Outcome of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion without Plating

Avin Omar Taher ,, Imad Khaleel ,, Anjam Rawandozy ,, Firas Abdulla
{"title":"Outcome of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion without Plating","authors":"Avin Omar Taher ,, Imad Khaleel ,, Anjam Rawandozy ,, Firas Abdulla","doi":"10.26505/djm.v25i2.1052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedure had traditionally been associated with plating, however,  the increase in cost and complications associated with plating led us to investigate results of multilevel ACDF with polyether ether ketone (PEEK) cages without plating and study complication and fusion rates. Objective: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of patients underwent multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) using polyether ether ketone (PEEK) cage with no plating. Patients and Methods: Sixty patients underwent multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF), Surgical approach, using Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) cages with synthetic bone graft material with no plating. Their mean age was 48 year. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically for a mean time of one year. Assessment done comparing early and late post-operative cervical spinal x-rays for cage subsidence and migration. Improvement in axial neck and radicular pain were assessed using the Visual Analogue Score (VAS). Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), A p value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Sixty patients underwent Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Fusion (ACDF) through Cloward approach.  F:M ratio was 1:1. Two levels were operated in 75% of patients, while in 25% three levels were operated. The majority 85% underwent operation at C5-6 level, least operated levels were C3-C4 and C6-C7 36.7% and 66.7% underwent operation at C4-C5 level. None underwent operation at C2-C3 level. There was significant improvement in axial neck pain with VAS decreasing from 6 to 2, radicular pain improved from 7 to 2. Only one patient (1.7%) showed radiological subsidence of 3 mm after 6 months of operation with no further progression, cage slippage was observed in 2 patients (3.3%) by 1 mm in both cases but no radiological progression. All patients (100%) showed good fusion. Conclusion: Multilevel ACDF with PEEK cages without plating showed to be safe option and provided good fusion rates and clinical outcome in our patients.","PeriodicalId":11202,"journal":{"name":"Diyala Journal of Medicine","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diyala Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26505/djm.v25i2.1052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedure had traditionally been associated with plating, however,  the increase in cost and complications associated with plating led us to investigate results of multilevel ACDF with polyether ether ketone (PEEK) cages without plating and study complication and fusion rates. Objective: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of patients underwent multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) using polyether ether ketone (PEEK) cage with no plating. Patients and Methods: Sixty patients underwent multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF), Surgical approach, using Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) cages with synthetic bone graft material with no plating. Their mean age was 48 year. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically for a mean time of one year. Assessment done comparing early and late post-operative cervical spinal x-rays for cage subsidence and migration. Improvement in axial neck and radicular pain were assessed using the Visual Analogue Score (VAS). Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), A p value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Sixty patients underwent Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Fusion (ACDF) through Cloward approach.  F:M ratio was 1:1. Two levels were operated in 75% of patients, while in 25% three levels were operated. The majority 85% underwent operation at C5-6 level, least operated levels were C3-C4 and C6-C7 36.7% and 66.7% underwent operation at C4-C5 level. None underwent operation at C2-C3 level. There was significant improvement in axial neck pain with VAS decreasing from 6 to 2, radicular pain improved from 7 to 2. Only one patient (1.7%) showed radiological subsidence of 3 mm after 6 months of operation with no further progression, cage slippage was observed in 2 patients (3.3%) by 1 mm in both cases but no radiological progression. All patients (100%) showed good fusion. Conclusion: Multilevel ACDF with PEEK cages without plating showed to be safe option and provided good fusion rates and clinical outcome in our patients.
无钢板多层次颈椎间盘切除前路融合术的疗效
背景:多层次颈椎前路椎间盘切除与融合术(ACDF)传统上与电击有关,然而,电击导致的成本增加和并发症促使我们研究使用聚醚醚酮(PEEK)保持架进行无电击多层次 ACDF 的结果,并研究并发症和融合率。 目的评估使用不带钢板的聚醚醚酮(PEEK)颈椎前路椎间盘切除与融合术(ACDF)的多层次患者的临床和放射学结果。 患者和方法:60名患者接受了多层次前路颈椎椎间盘切除和融合术(ACDF),手术方法是使用聚醚醚酮(PEEK)骨笼和合成植骨材料,不使用钢板。他们的平均年龄为 48 岁。对所有患者进行了平均为期一年的临床和放射学评估。对术后早期和晚期的颈椎 X 光片进行了评估,以了解骨架是否下沉和移位。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估颈部轴向疼痛和根性疼痛的改善情况。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)进行统计分析,P 值≤ 0.05 为具有统计学意义。 结果60名患者通过克洛瓦方法接受了颈椎前路椎间盘切除加融合术(ACDF)。 男女比例为 1:1。75%的患者接受了两级手术,25%的患者接受了三级手术。85%的患者在C5-6水平进行了手术,最少进行手术的水平是C3-C4和C6-C7,分别占36.7%和66.7%。没有人在 C2-C3 水平接受手术。只有一名患者(1.7%)在手术 6 个月后出现了 3 毫米的放射学下沉,但没有进一步发展,有两名患者(3.3%)的骨笼滑动了 1 毫米,但没有放射学发展。所有患者(100%)均显示融合良好。 结论使用 PEEK 保持架的多椎间孔 ACDF(无钢板)是一种安全的选择,能为患者提供良好的融合率和临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信