{"title":"Theology and History: An Outline of Methodological Challenges in Fundamental Theology","authors":"Filip Krazue","doi":"10.18290/rt2023.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article aims to bring together the ambiguities that arise in the course of determining the relationship between theology and the historical sciences. Just as the understanding of the relationship between the natural sciences and theology has developed due to the growth of methodological self-awareness of these disciplines, especially regarding their temporality, a similar progress could be expected in the research on relationship between theology and the historical sciences. It seems that the topic still needs to be synthesized on the ground of fundamental theology. For the theologian, a hermeneutical point of reference on the issue under discussion, can be the ruling of the Second Vatican Council in the 36th paragraph of the Constitution Gaudium et Spes. The temporality of theology features at least three dimensions: God’s Revelation occurrence in time, the occurrence in time of scientific reflection on this Revelation, and the dependence of the understanding and interpretation of both on the data provided by the historical sciences. The solution to the aporias arising in these processes can be the theological study of historiographical doctrines and the historical study of the history of Christianity, self-aware and critical of the historiographical doctrines being accepted.","PeriodicalId":206836,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Teologiczne","volume":"25 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Teologiczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18290/rt2023.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article aims to bring together the ambiguities that arise in the course of determining the relationship between theology and the historical sciences. Just as the understanding of the relationship between the natural sciences and theology has developed due to the growth of methodological self-awareness of these disciplines, especially regarding their temporality, a similar progress could be expected in the research on relationship between theology and the historical sciences. It seems that the topic still needs to be synthesized on the ground of fundamental theology. For the theologian, a hermeneutical point of reference on the issue under discussion, can be the ruling of the Second Vatican Council in the 36th paragraph of the Constitution Gaudium et Spes. The temporality of theology features at least three dimensions: God’s Revelation occurrence in time, the occurrence in time of scientific reflection on this Revelation, and the dependence of the understanding and interpretation of both on the data provided by the historical sciences. The solution to the aporias arising in these processes can be the theological study of historiographical doctrines and the historical study of the history of Christianity, self-aware and critical of the historiographical doctrines being accepted.
本文旨在汇集在确定神学与历史科学之间关系过程中出现的模糊之处。正如对自然科学与神学之间关系的理解因这些学科在方法论上的自我意识(尤其是对其时间性的认识)的增强而得到发展一样,神学与历史科学之间关系的研究也可望取得类似的进展。看来,这一课题仍需在基础神学的基础上加以综合。对于神学家来说,梵蒂冈第二届大公会议在《圣训》(Gaudium et Spes)宪法第 36 段中的裁决可以作为讨论中问题的解释学参照点。神学的时间性至少有三个方面:上帝的启示在时间中发生,对这一启示的科学思考在时间中发生,对这两者的理解和解释都依赖于历史科学提供的数据。要解决这些过程中出现的问题,可以对历史学教义进行神学研究,对基督教历史进行历史研究,对所接受的历史学教义进行自我认识和批判。