Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy using the StimaWELL 120MTRS system on erector spinae morphology in patients with chronic low back pain

Loïck Balthazard, Daniel Wolfe, Maryse Fortin
{"title":"Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy using the StimaWELL 120MTRS system on erector spinae morphology in patients with chronic low back pain","authors":"Loïck Balthazard, Daniel Wolfe, Maryse Fortin","doi":"10.3389/fmscd.2023.1240331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic low-back pain (CLBP) is the leading cause of disability globally. CLBP is associated with a decrease in cross-sectional area (CSA) and an increase in fat infiltration (FI) of the lumbar paraspinal muscles, such as erector spinae (ES). Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) therapy showed promising outcomes in the treatment of CLBP, but its impact on ES morphology is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effect of two NMES protocols on ES CSA and FI in a cohort of patients with CLBP.Twenty participants with CLBP (aged 18–60 years old) were randomized into the phasic (n = 11) or the combined (n = 9) protocol groups. They completed a 10-week (20 sessions) NMES therapy using the StimaWELL 120MTRS device. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were acquired at baseline and post-intervention to assess ES CSA and FI at all spinal levels (e.g., L1–L2 to L5–S1). Statistical analyses were conducted to assess the effect of the intervention on ES morphology irrespective of groups, and between groups.Irrespective of groups, participants showed a decrease in left ES CSA (p = 0.005) at L2–L3 and left ES FI at L5–S1 (p = 0.040). We also observed a greater decrease in ES FI in the combined protocol compared to the phasic protocol on the right side at L3–L4 (p = 0.029) and L4–L5 (p = 0.015). No other changes in ES CSA or FI were observed (p > 0.05).NMES therapy demonstrated minimal effect on ES morphology in patients with CLBP. Further research is needed to extend and confirm our findings.","PeriodicalId":507589,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmscd.2023.1240331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic low-back pain (CLBP) is the leading cause of disability globally. CLBP is associated with a decrease in cross-sectional area (CSA) and an increase in fat infiltration (FI) of the lumbar paraspinal muscles, such as erector spinae (ES). Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) therapy showed promising outcomes in the treatment of CLBP, but its impact on ES morphology is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effect of two NMES protocols on ES CSA and FI in a cohort of patients with CLBP.Twenty participants with CLBP (aged 18–60 years old) were randomized into the phasic (n = 11) or the combined (n = 9) protocol groups. They completed a 10-week (20 sessions) NMES therapy using the StimaWELL 120MTRS device. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were acquired at baseline and post-intervention to assess ES CSA and FI at all spinal levels (e.g., L1–L2 to L5–S1). Statistical analyses were conducted to assess the effect of the intervention on ES morphology irrespective of groups, and between groups.Irrespective of groups, participants showed a decrease in left ES CSA (p = 0.005) at L2–L3 and left ES FI at L5–S1 (p = 0.040). We also observed a greater decrease in ES FI in the combined protocol compared to the phasic protocol on the right side at L3–L4 (p = 0.029) and L4–L5 (p = 0.015). No other changes in ES CSA or FI were observed (p > 0.05).NMES therapy demonstrated minimal effect on ES morphology in patients with CLBP. Further research is needed to extend and confirm our findings.
使用 StimaWELL 120MTRS 系统的神经肌肉电刺激疗法对慢性腰痛患者竖脊肌形态的影响
慢性腰背痛(CLBP)是导致全球残疾的主要原因。慢性腰背痛与腰椎旁肌肉(如竖脊肌)横截面积(CSA)的减少和脂肪浸润(FI)的增加有关。神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)疗法在治疗腰背痛方面取得了良好的效果,但其对 ES 形态的影响尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在比较两种 NMES 方案对一组 CLBP 患者的 ES CSA 和 FI 的影响。20 名 CLBP 患者(18-60 岁)被随机分为相位方案组(n = 11)或联合方案组(n = 9)。他们使用 StimaWELL 120MTRS 设备完成了为期 10 周(20 次)的 NMES 治疗。在基线和干预后进行磁共振成像(MRI)检查,以评估所有脊柱水平(如 L1-L2 至 L5-S1)的 ES CSA 和 FI。我们进行了统计分析,以评估干预对ES形态的影响(不分组别)和组间影响。我们还观察到,在 L3-L4 (p = 0.029)和 L4-L5 (p = 0.015)处,联合方案与相位方案相比,右侧 ES FI 的下降幅度更大。没有观察到 ES CSA 或 FI 发生其他变化(p > 0.05)。NMES疗法对CLBP患者的ES形态学影响甚微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信