Geogrid-Enhanced Modulus and Stress Distribution in Clay Soil

Qiming Chen
{"title":"Geogrid-Enhanced Modulus and Stress Distribution in Clay Soil","authors":"Qiming Chen","doi":"10.3390/geotechnics4010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A series of laboratory and large-scale field model footing tests were conducted to assess the modulus and stress distribution behavior of a clayey soil foundation, both with/without geogrid reinforcement, deviating from the conventional approach of evaluating the strength performance, such as bearing capacity. The modulus was evaluated at three settlement ratios of s/B = 1, 3, and 5%, while the stress distribution angle α was estimated at three applied surface pressures of 234 kPa, 468 kPa, and 936 kPa. The results indicated a stiffer load-settlement response when geogrid reinforcement was included. The modulus of reinforced clayey soil remained nearly constant for test sections with the same reinforced ratio, with the modulus improvement increasing as the reinforced ratio (Rr) increased. The modulus improvement also increased with the settlement ratio (s/B). These results demonstrated that the stress distribution improvement decreased as the surface pressure increased. Generally, both the modulus and stress distribution improvement exhibited an increase with an increase in the tensile modulus of the geogrid. While laboratory model tests consistently provided a higher improvement in the modulus than large-scale field model tests in this study due to a higher reinforced ratio, the stress distribution improvement was similar for both.","PeriodicalId":505610,"journal":{"name":"Geotechnics","volume":"224 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics4010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A series of laboratory and large-scale field model footing tests were conducted to assess the modulus and stress distribution behavior of a clayey soil foundation, both with/without geogrid reinforcement, deviating from the conventional approach of evaluating the strength performance, such as bearing capacity. The modulus was evaluated at three settlement ratios of s/B = 1, 3, and 5%, while the stress distribution angle α was estimated at three applied surface pressures of 234 kPa, 468 kPa, and 936 kPa. The results indicated a stiffer load-settlement response when geogrid reinforcement was included. The modulus of reinforced clayey soil remained nearly constant for test sections with the same reinforced ratio, with the modulus improvement increasing as the reinforced ratio (Rr) increased. The modulus improvement also increased with the settlement ratio (s/B). These results demonstrated that the stress distribution improvement decreased as the surface pressure increased. Generally, both the modulus and stress distribution improvement exhibited an increase with an increase in the tensile modulus of the geogrid. While laboratory model tests consistently provided a higher improvement in the modulus than large-scale field model tests in this study due to a higher reinforced ratio, the stress distribution improvement was similar for both.
粘土中的土工格栅增强模量和应力分布
为了评估粘土地基的模量和应力分布行为,我们进行了一系列实验室和大型现场模型基底试验,包括有土工格栅加固和无土工格栅加固两种情况,偏离了评估承载力等强度性能的传统方法。在 s/B=1、3 和 5% 三个沉降比下对模量进行了评估,在 234 kPa、468 kPa 和 936 kPa 三个施加表面压力下对应力分布角 α 进行了估算。结果表明,加入土工格栅加固后,荷载沉降响应更加坚硬。在具有相同加固比的试验段中,加固粘土的模量几乎保持不变,随着加固比(Rr)的增加,模量的改善幅度也在增加。模量的改善也随着沉降比(s/B)的增加而增加。这些结果表明,应力分布的改善随着表面压力的增加而减小。一般来说,随着土工格栅拉伸模量的增加,模量和应力分布的改善程度都会增加。在本研究中,实验室模型试验的模量改善程度始终高于大型现场模型试验,原因是加固比更高,但两者的应力分布改善程度相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信