Success and Learning Strategies: A Survey of Students at the Faculty of Dentistry in Casablanca

S. Benfaida, Zineb Al Jalil, Souad Chaouir, Anas Bennani
{"title":"Success and Learning Strategies: A Survey of Students at the Faculty of Dentistry in Casablanca","authors":"S. Benfaida, Zineb Al Jalil, Souad Chaouir, Anas Bennani","doi":"10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.6.756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the learning strategies used by the students of the 2nd year of the Faculty of Dentistry in Casablanca. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted among second-year dental students after informed consent. A modified WOLF questionnaire, “My intellectual work tools,” was distributed. It included 37 closed questions on self-reported study practices in four categories: cognitive, metacognitive, affective, and resource management. Data entry and statistical analysis were performed using SPSS software in the Laboratory of Community Health Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Results: 86.9% of students were active in meaning-making, reformulation, and exemplification. 9.7% mastered highlighting relationships and structuring. 42.8% reorganized information according to personal criteria. For memorization, the students used both types with a predominance of the appropriative form. For metacognitive, affective, and management strategies, 21.4% systematically anticipated evaluation situations. For time management, 12.4% planned and managed their time regularly. In terms of self-confidence, 17.2% stated that they had complete self-confidence. Conclusion: Except for memorization and comprehension strategies, all the tools assessed were little used and/or not mastered by the students. To help students master these strategies, increased use of differentiated pedagogies such as flipped classrooms and MOOCS, and OSCE assessments should take place. Workshops and seminars on learning strategies should be provided to reinforce the course administered in the first year.","PeriodicalId":503832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education and Pedagogy","volume":"24 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education and Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.6.756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the learning strategies used by the students of the 2nd year of the Faculty of Dentistry in Casablanca. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted among second-year dental students after informed consent. A modified WOLF questionnaire, “My intellectual work tools,” was distributed. It included 37 closed questions on self-reported study practices in four categories: cognitive, metacognitive, affective, and resource management. Data entry and statistical analysis were performed using SPSS software in the Laboratory of Community Health Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Results: 86.9% of students were active in meaning-making, reformulation, and exemplification. 9.7% mastered highlighting relationships and structuring. 42.8% reorganized information according to personal criteria. For memorization, the students used both types with a predominance of the appropriative form. For metacognitive, affective, and management strategies, 21.4% systematically anticipated evaluation situations. For time management, 12.4% planned and managed their time regularly. In terms of self-confidence, 17.2% stated that they had complete self-confidence. Conclusion: Except for memorization and comprehension strategies, all the tools assessed were little used and/or not mastered by the students. To help students master these strategies, increased use of differentiated pedagogies such as flipped classrooms and MOOCS, and OSCE assessments should take place. Workshops and seminars on learning strategies should be provided to reinforce the course administered in the first year.
成功与学习策略:卡萨布兰卡牙科学院学生调查
研究目的本研究旨在评估卡萨布兰卡牙科学院二年级学生使用的学习策略。研究方法:在获得知情同意后,对牙科二年级学生进行了横断面研究。发放了经修改的 WOLF 问卷 "我的智力工具"。该问卷包括 37 个封闭式问题,分别涉及认知、元认知、情感和资源管理四个类别的自我学习实践。社区健康流行病学和生物统计学实验室使用 SPSS 软件进行了数据录入和统计分析。结果86.9%的学生积极参与意义建构、重新表述和举例说明。9.7% 的学生掌握了突出关系和结构。42.8%的学生根据个人标准重新组织信息。在记忆方面,学生使用了两种类型的记忆方法,但以适当的形式为主。在元认知、情感和管理策略方面,21.4%的学生系统地预测了评价情况。在时间管理方面,12.4%的学生定期计划和管理自己的时间。在自信心方面,17.2%的学生表示他们拥有完全的自信心。结论除记忆和理解策略外,所有被评估的工具学生都很少使用和/或没有掌握。为帮助学生掌握这些策略,应更多地使用差异化教学法,如翻转课堂和 MOOCS,以及 OSCE 评估。应举办有关学习策略的讲习班和研讨会,以巩固第一年开设的课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信