Psychosocial Work Conditions and Traffic Safety among Mini and Long Bus Drivers

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
M. Amoadu, E. Ansah, J. Sarfo
{"title":"Psychosocial Work Conditions and Traffic Safety among Mini and Long Bus Drivers","authors":"M. Amoadu, E. Ansah, J. Sarfo","doi":"10.1093/joccuh/uiad019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study examined the association between psychosocial work factors and road traffic crashes (RTC) and tested the differences in psychosocial work factors by mini-bus and long-bus drivers. Methods: This cross-sectional survey employed convenient sampling method to collect data from 7315 long-distance mini and long-bus drivers who operate in Accra and Tema in Ghana cities, to other parts of the country. The bus drivers answered the job content questionnaire, psychosocial safety climate scale (PSC-12), work-family conflict scale and demographic questions on age, education, driving hours and RTC history. Results: The correlational analysis showed a significant association between psychosocial work factors and RTC for the previous two years. Hierarchical multiple linear regression found that supervisor support, skill discretion, decision autonomy, psychological demands, PSC and work-family conflict significantly contributed to explaining RTC among the drivers. Also, significant differences were found between mini-bus and long-bus drivers on driving hours, occurrence of near misses, RTC and all psychosocial work factors explored in this study except work-family conflict. Conclusion: Psychosocial work factors directly predict RTC among mini-bus and long-bus drivers. Policymakers, driver unions, owners and managers of bus transport businesses should prioritise integrating occupational health and safety into road transport activities. Furthermore, managers and bus owners should use bottom-up communication, provide access to support services and work-family balance initiatives, flexible work schedules and a supportive work environment to improve road safety.","PeriodicalId":16632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health","volume":"332 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiad019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the association between psychosocial work factors and road traffic crashes (RTC) and tested the differences in psychosocial work factors by mini-bus and long-bus drivers. Methods: This cross-sectional survey employed convenient sampling method to collect data from 7315 long-distance mini and long-bus drivers who operate in Accra and Tema in Ghana cities, to other parts of the country. The bus drivers answered the job content questionnaire, psychosocial safety climate scale (PSC-12), work-family conflict scale and demographic questions on age, education, driving hours and RTC history. Results: The correlational analysis showed a significant association between psychosocial work factors and RTC for the previous two years. Hierarchical multiple linear regression found that supervisor support, skill discretion, decision autonomy, psychological demands, PSC and work-family conflict significantly contributed to explaining RTC among the drivers. Also, significant differences were found between mini-bus and long-bus drivers on driving hours, occurrence of near misses, RTC and all psychosocial work factors explored in this study except work-family conflict. Conclusion: Psychosocial work factors directly predict RTC among mini-bus and long-bus drivers. Policymakers, driver unions, owners and managers of bus transport businesses should prioritise integrating occupational health and safety into road transport activities. Furthermore, managers and bus owners should use bottom-up communication, provide access to support services and work-family balance initiatives, flexible work schedules and a supportive work environment to improve road safety.
小客车和长途客车司机的社会心理工作条件与交通安全
研究目的本研究探讨了社会心理工作因素与道路交通事故(RTC)之间的关联,并检验了小客车和长途客车司机在社会心理工作因素方面的差异。 研究方法这项横断面调查采用方便抽样法,收集了 7315 名长途小巴和长途大巴司机的数据,这些司机在加纳的阿克拉和特马等城市工作,并前往加纳其他地区。巴士司机回答了工作内容问卷、社会心理安全氛围量表(PSC-12)、工作与家庭冲突量表以及关于年龄、教育程度、驾驶时间和道路交通事故史的人口统计学问题。 结果显示相关分析表明,社会心理学工作因素与前两年的 RTC 之间存在显著关联。层次多元线性回归发现,主管支持、技能自由裁量权、决策自主权、心理需求、PSC 和工作与家庭冲突对解释司机的 RTC 有显著作用。此外,还发现小客车和长途客车司机在驾驶时间、险情发生率、RTC 和本研究探讨的所有社会心理学工作因素(工作-家庭冲突除外)方面存在明显差异。 结论社会心理工作因素可直接预测小客车和长途客车司机的 RTC。政策制定者、司机工会、巴士运输企业的所有者和管理者应优先考虑将职业健康和安全纳入道路运输活动。此外,管理者和巴士车主应采用自下而上的沟通方式,提供支持服务和工作与家庭平衡举措、灵活的工作时间安排和支持性的工作环境,以改善道路安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Health
Journal of Occupational Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal is broad, covering toxicology, ergonomics, psychosocial factors and other relevant health issues of workers, with special emphasis on the current developments in occupational health. The JOH also accepts various methodologies that are relevant to investigation of occupational health risk factors and exposures, such as large-scale epidemiological studies, human studies employing biological techniques and fundamental experiments on animals, and also welcomes submissions concerning occupational health practices and related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信