{"title":"Will the zombie box eat your brains for breakfast?","authors":"S. Tikhonova, D. Artamonov","doi":"10.18500/1819-7671-2023-23-4-480-484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The review is devoted to the publication of the book “Cyberhumanism. How communication technologies transform our society” by Nizhny Novgorod researcher A. N. Fortunatov – the Doctor of Philosophy, specialist in the field of communication studies, media philosophy and the history of television. Theoretical analysis. In the book by A. N. Fortunatov, methodological principles of communicative theory, media philosophy and humanism as a philosophical trend were combined. The result was the emergence of the term \"cyberhumanism\", which serves as a characteristic of the aggressive nature of communication technologies aimed, according to the author, at subordinating a person to digital means of communication and media. The author claims that the digital transformation of society is a natural phenomenon that arose as a result of the development of scientific and technological progress, however, the “callousness” of the digital sphere negatively affects the personality, that becomes only a reflection of the media. A. N. Fortunatov shows how digital media reality is constructed, where the subject and the object change places. A person ceases to be a subject in interaction with the media, since it is not he who influences them, but, on the contrary, the means of communication subordinate him to their will and the logic of existence. Conclusion. Such an ambiguous approach to the consideration of the phenomenon of media constitutes the research value of the book, which may be of interest to a wide range of readers dealing with the problems of digital society.","PeriodicalId":252065,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy","volume":"120 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2023-23-4-480-484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction. The review is devoted to the publication of the book “Cyberhumanism. How communication technologies transform our society” by Nizhny Novgorod researcher A. N. Fortunatov – the Doctor of Philosophy, specialist in the field of communication studies, media philosophy and the history of television. Theoretical analysis. In the book by A. N. Fortunatov, methodological principles of communicative theory, media philosophy and humanism as a philosophical trend were combined. The result was the emergence of the term "cyberhumanism", which serves as a characteristic of the aggressive nature of communication technologies aimed, according to the author, at subordinating a person to digital means of communication and media. The author claims that the digital transformation of society is a natural phenomenon that arose as a result of the development of scientific and technological progress, however, the “callousness” of the digital sphere negatively affects the personality, that becomes only a reflection of the media. A. N. Fortunatov shows how digital media reality is constructed, where the subject and the object change places. A person ceases to be a subject in interaction with the media, since it is not he who influences them, but, on the contrary, the means of communication subordinate him to their will and the logic of existence. Conclusion. Such an ambiguous approach to the consideration of the phenomenon of media constitutes the research value of the book, which may be of interest to a wide range of readers dealing with the problems of digital society.
导言。这篇评论是关于下诺夫哥罗德研究员阿-尼-福尔图纳托夫(A. N. Fortunatov)出版的《网络人文主义:通信技术如何改变我们的社会》一书。下诺夫哥罗德研究员、哲学博士、传播学、媒体哲学和电视史专家阿-尼-福图纳托夫所著的《传播技术如何改变我们的社会》一书。理论分析。在 A. N. Fortunatov 的著作中,传播理论、媒体哲学和人文主义作为一种哲学思潮的方法论原则被结合在一起。其结果是出现了 "网络人文主义 "这一术语。作者认为,该术语是传播技术侵略性的特征,其目的是使人从属于数字传播手段和媒体。作者认为,社会的数字化转型是科技进步所带来的自然现象,然而,数字化领域的 "冷酷无情 "却对人格产生了负面影响,使其沦为媒体的倒影。阿-尼-福图纳托夫展示了数字媒体是如何构建现实的,其中主体和客体的位置发生了变化。人在与媒体的互动中不再是主体,因为不是他影响媒体,而是相反,传播手段让他服从媒体的意志和存在逻辑。结论。以这种模棱两可的方式探讨媒体现象,是本书的研究价值所在,广大读者在研究数字社会问题时可能会对本书感兴趣。