Assessment of relationship between different communication methods and treatment compliance in orthodontic patients during Covid-19 pandemics

Hakkı Yılmaz, F. Bilgiç, İlter Burak Köse
{"title":"Assessment of relationship between different communication methods and treatment compliance in orthodontic patients during Covid-19 pandemics","authors":"Hakkı Yılmaz, F. Bilgiç, İlter Burak Köse","doi":"10.17944/interdiscip.1410399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to minimize impairment in oral hygiene and failure of brackets; therefore, effects of pandemic on treatment duration, by communicating our patients using 4 different methods during Covid-19 pandemic. Methods: In the study, 227 patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment were included. Five groups were designed: WhatsApp group, short message service (SMS) group, Teledentistry group, e-mail group and control group. During quarantine period, patients were contacted for 4 times and same text was sent to patients. After pandemics, the patients were assessed using mucogingival index (MGI), orthodontic plaque index (OPI) and failure of brackets was determined. Results: In MGI, percentage of patients with healthy result were as follows: WhatsApp group, 83.7%; SMS group, 87.8%; Teledentistry group, 83.7%; E-mail group, 77.5%; control group, 72.2% and no significant difference was found (p>0.05). The OPI scores were as follows: 1.12±1.24 in WhatsApp group; 1.27±1.28 in SMS group; 1.24±1.38 in Teledentistry group; 1.00±1.22 in E-mail group; and 1.61±1.25 in the control group and no significant difference was found (p>0.05). The mean number of brackets broken was 0.47±0.88 in WhatsApp group, 0.39±0.83 in SMS group, 0.51±1.00 in Teledentistry group, 0.40±0.67 in E-mail group and 0.44±0.86 in the control group and no significant difference was found (p>0.05). Conclusion: It was determined that communicating with patients in different ways did not make any difference in terms of the subjects investigated in the study. It was concluded that it would be more appropriate to conduct new studies including social and psychological evaluations.","PeriodicalId":402691,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Medical Journal","volume":"21 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17944/interdiscip.1410399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to minimize impairment in oral hygiene and failure of brackets; therefore, effects of pandemic on treatment duration, by communicating our patients using 4 different methods during Covid-19 pandemic. Methods: In the study, 227 patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment were included. Five groups were designed: WhatsApp group, short message service (SMS) group, Teledentistry group, e-mail group and control group. During quarantine period, patients were contacted for 4 times and same text was sent to patients. After pandemics, the patients were assessed using mucogingival index (MGI), orthodontic plaque index (OPI) and failure of brackets was determined. Results: In MGI, percentage of patients with healthy result were as follows: WhatsApp group, 83.7%; SMS group, 87.8%; Teledentistry group, 83.7%; E-mail group, 77.5%; control group, 72.2% and no significant difference was found (p>0.05). The OPI scores were as follows: 1.12±1.24 in WhatsApp group; 1.27±1.28 in SMS group; 1.24±1.38 in Teledentistry group; 1.00±1.22 in E-mail group; and 1.61±1.25 in the control group and no significant difference was found (p>0.05). The mean number of brackets broken was 0.47±0.88 in WhatsApp group, 0.39±0.83 in SMS group, 0.51±1.00 in Teledentistry group, 0.40±0.67 in E-mail group and 0.44±0.86 in the control group and no significant difference was found (p>0.05). Conclusion: It was determined that communicating with patients in different ways did not make any difference in terms of the subjects investigated in the study. It was concluded that it would be more appropriate to conduct new studies including social and psychological evaluations.
评估不同沟通方法与 Covid-19 大流行期间正畸患者治疗依从性之间的关系
研究目的本研究的目的是在 Covid-19 大流行期间,通过使用 4 种不同的方法与患者沟通,最大限度地减少口腔卫生的损害和托槽的失效,从而减少大流行对治疗时间的影响。 方法本研究纳入了 227 名接受固定正畸治疗的患者。设计了五个小组:WhatsApp 组、短信服务(SMS)组、远程牙科组、电子邮件组和对照组。在隔离期间,与患者联系 4 次,并向患者发送相同的短信。大流行结束后,使用粘液牙龈指数(MGI)、正畸牙菌斑指数(OPI)对患者进行评估,并确定托槽失败情况。 结果显示在 MGI 中,结果健康的患者比例如下:WhatsApp组,83.7%;短信组,87.8%;远程牙科组,83.7%;电子邮件组,77.5%;对照组,72.2%,无显著差异(P>0.05)。OPI 评分如下WhatsApp 组为 1.12±1.24;短信组为 1.27±1.28;远程牙科组为 1.24±1.38;电子邮件组为 1.00±1.22;对照组为 1.61±1.25,差异无学意义(P>0.05)。WhatsApp组的平均括号破损数为0.47±0.88,SMS组为0.39±0.83,Teledentistry组为0.51±1.00,E-mail组为0.40±0.67,对照组为0.44±0.86,无明显差异(P>0.05)。 结论研究结果表明,就研究对象而言,以不同方式与患者沟通没有任何区别。结论是,开展包括社会和心理评估在内的新研究更为合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信