Blockchain-based governance models supporting corruption-transparency: A systematic literature review

IF 6.9 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Mohammad Mustafa Ibrahimy , Alex Norta , Peeter Normak
{"title":"Blockchain-based governance models supporting corruption-transparency: A systematic literature review","authors":"Mohammad Mustafa Ibrahimy ,&nbsp;Alex Norta ,&nbsp;Peeter Normak","doi":"10.1016/j.bcra.2023.100186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Corruption and lack of transparency remain critical challenges in governance systems around the world. These issues are often perpetuated by centralized systems and their manipulation by system administrators. Furthermore, the lack of data ownership and the monetization of user data by tech companies further increase concerns about transparency. In light of these concerns, this study aims to review existing blockchain-based governance models and identify best-practice governance models focusing on corruption transparency, their characteristics, and components. The research will also examine the role of a token economy in addressing trusted third-party issues related to asset ownership management. Furthermore, we discuss the effect of smart contracts, blockchain, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAO), Web 3.0, and multifactor challenge set self-sovereign identity authentication (MFSSIA) as modern technologies to combat corruption and achieve transparency in the public sector. To achieve this, we conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) comprising peer-reviewed journals, proceedings, and book chapters published between 2012 and 2023. Using the SLR methodology, 45 primary and supporting studies have been selected for result extraction and analysis. Finally, we discovered seven blockchain-based governance models with their characteristics and primary components.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53141,"journal":{"name":"Blockchain-Research and Applications","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100186"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096720923000611/pdfft?md5=edc96a4df5064b154bbd09e79a15db97&pid=1-s2.0-S2096720923000611-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blockchain-Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096720923000611","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corruption and lack of transparency remain critical challenges in governance systems around the world. These issues are often perpetuated by centralized systems and their manipulation by system administrators. Furthermore, the lack of data ownership and the monetization of user data by tech companies further increase concerns about transparency. In light of these concerns, this study aims to review existing blockchain-based governance models and identify best-practice governance models focusing on corruption transparency, their characteristics, and components. The research will also examine the role of a token economy in addressing trusted third-party issues related to asset ownership management. Furthermore, we discuss the effect of smart contracts, blockchain, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAO), Web 3.0, and multifactor challenge set self-sovereign identity authentication (MFSSIA) as modern technologies to combat corruption and achieve transparency in the public sector. To achieve this, we conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) comprising peer-reviewed journals, proceedings, and book chapters published between 2012 and 2023. Using the SLR methodology, 45 primary and supporting studies have been selected for result extraction and analysis. Finally, we discovered seven blockchain-based governance models with their characteristics and primary components.

支持腐败透明的区块链治理模式:系统性文献综述
腐败和缺乏透明度仍然是世界各地治理系统面临的严峻挑战。这些问题往往因集中式系统及其被系统管理员操纵而长期存在。此外,数据所有权的缺失和科技公司对用户数据的货币化进一步增加了人们对透明度的担忧。鉴于这些问题,本研究旨在审查现有的基于区块链的治理模式,并确定最佳实践治理模式,重点关注腐败透明度、其特点和组成部分。本研究还将探讨代币经济在解决与资产所有权管理相关的可信第三方问题中的作用。此外,我们还将讨论智能合约、区块链、去中心化自治组织(DAO)、Web 3.0 和多因素挑战集自我主权身份验证(MFSSIA)作为现代技术对打击腐败和实现公共部门透明度的影响。为此,我们进行了一次系统的文献综述(SLR),包括 2012 年至 2023 年间出版的同行评审期刊、论文集和书籍章节。利用 SLR 方法,我们选择了 45 项主要研究和辅助研究进行成果提取和分析。最后,我们发现了七种基于区块链的治理模式及其特点和主要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Blockchain: Research and Applications is an international, peer reviewed journal for researchers, engineers, and practitioners to present the latest advances and innovations in blockchain research. The journal publishes theoretical and applied papers in established and emerging areas of blockchain research to shape the future of blockchain technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信