Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Female Infertility: A Systematic Review

Nur Hayati Jasmin
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Female Infertility: A Systematic Review","authors":"Nur Hayati Jasmin","doi":"10.37231/ajmb.2023.1.s.689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Female infertility can result from issues with the fallopian tubes, uterus, and cervix. Ultrasound has become an essential component of the modern investigation of female infertility and the management of assisted conception, which is able to access endometrial and uterine factors that affect embryo implantation. To date, Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) has become the modality of choice for the initial study of female infertility since it is widely available, cost-effective, and non-invasive. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of TVS in evaluating female infertility and how different types of abnormalities in female infertility affect the diagnostic accuracy. The systematic search in this study followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) and Meta-Analyses. The electronic databases PubMed and ScienceDirect were utilized. Papers published between 2012 and 2022 were chosen and subjected to analysis following the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS). In the initial search strategy, a total of 217 articles were discovered. By applying specific criteria for inclusion and exclusion, a set of five studies involving 770 patients were chosen for analysis. Forest plot analysis of these five studies evaluating sensitivity and specificity demonstrated low heterogeneity (Q = 4.574) and moderate heterogeneity (Q = 20.771) respectively. Employing a random-effects model, transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) demonstrated a favorable overall accuracy for evaluating female infertility with a pooled sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.60, 0.99), and a specificity of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.17). The sensitivity and specificity may vary depending on the specific abnormality being assessed. The most observed abnormalities were endometrial polyps and uterine fibroids, while uterine cancer and adenomyosis were the least frequently observed abnormalities. Findings from this study suggest that TVS offers moderate accuracy in the evaluation of female infertility. TVS is particularly valuable when used in conjunction with hysteroscopy, as it demonstrates high accuracy in detecting and characterizing abnormalities.","PeriodicalId":189900,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Medicine and Biomedicine","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Medicine and Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37231/ajmb.2023.1.s.689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Female infertility can result from issues with the fallopian tubes, uterus, and cervix. Ultrasound has become an essential component of the modern investigation of female infertility and the management of assisted conception, which is able to access endometrial and uterine factors that affect embryo implantation. To date, Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) has become the modality of choice for the initial study of female infertility since it is widely available, cost-effective, and non-invasive. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of TVS in evaluating female infertility and how different types of abnormalities in female infertility affect the diagnostic accuracy. The systematic search in this study followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) and Meta-Analyses. The electronic databases PubMed and ScienceDirect were utilized. Papers published between 2012 and 2022 were chosen and subjected to analysis following the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS). In the initial search strategy, a total of 217 articles were discovered. By applying specific criteria for inclusion and exclusion, a set of five studies involving 770 patients were chosen for analysis. Forest plot analysis of these five studies evaluating sensitivity and specificity demonstrated low heterogeneity (Q = 4.574) and moderate heterogeneity (Q = 20.771) respectively. Employing a random-effects model, transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) demonstrated a favorable overall accuracy for evaluating female infertility with a pooled sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.60, 0.99), and a specificity of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.17). The sensitivity and specificity may vary depending on the specific abnormality being assessed. The most observed abnormalities were endometrial polyps and uterine fibroids, while uterine cancer and adenomyosis were the least frequently observed abnormalities. Findings from this study suggest that TVS offers moderate accuracy in the evaluation of female infertility. TVS is particularly valuable when used in conjunction with hysteroscopy, as it demonstrates high accuracy in detecting and characterizing abnormalities.
经阴道超声在评估女性不孕症中的诊断准确性:系统回顾
女性不孕可能是输卵管、子宫和宫颈出了问题。超声波已成为现代女性不孕症检查和辅助受孕管理的重要组成部分,它能够获取影响胚胎着床的子宫内膜和子宫因素。迄今为止,经阴道超声波(TVS)已成为女性不孕症初步检查的首选方式,因为它应用广泛、成本低、无创伤。本研究旨在评估 TVS 在评估女性不孕症方面的诊断准确性,以及不同类型的女性不孕症异常对诊断准确性的影响。本研究的系统性检索遵循了系统性综述首选报告项目(PRISMA)和元分析(Meta-Analyses)指南。研究使用了电子数据库 PubMed 和 ScienceDirect。选择了 2012 年至 2022 年间发表的论文,并按照诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS)进行了分析。在最初的搜索策略中,共发现了 217 篇文章。通过采用特定的纳入和排除标准,选择了涉及 770 名患者的五项研究进行分析。对这五项研究的敏感性和特异性评估进行森林图分析,结果分别显示出低异质性(Q = 4.574)和中度异质性(Q = 20.771)。采用随机效应模型,经阴道超声(TVS)评估女性不孕症的总体准确性较好,汇总灵敏度为 0.79(95% CI:0.60,0.99),特异性为 0.96(95% CI:0.76,1.17)。灵敏度和特异性可能会因评估的具体异常而有所不同。观察到最多的异常是子宫内膜息肉和子宫肌瘤,而子宫癌和子宫腺肌症是观察到最少的异常。这项研究的结果表明,TVS 在评估女性不孕症方面具有一定的准确性。TVS 在与宫腔镜检查结合使用时尤为重要,因为它在检测和描述异常方面具有很高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书