Antimicrobial Effectiveness of Propolis and Probiotics Combination as Root Canal Medicament against Enterococcus faecalis

Salma Rizki Insyira, Arya Adiningrat, Ikhsan Maulana
{"title":"Antimicrobial Effectiveness of Propolis and Probiotics Combination as Root Canal Medicament against Enterococcus faecalis","authors":"Salma Rizki Insyira, Arya Adiningrat, Ikhsan Maulana","doi":"10.31983/jkg.v10i2.9871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The application of intracanal medicaments is essential to support root canal sterilization against intrusive bacteria, which can easily penetrate and remain survive in the dentinal tubules. Root canal medicament is expected to penetrate tubules and eradicate the bacteria, leading to prognosis improvement of endodontic treatment. There is an upcoming consideration on using natural substance as an alternative root canal medicament, due to the side effects potency of chemical-based medicament. Propolis and probiotics are two natural promising antimicrobial and health beneficial substance to consider. This study aims to evaluate antimicrobial capacity of probiotics and with propolis combination as potential medicaments against Enterococcus faecalis. Eighteen extracted human second premolars were sectioned 8 mm below the CEJ. The dentin blocks were then prepared under the similar dimensional standards. E. faecalis was used in the dentin blocks preconditioning incubation for 12h. The samples were classified into six groups (n = 3). Group 1: untreated; Group 2: Ca(OH)2; Group 3: Ca(OH)2 + probiotics; Group 4: Ca(OH)2 + 1% water-based propolis (WEP); Group 5: probiotics; and Group 6: 1% WEP + probiotics. The grinded dentin was collected and recultivated. The number of cultivated bacteria was further counted. The results showed that the CFU was significantly lower in all groups compared to the untreated, but not significantly different between groups. Although they were not significantly different, probiotics and combined treatments exhibited lower CFU than the sole Ca(OH)2.","PeriodicalId":417742,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Kesehatan Gigi","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Kesehatan Gigi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31983/jkg.v10i2.9871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application of intracanal medicaments is essential to support root canal sterilization against intrusive bacteria, which can easily penetrate and remain survive in the dentinal tubules. Root canal medicament is expected to penetrate tubules and eradicate the bacteria, leading to prognosis improvement of endodontic treatment. There is an upcoming consideration on using natural substance as an alternative root canal medicament, due to the side effects potency of chemical-based medicament. Propolis and probiotics are two natural promising antimicrobial and health beneficial substance to consider. This study aims to evaluate antimicrobial capacity of probiotics and with propolis combination as potential medicaments against Enterococcus faecalis. Eighteen extracted human second premolars were sectioned 8 mm below the CEJ. The dentin blocks were then prepared under the similar dimensional standards. E. faecalis was used in the dentin blocks preconditioning incubation for 12h. The samples were classified into six groups (n = 3). Group 1: untreated; Group 2: Ca(OH)2; Group 3: Ca(OH)2 + probiotics; Group 4: Ca(OH)2 + 1% water-based propolis (WEP); Group 5: probiotics; and Group 6: 1% WEP + probiotics. The grinded dentin was collected and recultivated. The number of cultivated bacteria was further counted. The results showed that the CFU was significantly lower in all groups compared to the untreated, but not significantly different between groups. Although they were not significantly different, probiotics and combined treatments exhibited lower CFU than the sole Ca(OH)2.
蜂胶和益生菌组合作为根管药物对粪肠球菌的抗菌效果
根管内用药对于根管杀菌至关重要,因为侵入的细菌很容易穿透并存活在牙本质小管内。根管药物有望穿透牙管并消灭细菌,从而改善牙髓治疗的预后。由于化学药物的副作用,人们即将考虑使用天然物质作为根管治疗药物的替代品。蜂胶和益生菌是两种值得考虑的抗菌和有益健康的天然物质。本研究旨在评估益生菌和蜂胶组合作为潜在药物对粪肠球菌的抗菌能力。18 颗拔出的人类第二前臼齿在 CEJ 下 8 毫米处切片。然后按照类似的尺寸标准制备牙本质块。将粪肠球菌用于牙本质块预处理培养 12 小时。样本分为六组(n = 3)。第 1 组:未处理;第 2 组:Ca(OH)2;第 3 组:Ca(OH)2:Ca(OH)2;第 3 组:Ca(OH)2 + 益生菌;第 4 组:Ca(OH)2 + 1%水基蜂胶(WEP);第 5 组:益生菌;第 6 组:1%水基蜂胶 + 益生菌。收集磨碎的牙本质并进行再培养。培养细菌的数量被进一步计数。结果显示,与未经处理的牙本质相比,各组的 CFU 都明显降低,但组间差异不大。虽然没有明显差异,但益生菌和联合处理的 CFU 都比单独使用 Ca(OH)2 的低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信