{"title":"Abduction in Animal Minds","authors":"Vera Shumilina","doi":"10.1515/krt-2023-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Following ideas of Ch. S. Peirce on continuity of mind (synechism) and universality of semiotic processes (pansemiotism) as well as development of the understanding of manipulative abduction in works of L. Magnani the thesis of possibility of abductive reasoning in non-human animal minds is defended. The animal capacity to form explanatory hypotheses is demonstrated by instances of grasping regularities in environment, behavior of conspecifics and even self-knowledge. In the framework of debate on instinctual or rather inferential nature of abductive capacity questions of innate and acquired mechanisms of learning, the role of language in development of explanations and priority of inner (emotional) or outer (referential) perspectives in genesis of first explanatory hypotheses are considered.","PeriodicalId":107351,"journal":{"name":"KRITERION – Journal of Philosophy","volume":"44 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KRITERION – Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/krt-2023-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Following ideas of Ch. S. Peirce on continuity of mind (synechism) and universality of semiotic processes (pansemiotism) as well as development of the understanding of manipulative abduction in works of L. Magnani the thesis of possibility of abductive reasoning in non-human animal minds is defended. The animal capacity to form explanatory hypotheses is demonstrated by instances of grasping regularities in environment, behavior of conspecifics and even self-knowledge. In the framework of debate on instinctual or rather inferential nature of abductive capacity questions of innate and acquired mechanisms of learning, the role of language in development of explanations and priority of inner (emotional) or outer (referential) perspectives in genesis of first explanatory hypotheses are considered.
摘要 根据皮尔斯(Ch. S. Peirce)关于心智连续性(synechism)和符号过程普遍性(pansemiotism)的观点,以及马格尼(L. Magnani)作品中对操作性归纳的理解的发展,对非人类动物心智中归纳推理的可能性这一论点进行了辩护。动物形成解释性假设的能力通过掌握环境中的规律性、同类的行为甚至自我认识的实例得到了证明。在辩论归纳能力的本能性质还是推论性质的框架内,考虑了学习的先天机制和后天机制问题、语言在发展解释能力中的作用以及内在(情感)或外在(参照)视角在产生第一个解释性假设中的优先地位。