Natthawadee Laokulrath, Mihir Ananta Gudi, Rahul Deb, Ian O Ellis, Puay Hoon Tan
{"title":"Invasive breast cancer reporting guidelines: ICCR, CAP, RCPath, RCPA datasets and future directions","authors":"Natthawadee Laokulrath, Mihir Ananta Gudi, Rahul Deb, Ian O Ellis, Puay Hoon Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.mpdhp.2023.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pathological characteristics are essential for breast cancer staging and treatment; hence, regional and country-based pathology reporting protocols have been produced to facilitate comprehensive reporting by pathologists<span>. However, these guidelines can vary in reporting variables, terminology definition, methods of measurement/scoring, which may lead to discordant information for clinicians and disagreement among pathologists. To obviate this, the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) has recently produced datasets for histological reporting of breast cancer to unify the reporting elements, facilitating international comparability. In this review, we focus on the invasive breast carcinoma reporting datasets with the aim of providing an overview of ICCR recommendations in comparison with those published by regional professional organizations (the Royal College of Pathologists of the United Kingdom (UK) (RCPath), the United States (US) College of American Pathologists (CAP), the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA)), including relevant evidence with practical tips on accurate reporting of breast cancer resection specimens. In addition, we discuss some divergent aspects and suggest future directions for a unified breast cancer pathology reporting framework.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":39961,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Histopathology","volume":"30 2","pages":"Pages 87-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756231723001822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pathological characteristics are essential for breast cancer staging and treatment; hence, regional and country-based pathology reporting protocols have been produced to facilitate comprehensive reporting by pathologists. However, these guidelines can vary in reporting variables, terminology definition, methods of measurement/scoring, which may lead to discordant information for clinicians and disagreement among pathologists. To obviate this, the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) has recently produced datasets for histological reporting of breast cancer to unify the reporting elements, facilitating international comparability. In this review, we focus on the invasive breast carcinoma reporting datasets with the aim of providing an overview of ICCR recommendations in comparison with those published by regional professional organizations (the Royal College of Pathologists of the United Kingdom (UK) (RCPath), the United States (US) College of American Pathologists (CAP), the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA)), including relevant evidence with practical tips on accurate reporting of breast cancer resection specimens. In addition, we discuss some divergent aspects and suggest future directions for a unified breast cancer pathology reporting framework.
期刊介绍:
This monthly review journal aims to provide the practising diagnostic pathologist and trainee pathologist with up-to-date reviews on histopathology and cytology and related technical advances. Each issue contains invited articles on a variety of topics from experts in the field and includes a mini-symposium exploring one subject in greater depth. Articles consist of system-based, disease-based reviews and advances in technology. They update the readers on day-to-day diagnostic work and keep them informed of important new developments. An additional feature is the short section devoted to hypotheses; these have been refereed. There is also a correspondence section.