Inventiveness Aided by Artificial Intelligence and Patent Protection in Polish and European Law. A Comparative Perspective

Michał Szkaradek, Justyna Telenga
{"title":"Inventiveness Aided by Artificial Intelligence and Patent Protection in Polish and European Law. A Comparative Perspective","authors":"Michał Szkaradek, Justyna Telenga","doi":"10.14313/par_250/79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article scrutinises the intricate interplay between artificial intelligence (AI) and patent jurisprudence. According to the authors, while inventions conventionally qualify for patent protection, those predominantly or entirely conceived by AI fall outside the purview of extant Polish and European legislative frameworks. The article delineates the parameters of AI and explicates the criteria for patentability, accentuating that inventions engendered by AI present a conundrum for the prevailing legal paradigms.","PeriodicalId":383231,"journal":{"name":"Pomiary Automatyka Robotyka","volume":"25 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pomiary Automatyka Robotyka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14313/par_250/79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article scrutinises the intricate interplay between artificial intelligence (AI) and patent jurisprudence. According to the authors, while inventions conventionally qualify for patent protection, those predominantly or entirely conceived by AI fall outside the purview of extant Polish and European legislative frameworks. The article delineates the parameters of AI and explicates the criteria for patentability, accentuating that inventions engendered by AI present a conundrum for the prevailing legal paradigms.
人工智能辅助发明与波兰和欧洲法律中的专利保护。比较视角
文章仔细研究了人工智能(AI)与专利判例之间错综复杂的相互作用。作者认为,虽然发明通常有资格获得专利保护,但那些主要或完全由人工智能构思的发明却不在波兰和欧洲现有立法框架的范围之内。文章划定了人工智能的参数并阐述了专利性的标准,强调人工智能所产生的发明给现行法律范式带来了难题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信