Outcome of Optical Keratoplasty for Corneal Scar due to Infective Keratitis

IF 0.3 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
L. Bajracharya
{"title":"Outcome of Optical Keratoplasty for Corneal Scar due to Infective Keratitis","authors":"L. Bajracharya","doi":"10.3126/nepjoph.v15i1.40632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Corneal opacity is an important cause of blindness in developing countries. Objectives: This study analyzes optical keratoplasty performed for corneal opacity due to infective keratitis. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of all consecutive cases of optical keratoplasty performed between 2011 and 2014 (four-year period) for healed infective keratitis. Cases with less than two months’ followup were excluded during outcome evaluation. Comparison was made between keratoplasty for Microbial and Viral (herpetic) Scar. Results: Ninety-three eyes of 93 patients were enrolled. Fifty-nine (63.4%) were male. Average age of patients was 38.9±19.5 years. Average donor endothelial cell count was 2713±434.5 cells/mm2. Fifty-four (58%) corneal scars were due to microbial keratitis and others were herpetic. Eighty-five (91.4%) had undergone penetrating keratoplasty. Eighty-eight (94.6%) cases were included for outcome analysis. Average follow-up duration was 37±27.5 months. Fifty-two (59%) had clear graft at their last visit. Twenty-three (26.1%) grafts had endothelial failure and 13 (14.7%) grafts failed due to late onset keratitis. Twenty-five (28.4%) had vision of ≥6/18. Rejection occurred in 24(27.2%) and glaucoma in 11(12.5%). Post-operatively viral keratitis in the graft occurred significantly more inViral Scar Group (38.6%, n=15) than in Microbial Scar Group (5.5%, n=3). But there was no significant difference in graft clarity, rejection, vision and secondary glaucoma between the two Groups. Conclusion: Outcome of keratoplasty for post-infectious scars was found fairly satisfactory. Although occurrence of viral keratitis was higher in case of keratoplasty done for Viral Scars, the final result was similar to that of microbial scar.","PeriodicalId":44759,"journal":{"name":"Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nepjoph.v15i1.40632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Corneal opacity is an important cause of blindness in developing countries. Objectives: This study analyzes optical keratoplasty performed for corneal opacity due to infective keratitis. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of all consecutive cases of optical keratoplasty performed between 2011 and 2014 (four-year period) for healed infective keratitis. Cases with less than two months’ followup were excluded during outcome evaluation. Comparison was made between keratoplasty for Microbial and Viral (herpetic) Scar. Results: Ninety-three eyes of 93 patients were enrolled. Fifty-nine (63.4%) were male. Average age of patients was 38.9±19.5 years. Average donor endothelial cell count was 2713±434.5 cells/mm2. Fifty-four (58%) corneal scars were due to microbial keratitis and others were herpetic. Eighty-five (91.4%) had undergone penetrating keratoplasty. Eighty-eight (94.6%) cases were included for outcome analysis. Average follow-up duration was 37±27.5 months. Fifty-two (59%) had clear graft at their last visit. Twenty-three (26.1%) grafts had endothelial failure and 13 (14.7%) grafts failed due to late onset keratitis. Twenty-five (28.4%) had vision of ≥6/18. Rejection occurred in 24(27.2%) and glaucoma in 11(12.5%). Post-operatively viral keratitis in the graft occurred significantly more inViral Scar Group (38.6%, n=15) than in Microbial Scar Group (5.5%, n=3). But there was no significant difference in graft clarity, rejection, vision and secondary glaucoma between the two Groups. Conclusion: Outcome of keratoplasty for post-infectious scars was found fairly satisfactory. Although occurrence of viral keratitis was higher in case of keratoplasty done for Viral Scars, the final result was similar to that of microbial scar.
光学角膜移植术治疗感染性角膜炎引起的角膜瘢痕的效果
导言:角膜混浊是发展中国家失明的一个重要原因。研究目的本研究分析了因感染性角膜炎导致角膜混浊而实施的光学角膜移植术。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是 2011 年至 2014 年(四年期间)因感染性角膜炎痊愈而实施光学角膜移植术的所有连续病例。结果评估时排除了随访不足两个月的病例。对微生物性和病毒性(疱疹病毒)疤痕的角膜移植手术进行了比较。结果共有 93 名患者的 93 只眼睛接受了角膜移植手术。其中 59 名(63.4%)为男性。患者平均年龄为(38.9±19.5)岁。平均供体内皮细胞数为(2713±434.5)个/平方毫米。54例(58%)角膜疤痕由微生物性角膜炎引起,其他为疱疹性角膜炎。85人(91.4%)接受过穿透性角膜移植术。88例(94.6%)病例被纳入结果分析。平均随访时间为 37±27.5 个月。52例(59%)患者在最后一次就诊时移植物清晰。23例(26.1%)移植物内皮失败,13例(14.7%)移植物因晚期角膜炎而失败。25例(28.4%)患者的视力≥6/18。24例(27.2%)发生了排斥反应,11例(12.5%)发生了青光眼。术后病毒性角膜炎在病毒性瘢痕组(38.6%,n=15)的发生率明显高于微生物性瘢痕组(5.5%,n=3)。但两组在移植物清晰度、排斥反应、视力和继发性青光眼方面没有明显差异。结论感染后疤痕的角膜移植手术效果相当令人满意。虽然病毒性疤痕角膜移植术中病毒性角膜炎的发生率较高,但最终结果与微生物性疤痕相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信