Academics’ profile and perceived institutional leadership practices in public and private universities

Q4 Multidisciplinary
N. Abdullah, Norazian Mohmad Azman, Erlane K. Ghani, Kamaruzzaman Muhammad, Azleen Ilias, Ismie Roha Mohamed Jais
{"title":"Academics’ profile and perceived institutional leadership practices in public and private universities","authors":"N. Abdullah, Norazian Mohmad Azman, Erlane K. Ghani, Kamaruzzaman Muhammad, Azleen Ilias, Ismie Roha Mohamed Jais","doi":"10.55214/25768484.v7i2.410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyses the profiles of academics and their perceived institutional leadership practices at their universities. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 1771 academics from Malaysian public and private universities. The results of the survey show that women make up the majority of academics in universities, and most of them hold at least a master's degree. The academics at the universities have an average of more than six years of professional experience, and most of them are senior lecturers and associate professors. Many of the professors are or have been in senior positions. The study also shows that the majority of academics believe that the selection of senior staff at their universities is well controlled and that procedures are followed. Their universities also offer a talent pool system for institutional leaders. Academics are selected as institutional leaders on a rotational basis, and their appointment is duly publicized. However, the results of this study show that many universities continue to appoint and nominate future leaders under the old system rather than the new system. The study also shows that academics, whether from public or private universities, have similar views on the procedures of institutional leadership in their respective universities. The academics are generally in favor of the institutional governance approaches at their universities. The results of the study may be valuable in planning talent management for younger members of the academic community, as succession planning requires early intervention rather than identifying key leaders without a focus on talent management.","PeriodicalId":36430,"journal":{"name":"Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology","volume":"231 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v7i2.410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyses the profiles of academics and their perceived institutional leadership practices at their universities. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 1771 academics from Malaysian public and private universities. The results of the survey show that women make up the majority of academics in universities, and most of them hold at least a master's degree. The academics at the universities have an average of more than six years of professional experience, and most of them are senior lecturers and associate professors. Many of the professors are or have been in senior positions. The study also shows that the majority of academics believe that the selection of senior staff at their universities is well controlled and that procedures are followed. Their universities also offer a talent pool system for institutional leaders. Academics are selected as institutional leaders on a rotational basis, and their appointment is duly publicized. However, the results of this study show that many universities continue to appoint and nominate future leaders under the old system rather than the new system. The study also shows that academics, whether from public or private universities, have similar views on the procedures of institutional leadership in their respective universities. The academics are generally in favor of the institutional governance approaches at their universities. The results of the study may be valuable in planning talent management for younger members of the academic community, as succession planning requires early intervention rather than identifying key leaders without a focus on talent management.
公立大学和私立大学的学术概况和机构领导力实践感知
本研究分析了学术界的概况以及他们所认为的大学机构领导力实践。对马来西亚公立和私立大学的 1771 名学者进行了问卷调查。调查结果显示,女性在大学学者中占大多数,她们中的大多数至少拥有硕士学位。这些大学的学者平均拥有六年以上的专业经验,其中大多数是高级讲师和副教授。许多教授现在或曾经担任高级职务。研究还表明,大多数学者认为,他们所在大学的高级职员遴选工作得到了很好的控制,并遵循了相关程序。他们所在的大学还为机构领导提供了一个人才库系统。学术界人士被轮流选拔为机构领导,他们的任命会得到适当公布。然而,本研究的结果表明,许多大学继续按照旧制度而不是新制度任命和提名未来的领导人。研究还显示,无论是来自公立大学还是私立大学的学者,对各自大学的机构领导程序都有类似的看法。学者们普遍赞成各自大学的机构治理方法。研究结果对于规划学术界年轻成员的人才管理可能很有价值,因为继任规划需要及早干预,而不是在不注重人才管理的情况下确定关键领导人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信