LINGUISTIC COMPLEXITY AND SIMPLIFICATION IN TRANSLATION: COGNITIVELY-GROUNDED PHONOLOGICAL METRICS

Q3 Social Sciences
Mariam Almihmadi
{"title":"LINGUISTIC COMPLEXITY AND SIMPLIFICATION IN TRANSLATION: COGNITIVELY-GROUNDED PHONOLOGICAL METRICS","authors":"Mariam Almihmadi","doi":"10.33736/ils.5356.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT   Translated text (TT) is characteristically simpler than non-translated (NTT) authentic text in terms of its lexicon, syntax, and style. It is still not clear what causes this phenomenon, and scholars continue to debate the issue. The traditional lexical metrics that are implemented in the simplification literature are often criticised as unreliable and lacking cognitive grounding. Moreover, being predominantly product-oriented, they cannot tell us how (or why) simplification happens. This paper addresses this limitation in the literature and proposes a paradigm that uses complexity-based measures adopted from Phonology and Cognitive Psychology. Calculations are run on a corpus of 100 translated and non-translated article abstracts drawn from five academic disciplines. Statistical analyses reveal significant differences between TTs and NTTs. The paper discusses the implications of these results and concludes that a cognition-informed approach is a key to demystifying simplification.   Keywords: linguistic complexity; simplification; phonological complexity; neighbourhood density, phonotactic probability","PeriodicalId":36177,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Language Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.5356.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT   Translated text (TT) is characteristically simpler than non-translated (NTT) authentic text in terms of its lexicon, syntax, and style. It is still not clear what causes this phenomenon, and scholars continue to debate the issue. The traditional lexical metrics that are implemented in the simplification literature are often criticised as unreliable and lacking cognitive grounding. Moreover, being predominantly product-oriented, they cannot tell us how (or why) simplification happens. This paper addresses this limitation in the literature and proposes a paradigm that uses complexity-based measures adopted from Phonology and Cognitive Psychology. Calculations are run on a corpus of 100 translated and non-translated article abstracts drawn from five academic disciplines. Statistical analyses reveal significant differences between TTs and NTTs. The paper discusses the implications of these results and concludes that a cognition-informed approach is a key to demystifying simplification.   Keywords: linguistic complexity; simplification; phonological complexity; neighbourhood density, phonotactic probability
翻译中的语言复杂性和简化:基于认知的语音衡量标准
ABSTRACT 翻译文本(TT)与非翻译文本(NTT)相比,在词法、句法和文体方面都具有真实文本简单的特点。目前还不清楚造成这种现象的原因,学者们仍在争论不休。简化文献中采用的传统词法衡量标准常常被批评为不可靠,缺乏认知基础。此外,由于主要以产品为导向,它们无法告诉我们简化是如何(或为什么)发生的。本文针对文献中的这一局限性,提出了一种范式,即采用语音学和认知心理学中基于复杂性的测量方法。本文对来自五个学科的 100 篇翻译和非翻译文章摘要语料进行了计算。统计分析显示,TTs 和 NTTs 之间存在显著差异。本文讨论了这些结果的意义,并得出结论:以认知为基础的方法是揭开简化神秘面纱的关键。 关键词:语言复杂性;简化;语音复杂性;邻域密度;语音战术概率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Issues in Language Studies
Issues in Language Studies Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信