The Analysis of Reading Comprehension Question Levels in English Textbook for Vocational High School Based on Revised Bloom's Taxonomy

Intan Kumala Sari, Sahuddin, Yuni Budi Lestari
{"title":"The Analysis of Reading Comprehension Question Levels in English Textbook for Vocational High School Based on Revised Bloom's Taxonomy","authors":"Intan Kumala Sari, Sahuddin, Yuni Budi Lestari","doi":"10.29303/jeef.v3i2.566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading question is one of the tools that can improve students’ critical thinking. In teaching and learning process, providing questions at the HOTS level really helps students to improve their comprehension. This study aims to analyze the category of cognitive levels in reading questions based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in English textbook “forward an English” for 10th Grade Students of Vocational High School. It used descriptive qualitative research. The data of this study was all of reading comprehension questions found in the textbook. Based on the results, researcher found 202 reading comprehension questions in total which is divided into LOTS level that consist of 133 questions or 65.8% and HOTS level that consist of 69 questions or 34.2%. The most dominant category represented in the English textbook was “remembering” level with 78 questions or 38.6% and the lowest category was “applying” level with 4 questions or 2.0 %. In conclusion, the most of the reading comprehension questions in the English textbook “Forward an English” were at the low level of the cognitive domain. Therefore, the teacher must develop more questions in HOTS level so that the students’ need are in accordance with the demands of 2013 curriculum","PeriodicalId":301632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Education Forum (JEEF)","volume":" 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Education Forum (JEEF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/jeef.v3i2.566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reading question is one of the tools that can improve students’ critical thinking. In teaching and learning process, providing questions at the HOTS level really helps students to improve their comprehension. This study aims to analyze the category of cognitive levels in reading questions based on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in English textbook “forward an English” for 10th Grade Students of Vocational High School. It used descriptive qualitative research. The data of this study was all of reading comprehension questions found in the textbook. Based on the results, researcher found 202 reading comprehension questions in total which is divided into LOTS level that consist of 133 questions or 65.8% and HOTS level that consist of 69 questions or 34.2%. The most dominant category represented in the English textbook was “remembering” level with 78 questions or 38.6% and the lowest category was “applying” level with 4 questions or 2.0 %. In conclusion, the most of the reading comprehension questions in the English textbook “Forward an English” were at the low level of the cognitive domain. Therefore, the teacher must develop more questions in HOTS level so that the students’ need are in accordance with the demands of 2013 curriculum
基于修订版布鲁姆分类法的职业高中英语教材阅读理解题层次分析
阅读问题是提高学生批判性思维的工具之一。在教学过程中,提供 HOTS 层次的问题确实有助于提高学生的理解能力。本研究旨在分析职业高中十年级英语教材《forward an English》中基于布鲁姆分类法修订版的阅读问题的认知水平类别。本研究采用描述性定性研究。本研究的数据是教科书中的所有阅读理解问题。根据研究结果,研究人员共发现了 202 道阅读理解题,其中分为 LOTS 级别(133 道题,占 65.8%)和 HOTS 级别(69 道题,占 34.2%)。英语教材中最主要的类别是 "记忆 "级别,共有 78 道题,占 38.6%;最少的类别是 "应用 "级别,共有 4 道题,占 2.0%。总之,英语教材 "Forward an English "中的大多数阅读理解问题都处于认知领域的低水平。因此,教师必须开发更多 HOTS 水平的问题,使学生的需求符合 2013 年课程的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信