Critical Analysis of Sunni Theological Schools' Views on Divine Justice from the Perspective of Shahid Motahhari

Elham Zarinkolah
{"title":"Critical Analysis of Sunni Theological Schools' Views on Divine Justice from the Perspective of Shahid Motahhari","authors":"Elham Zarinkolah","doi":"10.18415/ijmmu.v10i12.5402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the topics that \"Ash'areh, Mu'tazila, and Imamiyyah\" have put at the forefront of their discussions for specific religious and historical reasons is divine justice, which means that God acts righteously in the system of creation and legislation. In this article, by using the library method and data analysis, while expressing Shahid Motahhari's point of view on the semantics of the word justice, the point of view of Sunni theological schools in this regard has been analyzed, and the conclusion has been reached that Shahid Motahhari has given four meanings for this word: balance, equality, respect for rights, and respect for entitlements. He, after criticizing the views of the Ash'areh - which favors determinism and necessity and the incompatibility of justice with intrinsic monotheism - and the Mu'tazila - who favors justice and free will - puts forward the Imamiyyah view, which is the principle of justice without damage to verbal and intrinsic monotheism by affirming the free will of man, and considers it a superior view.","PeriodicalId":14024,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding","volume":"42 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i12.5402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the topics that "Ash'areh, Mu'tazila, and Imamiyyah" have put at the forefront of their discussions for specific religious and historical reasons is divine justice, which means that God acts righteously in the system of creation and legislation. In this article, by using the library method and data analysis, while expressing Shahid Motahhari's point of view on the semantics of the word justice, the point of view of Sunni theological schools in this regard has been analyzed, and the conclusion has been reached that Shahid Motahhari has given four meanings for this word: balance, equality, respect for rights, and respect for entitlements. He, after criticizing the views of the Ash'areh - which favors determinism and necessity and the incompatibility of justice with intrinsic monotheism - and the Mu'tazila - who favors justice and free will - puts forward the Imamiyyah view, which is the principle of justice without damage to verbal and intrinsic monotheism by affirming the free will of man, and considers it a superior view.
从沙希德-莫塔哈里的视角批判分析逊尼派神学流派的天主正义观
出于特定的宗教和历史原因,"阿什派、穆塔兹拉派和伊玛目派 "将神的正义(即真主在创世和立法体系中的正义行为)作为其讨论的首要议题之一。本文通过图书馆方法和数据分析,在表达沙希德-莫塔哈里关于正义一词语义的观点的同时,分析了逊尼派神学流派在这方面的观点,得出的结论是沙希德-莫塔哈里为这个词赋予了四种含义:平衡、平等、尊重权利和尊重应享权利。他批判了阿什派和穆塔齐拉派的观点,前者主张决定论和必然性,认为正义与内在的一神论不相容,后者主张正义和自由意志,之后他提出了伊玛目派的观点,即通过肯定人的自由意志,在不损害言语和内在一神论的情况下实现正义的原则,并认为这是一种更优越的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信