picture and a critical framework of the last thirty years literature on this topic and lays the foundations to create a common and shareable approach to quantify the air PM mitigation potential of the urban vegetation. This will be useful to guide researchers and urban planners in shaping greener, healthier, and more sustainable cities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37150,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment: X","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100233"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590162123000333/pdfft?md5=0dc9f7eed4cca462d9d9e80dfbfa8686&pid=1-s2.0-S2590162123000333-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590162123000333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among the ecosystem services provided by urban forests, the air quality amelioration is particularly relevant. The high level of air pollution in modern cities and the indirect involvement of particulate matter (PM) in the spread of COVID-19 have exacerbated the air quality issue worldwide. However, in the estimation of urban vegetation effectiveness in particle air pollution removal, there is a lack of a standard procedure. Different methods are used for this purpose, making the comparison across different studies difficult. Therefore, there is a need of an extensive review, aimed at: i) identifying the existing direct methods to quantify this ecosystem service, ii) assessing their pros and cons, accuracy and reliability, sustainability, and iii) laying the foundations to create a standard method, commonly and universally recognized. We identified and meticulously assessed five main direct metrics: the gravimetric method (G, 40%), aerosol monitor (AM, 20.5%), wind tunnels and deposition chambers (WT&CH, 19.5%), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM, 14%) and Saturation Isothermal Remanent Magnetization (SIRM, 6%). This work provides a crystal picture and a critical framework of the last thirty years literature on this topic and lays the foundations to create a common and shareable approach to quantify the air PM mitigation potential of the urban vegetation. This will be useful to guide researchers and urban planners in shaping greener, healthier, and more sustainable cities.

量化城市植被去除颗粒空气污染的方法:综述
在城市森林提供的生态系统服务中,改善空气质量尤为重要。现代城市空气污染严重,颗粒物(PM)间接参与了 COVID-19 的传播,加剧了全球的空气质量问题。然而,在估算城市植被去除颗粒物空气污染的效果时,缺乏一个标准的程序。为此采用的方法各不相同,因此很难对不同的研究进行比较。因此,有必要进行一次广泛的审查,目的是:i) 确定现有的量化这种生态系统服务的直接方法;ii) 评估其利弊、准确性和可靠性以及可持续性;iii) 为创建一种普遍公认的标准方法奠定基础。我们确定并仔细评估了五种主要的直接测量方法:重量测量法(G,40%)、气溶胶监测仪(AM,20.5%)、风洞和沉积室(WT&CH,19.5%)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM,14%)和饱和等温剩磁(SIRM,6%)。这项工作为过去三十年有关该主题的文献提供了一幅清晰的图景和一个关键框架,并为创建一种通用和可共享的方法来量化城市植被的空气 PM 缓解潜力奠定了基础。这将有助于指导研究人员和城市规划者塑造更绿色、更健康、更可持续的城市。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Atmospheric Environment: X
Atmospheric Environment: X Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信