Performance modeling and multi-objective optimization during turning AISI 304 stainless steel using coated and coated-microblasted tools

S. Chinchanikar, Mahendra Gadge
{"title":"Performance modeling and multi-objective optimization during turning AISI 304 stainless steel using coated and coated-microblasted tools","authors":"S. Chinchanikar, Mahendra Gadge","doi":"10.17212/1994-6309-2023-25.4-117-135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. High-speed machining of stainless steel has long been a focus of research. Due to characteristics such as low thermal conductivity and work hardening, AISI 304 is considered to be a difficult material to cut. Machinability indicators provide important information about the efficiency and effectiveness of the machining process, enabling manufacturers to optimize their operations for increased productivity and precision. The purpose of the work. Coated carbide tools are most often used for machining AISI 304 stainless steel. Few studies, meanwhile, have examined the effects of pre-and post-treated coated carbide tools when turning these alloys at high speeds. In addition, only a small number of studies have simultaneously optimized the cutting parameters while employing pre-and post-treated tools. The methods of investigation. The present work comparatively evaluates the performance of coated and coated-microblasted tools during the turning of AISI 304 stainless steel. The tools were PVD-AlTiN coated, PVD-AlTiN coated with microblasting as a post-treatment (coated-microblasted), and MTCVD-TiCN/Al2O3 coated (MTCVD). The experimental-based mathematical models were developed to predict and optimize the turning performance. Results and Discussion. In this study, it is found that PVD-AlTiN coated tools have the lowest cutting forces and surface roughness, followed by PVD-AlTiN coated-microblasted and MTCVD-TiCN/Al2O3 coated tools. However, there is no significant difference observed in these responses for coated and coated-microblasted tools. It is found that the cutting forces increased with feed and depth of cut while decreasing with cutting speed. However, this effect is significant for MTCVD-coated tools. On the other hand, higher tool life is observed with MTCVD-TiCN/Al2O3 coated tools, followed by PVD AlTiN coated-microblasted and PVD-AlTiN coated tools. Tool life was largely affected by cutting speed. However, PVD-AlTiN coated tools exhibited this effect more noticeably. The models, with correlation coefficients found above 0.9, can be utilized to predict responses in turning AISI 304 stainless steel. The optimization study revealed that turning AISI 304 stainless steel with MTCVD-TiCN/Al2O3 coated tools incurs lower cutting forces of 18–27 N, produces a minimum surface roughness of 0.3–0.44 μm, and has a better tool life of 36–51 min compared to PVD-AlTiN coated (C) and PVD-AlTiN coated-microblasted (CMB) tools.","PeriodicalId":502919,"journal":{"name":"Metal Working and Material Science","volume":"8 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metal Working and Material Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17212/1994-6309-2023-25.4-117-135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. High-speed machining of stainless steel has long been a focus of research. Due to characteristics such as low thermal conductivity and work hardening, AISI 304 is considered to be a difficult material to cut. Machinability indicators provide important information about the efficiency and effectiveness of the machining process, enabling manufacturers to optimize their operations for increased productivity and precision. The purpose of the work. Coated carbide tools are most often used for machining AISI 304 stainless steel. Few studies, meanwhile, have examined the effects of pre-and post-treated coated carbide tools when turning these alloys at high speeds. In addition, only a small number of studies have simultaneously optimized the cutting parameters while employing pre-and post-treated tools. The methods of investigation. The present work comparatively evaluates the performance of coated and coated-microblasted tools during the turning of AISI 304 stainless steel. The tools were PVD-AlTiN coated, PVD-AlTiN coated with microblasting as a post-treatment (coated-microblasted), and MTCVD-TiCN/Al2O3 coated (MTCVD). The experimental-based mathematical models were developed to predict and optimize the turning performance. Results and Discussion. In this study, it is found that PVD-AlTiN coated tools have the lowest cutting forces and surface roughness, followed by PVD-AlTiN coated-microblasted and MTCVD-TiCN/Al2O3 coated tools. However, there is no significant difference observed in these responses for coated and coated-microblasted tools. It is found that the cutting forces increased with feed and depth of cut while decreasing with cutting speed. However, this effect is significant for MTCVD-coated tools. On the other hand, higher tool life is observed with MTCVD-TiCN/Al2O3 coated tools, followed by PVD AlTiN coated-microblasted and PVD-AlTiN coated tools. Tool life was largely affected by cutting speed. However, PVD-AlTiN coated tools exhibited this effect more noticeably. The models, with correlation coefficients found above 0.9, can be utilized to predict responses in turning AISI 304 stainless steel. The optimization study revealed that turning AISI 304 stainless steel with MTCVD-TiCN/Al2O3 coated tools incurs lower cutting forces of 18–27 N, produces a minimum surface roughness of 0.3–0.44 μm, and has a better tool life of 36–51 min compared to PVD-AlTiN coated (C) and PVD-AlTiN coated-microblasted (CMB) tools.
使用涂层和涂层微喷丸刀具车削 AISI 304 不锈钢时的性能建模和多目标优化
简介不锈钢的高速加工一直是研究的重点。由于具有低导热性和加工硬化等特点,AISI 304 被认为是一种难以切削的材料。可切削性指标提供了有关加工过程效率和效果的重要信息,使制造商能够优化操作,提高生产率和精度。工作目的。涂层硬质合金刀具最常用于加工 AISI 304 不锈钢。与此同时,很少有研究探讨高速车削这些合金时,预处理和后处理涂层硬质合金刀具的效果。此外,只有少数研究在使用预处理和后处理刀具时同时优化了切削参数。调查方法本研究对 AISI 304 不锈钢车削过程中涂层和涂层微喷丸刀具的性能进行了比较评估。工具分别为 PVD-AlTiN 涂层、PVD-AlTiN 涂层后微喷处理(涂层-微喷)和 MTCVD-TiCN/Al2O3 涂层(MTCVD)。建立了基于实验的数学模型来预测和优化车削性能。结果与讨论。研究发现,PVD-AlTiN 涂层刀具的切削力和表面粗糙度最低,其次是 PVD-AlTiN 涂层-微喷丸和 MTCVD-TiCN/Al2O3 涂层刀具。不过,在这些反应中,涂层和涂层-微喷丸刀具没有明显差异。研究发现,切削力随进给量和切削深度的增加而增加,随切削速度的增加而减小。不过,这种影响对于 MTCVD 涂层刀具来说非常明显。另一方面,MTCVD-TiCN/Al2O3 涂层刀具的刀具寿命更高,其次是 PVD AlTiN 涂层微喷丸刀具和 PVD-AlTiN 涂层刀具。刀具寿命在很大程度上受切削速度的影响。不过,PVD-AlTiN 涂层刀具的影响更为明显。这些模型的相关系数高于 0.9,可用于预测车削 AISI 304 不锈钢时的反应。优化研究表明,与 PVD-AlTiN 涂层 (C) 和 PVD-AlTiN 涂层微喷丸 (CMB) 刀具相比,使用 MTCVD-TiCN/Al2O3 涂层刀具车削 AISI 304 不锈钢产生的切削力更低,为 18-27 N,产生的表面粗糙度最小,为 0.3-0.44 μm,刀具寿命更长,为 36-51 min。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信