Comparative Analysis of Optimal Control Strategies: LQR, PID, and Sliding Mode Control for DC Motor Position Performance

Hakan Kızmaz
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Optimal Control Strategies: LQR, PID, and Sliding Mode Control for DC Motor Position Performance","authors":"Hakan Kızmaz","doi":"10.54287/gujsa.1393092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study applies these control methods to the DC motor system to examine the robustness and performance of four optimal control methods. Optimal controllers aim to control the system to minimize a selected performance index. These control methods offer advantages such as improving energy efficiency, reducing costs, and enhancing system security. The Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) based controller is the primary optimal control method. Two well-known traditional control techniques include the Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) and Integral Sliding Mode Controller (ISMC). However, they do not usually contain optimal properties. In this study, the optimal control algorithms, defined by obtaining controller parameters through the Riccati equation, are applied to achieve accurate position-tracking control in a DC motor system using Matlab/Simulink. The integral term-based algorithms seem to be robust and eliminate steady-state errors. The optimal PID controller could not provide the minimum performance index rather than the others. LQR and optimal ISMC algorithms could allow the performance index to be a minimum. An illustrative comparison of the performances of all optimal control algorithms has been presented through graphical representation, along with corresponding interpretations.","PeriodicalId":134301,"journal":{"name":"Gazi University Journal of Science Part A: Engineering and Innovation","volume":"39 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gazi University Journal of Science Part A: Engineering and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54287/gujsa.1393092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study applies these control methods to the DC motor system to examine the robustness and performance of four optimal control methods. Optimal controllers aim to control the system to minimize a selected performance index. These control methods offer advantages such as improving energy efficiency, reducing costs, and enhancing system security. The Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) based controller is the primary optimal control method. Two well-known traditional control techniques include the Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) and Integral Sliding Mode Controller (ISMC). However, they do not usually contain optimal properties. In this study, the optimal control algorithms, defined by obtaining controller parameters through the Riccati equation, are applied to achieve accurate position-tracking control in a DC motor system using Matlab/Simulink. The integral term-based algorithms seem to be robust and eliminate steady-state errors. The optimal PID controller could not provide the minimum performance index rather than the others. LQR and optimal ISMC algorithms could allow the performance index to be a minimum. An illustrative comparison of the performances of all optimal control algorithms has been presented through graphical representation, along with corresponding interpretations.
最佳控制策略的比较分析:直流电机位置性能的 LQR、PID 和滑动模式控制
本研究将这些控制方法应用于直流电机系统,以检验四种最优控制方法的鲁棒性和性能。最优控制器的目的是对系统进行控制,使选定的性能指标最小化。这些控制方法具有提高能效、降低成本和增强系统安全性等优点。基于线性二次调节器(LQR)的控制器是最主要的优化控制方法。两种著名的传统控制技术包括比例积分微分控制器(PID)和积分滑模控制器(ISMC)。然而,它们通常并不包含最优属性。在本研究中,通过里卡提方程获得控制器参数定义的最优控制算法被应用于使用 Matlab/Simulink 实现直流电机系统的精确位置跟踪控制。基于积分项的算法似乎很稳健,能消除稳态误差。与其他算法相比,最优 PID 控制器无法提供最低性能指标。LQR 和最优 ISMC 算法可以使性能指标达到最低。通过图表对所有最优控制算法的性能进行了说明性比较,并给出了相应的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信