Gross-Hessen diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad in the time of archbishop Filofei (Narko), 1946–1949

Aleksandr Kornilov
{"title":"Gross-Hessen diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad in the time of archbishop Filofei (Narko), 1946–1949","authors":"Aleksandr Kornilov","doi":"10.15382/sturii2023115.118-130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article studies the creation and development of the Gross-Hessen Diocese of Vicar of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad (ROCOR) in the years of 1946-1949. It is noted that at the end of the 2nd World War on the territory of Western zones of occupation in Germany, thousands of Orthodox refugees were in need of pastoral and spiritual care and guidance. Synod of ROCOR decided to form a set of vicar’s dioceses, so that in the region of Gross-Hessen, the one was established and was headed by the bishop of the Belarusian Autonomous Orthodox Church by Archbishop Philofei (Narko). Contrary to financial and other social difficulties, the Vicar managed to organize regular liturgical life and largely unite different Orthodox parishes of the Displaced Persons. Some organizational decisions made by Archbishop Philofei are analyzed. In particular, the decision was made to hold regular meetings of the clergy, to form an advisory body under the Vicar Bishop (Vicarian Council in Wiesbaden). The Archbishop organized with success distribution of food assistance to parishes of his diocese in the economically difficult 1949.Based on original documents preserved in the Archives of the German Diocese of the ROCOR, the author provides statistics on the number of parishes, specific names of the clergy who developed parishes in Wiesbaden, where the residence and the Cathedral of Vicar was established, in Darmstadt, Frankfurt, Menhegoff, Furstenwald, Gudensberg and in other places were discovered. The problems that prevented a successful development of the liturgical and out-service life of the Vicar’s diocese are studied, namely: lack of clergy after mass departure of priests and parishioners from Germany to countries of the Western Hemisphere in 1947-1949; conflict over activities of the Orthodox Missionary Group of Hessen-Nassau; problem of the development of Belarusian parishes due to desire of part of the Belarusian political emigration to strengthen the autocephalous movement. Comparative analysis of the activities of the Vicar’s bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church, activities of the North German Bishop Afanasy (Martos) and the Grossen-Hessen’s Archbishop Philofei (Narko) is carried out.","PeriodicalId":407912,"journal":{"name":"St. Tikhons' University Review","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"St. Tikhons' University Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturii2023115.118-130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article studies the creation and development of the Gross-Hessen Diocese of Vicar of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad (ROCOR) in the years of 1946-1949. It is noted that at the end of the 2nd World War on the territory of Western zones of occupation in Germany, thousands of Orthodox refugees were in need of pastoral and spiritual care and guidance. Synod of ROCOR decided to form a set of vicar’s dioceses, so that in the region of Gross-Hessen, the one was established and was headed by the bishop of the Belarusian Autonomous Orthodox Church by Archbishop Philofei (Narko). Contrary to financial and other social difficulties, the Vicar managed to organize regular liturgical life and largely unite different Orthodox parishes of the Displaced Persons. Some organizational decisions made by Archbishop Philofei are analyzed. In particular, the decision was made to hold regular meetings of the clergy, to form an advisory body under the Vicar Bishop (Vicarian Council in Wiesbaden). The Archbishop organized with success distribution of food assistance to parishes of his diocese in the economically difficult 1949.Based on original documents preserved in the Archives of the German Diocese of the ROCOR, the author provides statistics on the number of parishes, specific names of the clergy who developed parishes in Wiesbaden, where the residence and the Cathedral of Vicar was established, in Darmstadt, Frankfurt, Menhegoff, Furstenwald, Gudensberg and in other places were discovered. The problems that prevented a successful development of the liturgical and out-service life of the Vicar’s diocese are studied, namely: lack of clergy after mass departure of priests and parishioners from Germany to countries of the Western Hemisphere in 1947-1949; conflict over activities of the Orthodox Missionary Group of Hessen-Nassau; problem of the development of Belarusian parishes due to desire of part of the Belarusian political emigration to strengthen the autocephalous movement. Comparative analysis of the activities of the Vicar’s bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church, activities of the North German Bishop Afanasy (Martos) and the Grossen-Hessen’s Archbishop Philofei (Narko) is carried out.
1946-1949 年大主教菲洛菲(纳尔科)时期的俄罗斯东正教海外教会格罗斯-黑森教区
文章研究了 1946-1949 年俄罗斯东正教海外教会(ROCOR)格罗斯-黑森教区(Gross-Hessen Diocese of Vicar of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad)的创建和发展。据悉,第二次世界大战结束时,在德国西部占领区的领土上,成千上万的东正教难民需要牧灵关怀和指导。俄罗斯东正教会主教会议决定成立一组牧师教区,因此在格罗斯-黑森地区成立了一个牧师教区,由白俄罗斯自治东正教会主教菲洛菲(纳尔科)领导。尽管面临财政困难和其他社会困难,但主教还是设法组织了正常的礼仪生活,并在很大程度上将流离失所者的不同东正教教区联合起来。本文分析了菲洛菲大主教做出的一些组织决定。特别是,决定定期举行神职人员会议,成立一个隶属于代理主教的咨询机构(威斯巴登代理主教理事会)。在经济困难的 1949 年,大主教成功地组织了向其教区的教区发放食品援助的活动。作者根据保留在罗马天主教会德国教区档案中的原始文件,提供了教区数量的统计数据,并发现了在威斯巴登(在那里建立了主教官邸和主教座堂)、达姆施塔特、法兰克福、门赫戈夫、弗斯滕瓦尔德、古登斯贝格和其他地方发展教区的神职人员的具体姓名。研究了妨碍该督教区成功发展礼仪和外事生活的问题,即:1947-1949 年神父和教区居民大量离开德国前往西半球国家后神职人员的缺乏;黑森-拿骚东正教传教小组活动的冲突;由于部分白俄罗斯政治移民希望加强自治运动而导致的白俄罗斯教区的发展问题。对俄罗斯东正教会的代理主教的活动、北德主教阿法纳西(马托斯)和黑森大主教菲洛菲(纳尔科)的活动进行了比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信