Multisite clinical cross-validation and variant interpretation of a next generation sequencing panel for lymphoid cancer prognostication.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Peter J B Sabatini, Josh Bridgers, Shujun Huang, Gregory Downs, Tong Zhang, Clare Sheen, Nicole Park, Robert Kridel, Marco A Marra, Christian Steidl, David W Scott, Aly Karsan
{"title":"Multisite clinical cross-validation and variant interpretation of a next generation sequencing panel for lymphoid cancer prognostication.","authors":"Peter J B Sabatini, Josh Bridgers, Shujun Huang, Gregory Downs, Tong Zhang, Clare Sheen, Nicole Park, Robert Kridel, Marco A Marra, Christian Steidl, David W Scott, Aly Karsan","doi":"10.1136/jcp-2023-209262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Genomic sequencing of lymphomas is under-represented in routine clinical testing despite having prognostic and predictive value. Clinical implementation is challenging due to a lack of consensus on reportable targets and a paucity of reference samples. We organised a cross-validation study of a lymphoma-tailored next-generation sequencing panel between two College of American Pathologists (CAP)-accredited clinical laboratories to mitigate these challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consensus for the genomic targets was discussed between the two institutes based on recurrence in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and T-cell lymphomas. Using the same genomic targets, each laboratory ordered libraries independently and a cross-validation study was designed to exchange samples (8 cell lines and 22 clinical samples) and their FASTQ files.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity of the panel when comparing different library preparation and bioinformatic workflows was between 97% and 99% and specificity was 100% when a 5% limit of detection cut-off was applied. To evaluate how the current standards for variant classification of tumours apply to lymphomas, the Association for Molecular Pathology/American Society of Clinical Oncology/CAP and OncoKB classification systems were applied to the panel. The majority of variants were assigned a possibly actionable class or likely pathogenic due to more limited evidence in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The cross-validation study highlights the benefits of sample and data exchange for clinical validation and provided a framework for reporting the findings in lymphoid malignancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"187-194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2023-209262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Genomic sequencing of lymphomas is under-represented in routine clinical testing despite having prognostic and predictive value. Clinical implementation is challenging due to a lack of consensus on reportable targets and a paucity of reference samples. We organised a cross-validation study of a lymphoma-tailored next-generation sequencing panel between two College of American Pathologists (CAP)-accredited clinical laboratories to mitigate these challenges.

Methods: A consensus for the genomic targets was discussed between the two institutes based on recurrence in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and T-cell lymphomas. Using the same genomic targets, each laboratory ordered libraries independently and a cross-validation study was designed to exchange samples (8 cell lines and 22 clinical samples) and their FASTQ files.

Results: The sensitivity of the panel when comparing different library preparation and bioinformatic workflows was between 97% and 99% and specificity was 100% when a 5% limit of detection cut-off was applied. To evaluate how the current standards for variant classification of tumours apply to lymphomas, the Association for Molecular Pathology/American Society of Clinical Oncology/CAP and OncoKB classification systems were applied to the panel. The majority of variants were assigned a possibly actionable class or likely pathogenic due to more limited evidence in the literature.

Conclusions: The cross-validation study highlights the benefits of sample and data exchange for clinical validation and provided a framework for reporting the findings in lymphoid malignancies.

用于淋巴癌预后的新一代测序面板的多点临床交叉验证和变异解释。
目的:淋巴瘤基因组测序尽管具有预后和预测价值,但在常规临床检测中的比例却很低。由于对可报告的靶点缺乏共识以及参考样本匮乏,临床实施具有挑战性。我们在两家美国病理学家学会(CAP)认可的临床实验室之间组织了一项淋巴瘤定制下一代测序面板的交叉验证研究,以减轻这些挑战:方法:两家机构根据弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤、滤泡淋巴瘤、套细胞淋巴瘤、慢性淋巴细胞白血病和T细胞淋巴瘤的复发情况,就基因组靶点达成共识。使用相同的基因组目标,每个实验室独立订购文库,并设计了一项交叉验证研究,交换样本(8 个细胞系和 22 个临床样本)及其 FASTQ 文件:结果:在比较不同的文库制备和生物信息学工作流程时,面板的灵敏度在 97% 到 99% 之间,而在应用 5% 的检测限时,特异性为 100%。为了评估目前的肿瘤变异分类标准如何适用于淋巴瘤,分子病理学协会/美国临床肿瘤学会/CAP和OncoKB分类系统被应用于该小组。由于文献中的证据较为有限,大多数变异被归为可能可操作类或可能致病类:交叉验证研究强调了样本和数据交换对临床验证的益处,并为报告淋巴恶性肿瘤的研究结果提供了一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
113
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Pathology is a leading international journal covering all aspects of pathology. Diagnostic and research areas covered include histopathology, virology, haematology, microbiology, cytopathology, chemical pathology, molecular pathology, forensic pathology, dermatopathology, neuropathology and immunopathology. Each issue contains Reviews, Original articles, Short reports, Correspondence and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信