Luminescence dating of sand matrices within gravelly fluvial deposits: Assessing the plausibility of beta dose rate calculation

IF 2.9 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Yuji Ishii, Kazumi Ito
{"title":"Luminescence dating of sand matrices within gravelly fluvial deposits: Assessing the plausibility of beta dose rate calculation","authors":"Yuji Ishii,&nbsp;Kazumi Ito","doi":"10.1016/j.qsa.2023.100160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dating of gravelly fluvial deposits is typically hampered by the absence of suitable plant fragments for radiocarbon dating or sand layers for luminescence dating. Although gravelly fluvial deposits generally contain sand-sized quartz and feldspar that could be used for luminescence dating, the considerable grain-to-grain variability in beta dose rate, coupled with the lack of methods for routine dose rate estimation, presents challenges. In this study, a recently proposed model for calculating average beta dose rates in granular matrices was modified to be applicable to sand-sized dosimeter grains within gravelly deposits. We applied the modified model to sand-sized K-rich feldspars within sand matrices obtained from gravelly fluvial deposits in the Tokachi Plain, northern Japan, and compared the ages of samples obtained from sand matrices with those from sand lenses. Although the weight of &lt;2 mm grains accounted for only 20%–35% of the bulk sediment, these grains were estimated to contribute approximately 70% of the external beta dose rate according to the model, because larger grains have a larger self-dose. Taking into account that the beta dose to dosimeter grains is mainly derived from smaller matrices (e.g. &lt;2 mm), beta dose rates were also calculated based on the infinite matrix dose rate of the &lt;2 mm fraction, along with the conventional water correction method. The ages of sand matrices calculated based on the beta dose rates derived from both the model and the infinite matrix dose rate of the &lt;2 mm fraction were generally consistent with those of sand lenses. The dose rate calculated based on the model might be more accurate than that calculated using the infinite matrix dose rate of &lt;2 mm fraction, but calculating the beta dose rate using the infinite matrix dose rate of &lt;2 mm fraction is useful as a simple approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34142,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Science Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666033423000928/pdfft?md5=232ffdfec01e8589cdfb3dd2c5782cbb&pid=1-s2.0-S2666033423000928-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Science Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666033423000928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dating of gravelly fluvial deposits is typically hampered by the absence of suitable plant fragments for radiocarbon dating or sand layers for luminescence dating. Although gravelly fluvial deposits generally contain sand-sized quartz and feldspar that could be used for luminescence dating, the considerable grain-to-grain variability in beta dose rate, coupled with the lack of methods for routine dose rate estimation, presents challenges. In this study, a recently proposed model for calculating average beta dose rates in granular matrices was modified to be applicable to sand-sized dosimeter grains within gravelly deposits. We applied the modified model to sand-sized K-rich feldspars within sand matrices obtained from gravelly fluvial deposits in the Tokachi Plain, northern Japan, and compared the ages of samples obtained from sand matrices with those from sand lenses. Although the weight of <2 mm grains accounted for only 20%–35% of the bulk sediment, these grains were estimated to contribute approximately 70% of the external beta dose rate according to the model, because larger grains have a larger self-dose. Taking into account that the beta dose to dosimeter grains is mainly derived from smaller matrices (e.g. <2 mm), beta dose rates were also calculated based on the infinite matrix dose rate of the <2 mm fraction, along with the conventional water correction method. The ages of sand matrices calculated based on the beta dose rates derived from both the model and the infinite matrix dose rate of the <2 mm fraction were generally consistent with those of sand lenses. The dose rate calculated based on the model might be more accurate than that calculated using the infinite matrix dose rate of <2 mm fraction, but calculating the beta dose rate using the infinite matrix dose rate of <2 mm fraction is useful as a simple approach.

砾质河流沉积物中沙基质的发光测年:评估β剂量率计算的合理性
砾质河流沉积物的测年通常会受到以下因素的影响:缺乏合适的用于放射性碳测年的植物碎片或用于发光测年的砂层。虽然砾质河流沉积通常含有可用于荧光定年的沙粒大小的石英和长石,但颗粒与颗粒之间的贝塔剂量率变化很大,再加上缺乏常规剂量率估算方法,这些都带来了挑战。在这项研究中,我们对最近提出的计算颗粒基质中平均贝塔剂量率的模型进行了修改,使其适用于砾质沉积物中的沙粒大小的剂量计颗粒。我们将修改后的模型应用于从日本北部十胜平原的砾质河流沉积物中获取的砂基质中的砂粒大小的富钾长石,并比较了从砂基质和砂透镜中获取的样本的年龄。虽然 2 毫米颗粒的重量只占大块沉积物的 20%-35% ,但根据模型估算,这些颗粒贡献了大约 70% 的外部贝塔剂量率,因为较大的颗粒具有较大的自剂量。考虑到剂量粒的贝塔剂量主要来自较小的基质(如 2 毫米),贝塔剂量率也是根据 2 毫米部分的无限基质剂量率以及传统的水校正方法计算得出的。根据模型和 2 毫米部分的无限基质剂量率得出的贝塔剂量率计算出的砂基质年龄与砂透镜的年龄基本一致。根据模型计算出的β剂量率可能比使用 2 毫米馏分无限基质剂量率计算出的β剂量率更准确,但使用 2 毫米馏分无限基质剂量率计算β剂量率不失为一种简单的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quaternary Science Advances
Quaternary Science Advances Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信