Jigsaw, Think-Pair-Share and Coop-Coop Cooperative Instructional Strategies and Retention of Students’ Knowledge in Carbohydrate

Comfort Daiko, Emmanuel E. Achor, Gladys U. Jack
{"title":"Jigsaw, Think-Pair-Share and Coop-Coop Cooperative Instructional Strategies and Retention of Students’ Knowledge in Carbohydrate","authors":"Comfort Daiko, Emmanuel E. Achor, Gladys U. Jack","doi":"10.56855/jrsme.v2i3.685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This paper aims to compare the effects of Jigsaw, Think-pair-share, and Coop-Coop Cooperative Instructional Strategies on the retention of students' knowledge in Carbohydrate in Jalingo metropolis, Taraba State, Nigeria. Methodology: The study employed a quasi-experimental non-randomized pre-test, post-test design. The study population comprised 1936 students in all 41 public secondary schools in Jalingo metropolis, Taraba State, Nigeria. The sample consisted of 322 students (males = 184, females = 138) drawn from the population. An Achievement Test in Carbohydrate (ATC), consisting of 50 multiple-choice questions, was used to collect data for the study. The reliability index of the ATC was estimated using Kuder-Richardson (K-20) and yielded a value of .86. Both descriptive statistics, including Mean and standard deviation, and inferential statistics, such as Analysis of Covariance, were adopted for the analysis. Findings: Findings revealed that students taught carbohydrates using Jigsaw retained knowledge more than their counterparts taught using think-pair-share and coop-coop cooperative instructional strategies. Significance: There was no significant difference between the mean retention scores of male and female students taught carbohydrates using Jigsaw, Think-pair-share, and Coop–Coop Cooperative Instructional Strategies. The interaction effects between instructional strategies and gender on retention were not statistically significant. Among other recommendations, it was suggested that there is a need for an urgent workshop to address the use of Jigsaw to teach organic concepts and operations to enable chemistry teachers to deploy it appropriately.","PeriodicalId":201114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Science and Mathematics Education (J-RSME)","volume":"6 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Science and Mathematics Education (J-RSME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56855/jrsme.v2i3.685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to compare the effects of Jigsaw, Think-pair-share, and Coop-Coop Cooperative Instructional Strategies on the retention of students' knowledge in Carbohydrate in Jalingo metropolis, Taraba State, Nigeria. Methodology: The study employed a quasi-experimental non-randomized pre-test, post-test design. The study population comprised 1936 students in all 41 public secondary schools in Jalingo metropolis, Taraba State, Nigeria. The sample consisted of 322 students (males = 184, females = 138) drawn from the population. An Achievement Test in Carbohydrate (ATC), consisting of 50 multiple-choice questions, was used to collect data for the study. The reliability index of the ATC was estimated using Kuder-Richardson (K-20) and yielded a value of .86. Both descriptive statistics, including Mean and standard deviation, and inferential statistics, such as Analysis of Covariance, were adopted for the analysis. Findings: Findings revealed that students taught carbohydrates using Jigsaw retained knowledge more than their counterparts taught using think-pair-share and coop-coop cooperative instructional strategies. Significance: There was no significant difference between the mean retention scores of male and female students taught carbohydrates using Jigsaw, Think-pair-share, and Coop–Coop Cooperative Instructional Strategies. The interaction effects between instructional strategies and gender on retention were not statistically significant. Among other recommendations, it was suggested that there is a need for an urgent workshop to address the use of Jigsaw to teach organic concepts and operations to enable chemistry teachers to deploy it appropriately.
拼图、"思考-对子-分享 "和 "合作-合作 "合作教学策略与学生对碳水化合物知识的保持
目的:本文旨在比较 "拼图"、"思考-对-分享 "和 "合作-合作 "合作教学策略对尼日利亚塔拉巴州贾林戈市学生碳水化合物知识保留的影响。研究方法:本研究采用了前测、后测的非随机准实验设计。研究对象包括尼日利亚塔拉巴州贾林戈市所有 41 所公立中学的 1936 名学生。样本包括从人群中抽取的 322 名学生(男生 184 人,女生 138 人)。研究使用碳水化合物成就测验(ATC)收集数据,该测验由 50 道选择题组成。用 Kuder-Richardson (K-20) 对 ATC 的信度指数进行了估计,结果为 0.86。分析采用了描述性统计(包括平均值和标准差)和推断性统计(如协方差分析)。研究结果研究结果表明,使用拼图教学法教授碳水化合物的学生比使用 "思考-配对-分享 "和 "合作-合作 "合作教学法教授碳水化合物的学生保留的知识更多。显著性:使用拼图、思考-配对-分享和合作-互助合作教学策略教授碳水化合物的男女学生的平均知识保留分数没有明显差异。教学策略和性别对保持率的交互效应在统计学上不显著。除其他建议外,研究人员还建议,有必要紧急举办一个工作坊,探讨如何使用拼图来教授有机概念和操作,以便化学教师能够恰当地使用拼图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信