Another face of interaction: communication collectives from peripheries and the State

Mariana Fonseca, Debora Rezende de Almeida
{"title":"Another face of interaction: communication collectives from peripheries and the State","authors":"Mariana Fonseca, Debora Rezende de Almeida","doi":"10.1590/2236-9996.2024-5911.e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article sheds light on forms of collective action in urban peripheries that are rarely addressed in studies on participation in Brazil: the communication collectives. It proposes a history – and process based interpretation to understand who these actors are and why they criticize the interaction with the State. The research is based on content analysis and on an exhaustive thematic characterization of 14,315 posts on Twitter and Facebook pages of 8 collectives from four Brazilian regions, during the Covid-19 pandemic, collected from the social media platforms' APIs. The findings reveal the actors' perception that peripheries have long operated on the basis of \"we for us\" and disclose the differential and sometimes violent face of the State's interaction with peripheries.","PeriodicalId":336116,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos Metrópole","volume":"21 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos Metrópole","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-9996.2024-5911.e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article sheds light on forms of collective action in urban peripheries that are rarely addressed in studies on participation in Brazil: the communication collectives. It proposes a history – and process based interpretation to understand who these actors are and why they criticize the interaction with the State. The research is based on content analysis and on an exhaustive thematic characterization of 14,315 posts on Twitter and Facebook pages of 8 collectives from four Brazilian regions, during the Covid-19 pandemic, collected from the social media platforms' APIs. The findings reveal the actors' perception that peripheries have long operated on the basis of "we for us" and disclose the differential and sometimes violent face of the State's interaction with peripheries.
互动的另一面:来自边缘地区的传播集体与国家
摘要 本文揭示了在巴西有关参与的研究中很少涉及的城市边缘地区的集体行动形式:传播集体。文章提出了一种基于历史和过程的解释,以了解这些行动者是谁以及他们为什么批评与国家的互动。研究基于内容分析和详尽的主题分析,从社交媒体平台的应用程序接口(APIs)中收集了巴西四个地区 8 个集体在 Twitter 和 Facebook 页面上发布的 14,315 条帖子。研究结果表明,行动者认为外围地区长期以来是在 "我们为我们 "的基础上运作的,并揭示了国家与外围地区互动的不同面貌,有时甚至是暴力面貌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信