Traditional Puppetry, Changing Times: The Ramayana in Indonesian and Malay Puppetry

Kathy Foley
{"title":"Traditional Puppetry, Changing Times: The Ramayana in Indonesian and Malay Puppetry","authors":"Kathy Foley","doi":"10.54103/2724-3346/22209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The story of Rama has been known on Java and mainland Southeast Asia since before the 9th century. The strong divergences in West Java and Malaysian puppet versions from Valmiki show patterns of intensification and localization that make the narrative at home in the region. In the 1960s, the Ramayana was not seen as bearing overt religious or political implications for Muslim performers, and its trans-Southeast Asian popularity boosted its currency. In 1965 the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) held a pan-Southeast Asian Ramayana festival – spurring countries where this epic, preserved in puppetry/mask performance, was only modestly popular (e.g., Indonesia and Philippines) to increase attention to this central narrative for traditional Southeast Asian mainland puppetry. Since the 1990s, however, transnational religio-political forces, including the Hindu revival in India (which sees Rama as proto-ruler of a Hindu realm) and the Islamic revival in the Muslim world (which sees the story as shirk, worshipping a god other than Allah), may problematize the narrative in Indonesian and Malaysian puppetry.","PeriodicalId":237370,"journal":{"name":"AOQU (Achilles Orlando Quixote Ulysses). Rivista di epica","volume":" 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AOQU (Achilles Orlando Quixote Ulysses). Rivista di epica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/2724-3346/22209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The story of Rama has been known on Java and mainland Southeast Asia since before the 9th century. The strong divergences in West Java and Malaysian puppet versions from Valmiki show patterns of intensification and localization that make the narrative at home in the region. In the 1960s, the Ramayana was not seen as bearing overt religious or political implications for Muslim performers, and its trans-Southeast Asian popularity boosted its currency. In 1965 the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) held a pan-Southeast Asian Ramayana festival – spurring countries where this epic, preserved in puppetry/mask performance, was only modestly popular (e.g., Indonesia and Philippines) to increase attention to this central narrative for traditional Southeast Asian mainland puppetry. Since the 1990s, however, transnational religio-political forces, including the Hindu revival in India (which sees Rama as proto-ruler of a Hindu realm) and the Islamic revival in the Muslim world (which sees the story as shirk, worshipping a god other than Allah), may problematize the narrative in Indonesian and Malaysian puppetry.
传统木偶戏,时代变迁:印尼和马来木偶戏中的罗摩衍那
早在 9 世纪之前,爪哇和东南亚大陆就已流传着罗摩的故事。西爪哇和马来西亚的木偶版本与瓦尔米基版本存在很大差异,这表明该故事的强化和本地化模式使其在该地区如鱼得水。20 世纪 60 年代,穆斯林表演者认为《罗摩衍那》并不具有明显的宗教或政治含义,而它在东南亚地区的流行则促进了它的传播。1965 年,东南亚国家联盟(ASEAN)举办了泛东南亚《罗摩衍那》节--这促使以木偶/面具表演形式保存这部史诗的国家(如印度尼西亚和菲律宾)提高了对这部传统东南亚大陆木偶戏核心叙事的关注。然而,自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,跨国宗教政治力量,包括印度的印度教复兴(认为罗摩是印度教王国的原统治者)和穆斯林世界的伊斯兰教复兴(认为该故事是邪教,崇拜安拉以外的神),可能会使印尼和马来西亚木偶戏中的叙事出现问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信