Bioleaching of a lateritic ore (Piauí, Brazil) in percolators

IF 4.8 2区 材料科学 Q1 METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING
Srdjan Stanković, Simon Goldmann, Dennis Kraemer, Kristian Ufer, Axel Schippers
{"title":"Bioleaching of a lateritic ore (Piauí, Brazil) in percolators","authors":"Srdjan Stanković,&nbsp;Simon Goldmann,&nbsp;Dennis Kraemer,&nbsp;Kristian Ufer,&nbsp;Axel Schippers","doi":"10.1016/j.hydromet.2024.106262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Heap leaching of laterites for extraction of nickel and cobalt is an attractive alternative to capital and energy intensive high pressure acid leaching, the dominant hydrometallurgical processing technology for limonitic laterites. Conventional approach for heap leaching of laterites is leaching with sulfuric acid. Consumption of sulfuric acid during heap leaching is substantial and industrial-scale operations require construction of a sulfuric acid production plant on site. In this study, heap bioleaching of laterites was simulated in laboratory scale column percolators and bioleaching of nickel and cobalt from lateritic material was successfully demonstrated for the first time. The process is based on biooxidation of the bacterially modified “wet sulfur” inside column percolators by sulfur-oxidizing acidophilic bacteria <em>Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans.</em> The “wet sulfur“ was generated in a bioreactor with the bacterial culture, harvested, and mixed with lateritic ore before forming agglomerates to be filled in the percolator columns. Liquid was circulated with a flow rate of 8 mL/min. Maximum metal extraction was 66% nickel, 95% cobalt, 10% iron, 55% magnesium and 89% manganese from the Piauí lateritic ore after one month bioleaching. For comparison, chemical leaching with 1 M sulfuric acid with or without addition of 10 g/L of ferrous sulfate heptahydrate as reductant resulted in extraction of approximately 80% nickel, 86% cobalt, 33% iron, 50% magnesium and 81% manganese. With bioleaching a higher cobalt but lower nickel and iron extraction was achieved, i.e. a better selectivity of nickel over iron extraction, as well as a relatively higher pH of the pregnant leach solution requiring less limestone and, consequently, lower CO<sub>2</sub> emission and generation of iron cake waste in case of laterite bioleaching. Overall, the results are promising and show potential of laterite heap bioleaching to be further developed to application on industrial scale.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13193,"journal":{"name":"Hydrometallurgy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304386X24000021/pdfft?md5=4c6c586075846bb71da5040c9b8d7669&pid=1-s2.0-S0304386X24000021-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrometallurgy","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304386X24000021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heap leaching of laterites for extraction of nickel and cobalt is an attractive alternative to capital and energy intensive high pressure acid leaching, the dominant hydrometallurgical processing technology for limonitic laterites. Conventional approach for heap leaching of laterites is leaching with sulfuric acid. Consumption of sulfuric acid during heap leaching is substantial and industrial-scale operations require construction of a sulfuric acid production plant on site. In this study, heap bioleaching of laterites was simulated in laboratory scale column percolators and bioleaching of nickel and cobalt from lateritic material was successfully demonstrated for the first time. The process is based on biooxidation of the bacterially modified “wet sulfur” inside column percolators by sulfur-oxidizing acidophilic bacteria Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. The “wet sulfur“ was generated in a bioreactor with the bacterial culture, harvested, and mixed with lateritic ore before forming agglomerates to be filled in the percolator columns. Liquid was circulated with a flow rate of 8 mL/min. Maximum metal extraction was 66% nickel, 95% cobalt, 10% iron, 55% magnesium and 89% manganese from the Piauí lateritic ore after one month bioleaching. For comparison, chemical leaching with 1 M sulfuric acid with or without addition of 10 g/L of ferrous sulfate heptahydrate as reductant resulted in extraction of approximately 80% nickel, 86% cobalt, 33% iron, 50% magnesium and 81% manganese. With bioleaching a higher cobalt but lower nickel and iron extraction was achieved, i.e. a better selectivity of nickel over iron extraction, as well as a relatively higher pH of the pregnant leach solution requiring less limestone and, consequently, lower CO2 emission and generation of iron cake waste in case of laterite bioleaching. Overall, the results are promising and show potential of laterite heap bioleaching to be further developed to application on industrial scale.

红土矿(巴西皮奥伊)在渗滤器中的生物渗滤
红土堆浸法提取镍和钴是资本和能源密集型高压酸浸法的一种有吸引力的替代方法,高压酸浸法是褐铁矿红土的主要湿法冶金加工技术。红土堆浸的传统方法是用硫酸浸出。堆浸过程中硫酸的消耗量很大,工业规模的操作需要在现场建造硫酸生产厂。本研究在实验室规模的渗滤柱中模拟了红土堆生物沥滤,并首次成功演示了红土材料中镍和钴的生物沥滤。该工艺是通过嗜硫氧化嗜酸性细菌 Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans 对渗滤器内经细菌改良的 "湿硫 "进行生物氧化。湿硫 "在生物反应器中与细菌培养物一起生成,收获后与红土矿石混合,然后形成团块填入渗滤塔。液体以 8 mL/min 的流速循环。经过一个月的生物浸出后,皮奥伊红土矿石中的镍萃取率达到 66%,钴萃取率达到 95%,铁萃取率达到 10%,镁萃取率达到 55%,锰萃取率达到 89%。相比之下,使用 1 M 硫酸进行化学浸出,并添加或不添加 10 g/L 七水硫酸亚铁作为还原剂,可提取约 80% 的镍、86% 的钴、33% 的铁、50% 的镁和 81% 的锰。通过生物浸出,钴的萃取率较高,但镍和铁的萃取率较低,即镍的选择性高于铁的萃取率,同时孕浸溶液的 pH 值相对较高,所需的石灰石较少,因此,在红土生物浸出的情况下,二氧化碳排放量和铁饼废料的产生量较低。总之,研究结果很有前景,表明红土堆生物沥滤法具有进一步开发并应用于工业规模的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrometallurgy
Hydrometallurgy 工程技术-冶金工程
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
6.40%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Hydrometallurgy aims to compile studies on novel processes, process design, chemistry, modelling, control, economics and interfaces between unit operations, and to provide a forum for discussions on case histories and operational difficulties. Topics covered include: leaching of metal values by chemical reagents or bacterial action at ambient or elevated pressures and temperatures; separation of solids from leach liquors; removal of impurities and recovery of metal values by precipitation, ion exchange, solvent extraction, gaseous reduction, cementation, electro-winning and electro-refining; pre-treatment of ores by roasting or chemical treatments such as halogenation or reduction; recycling of reagents and treatment of effluents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信