Quality evaluation of chicken patties marinated with roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) calyx extract

I. A. Okere, Olubunmi Olufemi Olusola
{"title":"Quality evaluation of chicken patties marinated with roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) calyx extract","authors":"I. A. Okere, Olubunmi Olufemi Olusola","doi":"10.17508/cjfst.2023.15.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The potential of extract from roselle calyx on quality attributes of chicken patties marinated without extracts [plain (P1) and prepared with 0.01% butyl hydroxyl anisole; BHA (P2)] and with extract [soaked in roselle calyx extracts concentrations at 0.005% (P3), 0.01% (P4), 0.015% (P5) and 0.02% (P6)] were evaluated. Sensory qualities, cooking loss, product yield and colour [lightness (L*), redness (a*) and yellowness (b*)] were determined on freshly prepared patties and the production cost was evaluated. Total bacterial count, TBC (log10 CFU/g), water holding capacity; WHC (%), pH and lipid oxidation (mg MDA/kg) were determined on days 0, 7, 14 and 21 of cold (4 °C) storage. Patties flavour of 5.65±0.01 (P6) was higher (p<0.05) than in other treatments and the least in P1 (3.96±0.23). Cooking loss ranged from 20.24± 0.11% (P6) to 26.55± 0.01% (P1). Product yield of 79.8±0.7% (P6) was the highest, which varied significantly from other treatments. Lightness in P1 - P6 was darker than normal, with the highest L* = 42± 2.43 (P1) and the least L* = 36.44± 0.15 (P6). Redness was the least in P1 (a* = 16.85± 1.32), which varied significantly (p<0.05) from other treatments. Yellowness in P2 (b* = 54.14±1.35) was the highest, which differs significantly (p<0.05) from other treatments. Production cost varied insignificantly (p>0.05) among the treatments, with (P2 - P6) being significantly (p<0.05) higher than P1, with increasing percentage gain ranging from 0.02% (P2) to 0.78% (P6) relative to P1. On day 21, there were variations (p<0.05) in range for TBC [0.30±0.03 (P6) to 0.48±0.03 (P1)], and WHC [68.78±0.27 (P1) to 80.96±0.37 (P6)], pH [5.21±0.13 (P6) to 5.70±0.18 (P1)]. Lipid oxidation of 0.39±0.04 (P2) and 0.41±0.04 (P6) was similar, but significantly lower than 0.61±0.01 (P3), 0.59±0.04 (P4) and 0.46±0.01 (P5). Thus, among all patties marinated with extracts, those with 0.02% roselle calyx extract maintained better quality, inhibited lipid oxidation and bacteria during storage.","PeriodicalId":10771,"journal":{"name":"Croatian journal of food science and technology","volume":"300 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian journal of food science and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17508/cjfst.2023.15.2.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The potential of extract from roselle calyx on quality attributes of chicken patties marinated without extracts [plain (P1) and prepared with 0.01% butyl hydroxyl anisole; BHA (P2)] and with extract [soaked in roselle calyx extracts concentrations at 0.005% (P3), 0.01% (P4), 0.015% (P5) and 0.02% (P6)] were evaluated. Sensory qualities, cooking loss, product yield and colour [lightness (L*), redness (a*) and yellowness (b*)] were determined on freshly prepared patties and the production cost was evaluated. Total bacterial count, TBC (log10 CFU/g), water holding capacity; WHC (%), pH and lipid oxidation (mg MDA/kg) were determined on days 0, 7, 14 and 21 of cold (4 °C) storage. Patties flavour of 5.65±0.01 (P6) was higher (p<0.05) than in other treatments and the least in P1 (3.96±0.23). Cooking loss ranged from 20.24± 0.11% (P6) to 26.55± 0.01% (P1). Product yield of 79.8±0.7% (P6) was the highest, which varied significantly from other treatments. Lightness in P1 - P6 was darker than normal, with the highest L* = 42± 2.43 (P1) and the least L* = 36.44± 0.15 (P6). Redness was the least in P1 (a* = 16.85± 1.32), which varied significantly (p<0.05) from other treatments. Yellowness in P2 (b* = 54.14±1.35) was the highest, which differs significantly (p<0.05) from other treatments. Production cost varied insignificantly (p>0.05) among the treatments, with (P2 - P6) being significantly (p<0.05) higher than P1, with increasing percentage gain ranging from 0.02% (P2) to 0.78% (P6) relative to P1. On day 21, there were variations (p<0.05) in range for TBC [0.30±0.03 (P6) to 0.48±0.03 (P1)], and WHC [68.78±0.27 (P1) to 80.96±0.37 (P6)], pH [5.21±0.13 (P6) to 5.70±0.18 (P1)]. Lipid oxidation of 0.39±0.04 (P2) and 0.41±0.04 (P6) was similar, but significantly lower than 0.61±0.01 (P3), 0.59±0.04 (P4) and 0.46±0.01 (P5). Thus, among all patties marinated with extracts, those with 0.02% roselle calyx extract maintained better quality, inhibited lipid oxidation and bacteria during storage.
用洛神花(Hibiscus sabdariffa L.)花萼提取物腌制鸡肉饼的质量评价
评估了洛神花萼提取物对不含提取物[原味(P1)和用 0.01% 丁基羟基苯甲醚(BHA)制备(P2)]和含提取物[浸泡在浓度为 0.005%(P3)、0.01%(P4)、0.015%(P5)和 0.02%(P6)的洛神花萼提取物中]腌制的鸡肉馅饼质量属性的影响。对新鲜制备的糍粑的感官质量、烹饪损失、产品产量和颜色[亮度(L*)、红度(a*)和黄度(b*)]进行了测定,并对生产成本进行了评估。在冷藏(4 °C)的第 0、7、14 和 21 天测定了细菌总数、TBC(log10 CFU/g)、持水量;WHC(%)、pH 值和脂质氧化(mg MDA/kg)。各处理的糍粑风味为 5.65±0.01(P6),高于 P1(p0.05),(P2 - P6)显著高于 P1(p<0.05),相对于 P1 的增重百分比从 0.02%(P2)到 0.78%(P6)不等。第 21 天,TBC [0.30±0.03 (P6) to 0.48±0.03 (P1)]、WHC [68.78±0.27 (P1) to 80.96±0.37 (P6)]、pH [5.21±0.13 (P6) to 5.70±0.18 (P1)]的范围有变化(p<0.05)。脂质氧化值为 0.39±0.04(P2)和 0.41±0.04(P6),与 0.61±0.01(P3)、0.59±0.04(P4)和 0.46±0.01(P5)相似,但明显低于 0.61±0.01(P3)、0.59±0.04(P4)和 0.46±0.01(P5)。因此,在所有用提取物腌制的糍粑中,用 0.02% 的洛神花萼提取物腌制的糍粑在贮藏期间能保持较好的质量,抑制脂质氧化和细菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信