Association between frailty and in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: A nationwide analysis

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Carlos Diaz-Arocutipa MD , Pablo M. Calderon-Ramirez MD , Frank Mayta-Tovalino PhD , Javier Torres-Valencia MD
{"title":"Association between frailty and in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: A nationwide analysis","authors":"Carlos Diaz-Arocutipa MD ,&nbsp;Pablo M. Calderon-Ramirez MD ,&nbsp;Frank Mayta-Tovalino PhD ,&nbsp;Javier Torres-Valencia MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2023.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Leadless pacing has recently emerged as a promising therapy. The impact of frailty on the prognosis of these patients is currently unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to assess the association between frailty and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We included adult patients who underwent leadless pacemaker implantation using the National Inpatient Sample from 2017 to 2019. Frailty was evaluated using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score and stratified into low, intermediate, and high risk. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and any complication (vascular, pericardial, pneumothorax, infectious, or device related), and secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay and total charges.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 16,825 patients were included in the final analysis, with 62% at intermediate or high risk of frailty. There was a higher risk of in-hospital mortality in patients at high (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 6.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.31–12.26) or intermediate (aRR 5.15, 95% CI 3.04–8.72) risk of frailty compared with those at low risk. Similarly, those at high or intermediate risk of frailty had higher total expenses and stayed in the hospital longer. Patients with a high (aRR 1.14, 95% CI 0.71–1.81) or intermediate (aRR 1.19, 95% CI 0.94–1.51) risk of frailty had a similar risk of any complication as patients with a low risk.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Frailty was common in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation. Higher levels of frailty were a strong predictor of in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, and hospital charges, except for any complication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 85-94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501823003379/pdfft?md5=1ac8f43b3e9218f9e26d6b988a4e56ad&pid=1-s2.0-S2666501823003379-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501823003379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Leadless pacing has recently emerged as a promising therapy. The impact of frailty on the prognosis of these patients is currently unknown.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the association between frailty and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation.

Methods

We included adult patients who underwent leadless pacemaker implantation using the National Inpatient Sample from 2017 to 2019. Frailty was evaluated using the Hospital Frailty Risk Score and stratified into low, intermediate, and high risk. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and any complication (vascular, pericardial, pneumothorax, infectious, or device related), and secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay and total charges.

Results

A total of 16,825 patients were included in the final analysis, with 62% at intermediate or high risk of frailty. There was a higher risk of in-hospital mortality in patients at high (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 6.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.31–12.26) or intermediate (aRR 5.15, 95% CI 3.04–8.72) risk of frailty compared with those at low risk. Similarly, those at high or intermediate risk of frailty had higher total expenses and stayed in the hospital longer. Patients with a high (aRR 1.14, 95% CI 0.71–1.81) or intermediate (aRR 1.19, 95% CI 0.94–1.51) risk of frailty had a similar risk of any complication as patients with a low risk.

Conclusion

Frailty was common in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation. Higher levels of frailty were a strong predictor of in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, and hospital charges, except for any complication.

无导线起搏器植入术患者的虚弱程度与院内预后之间的关系:全国性分析
背景无导联起搏最近已成为一种很有前景的治疗方法。本研究的目的是评估接受无导线起搏器植入术的患者的虚弱程度与临床预后之间的关系。方法我们纳入了 2017 年至 2019 年期间使用全国住院患者样本接受无导线起搏器植入术的成年患者。采用医院虚弱风险评分对虚弱程度进行评估,并将其分为低、中、高风险。主要结果为院内死亡率和任何并发症(血管、心包、气胸、感染或设备相关),次要结果为住院时间和总费用。结果 共有16825名患者纳入最终分析,其中62%的患者存在中度或高度虚弱风险。与低风险患者相比,高风险(调整风险比 [aRR] 6.37,95% 置信区间 [CI] 3.31-12.26)或中度风险(aRR 5.15,95% 置信区间 [CI] 3.04-8.72)患者的院内死亡风险更高。同样,体弱高风险或中度风险患者的总费用更高,住院时间更长。高风险(aRR 1.14,95% CI 0.71-1.81)或中度风险(aRR 1.19,95% CI 0.94-1.51)患者发生任何并发症的风险与低风险患者相似。除任何并发症外,较高的体弱程度是院内死亡率、住院时间和住院费用的有力预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart Rhythm O2
Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信