Regulation of open straw burning and residential coal burning around urbanized areas could achieve urban air quality standards in the cold region of northeastern China

Luyan He , Lingjian Duanmu , Xuewei Chen , Bo You , Gang Liu , Xin Wen , Li Guo , Qiuyang Bao , Jing Fu , Weiwei Chen
{"title":"Regulation of open straw burning and residential coal burning around urbanized areas could achieve urban air quality standards in the cold region of northeastern China","authors":"Luyan He ,&nbsp;Lingjian Duanmu ,&nbsp;Xuewei Chen ,&nbsp;Bo You ,&nbsp;Gang Liu ,&nbsp;Xin Wen ,&nbsp;Li Guo ,&nbsp;Qiuyang Bao ,&nbsp;Jing Fu ,&nbsp;Weiwei Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.horiz.2023.100077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Air quality issues in Northeast China are concerning due to the significant seasonal atmospheric pollution and typical climatic, geographic and industrial structure characteristics of the area. However, urban air quality managers are having great difficulty achieving targeted pollution control goals in the time allotted due to limited studies in the region. In this study, using the city of Siping in Jilin Province as a case study, we analysed the cause of seasonal atmospheric pollution, developed a high-resolution emissions inventory for major atmospheric pollutants and simulated urban air quality improvements under projected emission control scenarios to select a reasonable source control scheme to inform urban air quality management planning in the region. Years with available air quality data (2014–2020) were divided into three periods, i.e., a weak control period (WCP: 2014–2017), an enhanced control period (ECP: 2018–2019) and the COVID-19 period (CDP: 2020). The annual PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub> and NOx emissions varied by 62∼46 μg·m<sup>−3</sup>, 103∼76 μg·m<sup>−3</sup>, 27∼22 μg·m<sup>−3</sup> and 46∼41 μg·m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively, during the WCP; the emissions decreased to 37 μg·m<sup>−3</sup>, 69 μg·m<sup>−3</sup>, 11 μg·m<sup>−3</sup> and 34 μg·m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively, during the ECP and to 33 μg·m<sup>−3</sup>, 61 μg·m<sup>−3</sup>, 11 μg·m<sup>−3</sup> and 33 μg·m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively, during the CDP, which reached the limits of the Ambient Air Quality Standard of China (level II, 35 μg·m<sup>−3</sup>, 70 μg·m<sup>−3</sup>, 60 μg·m<sup>−3</sup> and 50 μg·m<sup>−3</sup>). The PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> indices exceeded the standards, mainly in late autumn (October and November) and in the middle of winter (January and February). Based on comprehensive data analysis of the spatiotemporal air quality and the local high-resolution emissions inventory, straw burning, stationary combustion (especially for coal burning) and vehicle emissions were the main pollution sources in late autumn, and continuous adverse weather conditions were the dominant factors in severe pollution days during the middle of winter. In addition, the urban air quality of Siping was also affected by pollutant transport from the northwest (the city of Songyuan in Jilin Province), northeast (the city of Changchun in Jilin Province) and south (the city of Tieling in Liaoning Province) according the Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model. Strict straw-burning policy was implemented in autumn during the ECP and CDP, which significantly improved the air quality from that of the WCP, with an AQI reduction of 31.58 %. However, the planned burning policy was not well-implemented, resulting in more days of moderate or heavy pollution. Using 2017 as the base year, scenarios were simulated in which feasible source control measures were set (namely, straw-burning control, the elimination of small boilers in urbanized areas, staggered peak heating measures and a 50 % reduction in residential bulk coal burning around urbanized areas and suburban areas), and the concentrations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> were projected to decline by more than 29.79 %, meeting the urban air quality standards. This study highlights the importance of combining straw burning regulation in no-burning areas, limited burning areas and residential coal-burning substitution around urbanized areas to improving the air quality in cold regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101199,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Horizons","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100077"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772737823000317/pdfft?md5=acf349517ae7fad0d29ea111268d402f&pid=1-s2.0-S2772737823000317-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772737823000317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Air quality issues in Northeast China are concerning due to the significant seasonal atmospheric pollution and typical climatic, geographic and industrial structure characteristics of the area. However, urban air quality managers are having great difficulty achieving targeted pollution control goals in the time allotted due to limited studies in the region. In this study, using the city of Siping in Jilin Province as a case study, we analysed the cause of seasonal atmospheric pollution, developed a high-resolution emissions inventory for major atmospheric pollutants and simulated urban air quality improvements under projected emission control scenarios to select a reasonable source control scheme to inform urban air quality management planning in the region. Years with available air quality data (2014–2020) were divided into three periods, i.e., a weak control period (WCP: 2014–2017), an enhanced control period (ECP: 2018–2019) and the COVID-19 period (CDP: 2020). The annual PM2.5, PM10, SO2 and NOx emissions varied by 62∼46 μg·m−3, 103∼76 μg·m−3, 27∼22 μg·m−3 and 46∼41 μg·m−3, respectively, during the WCP; the emissions decreased to 37 μg·m−3, 69 μg·m−3, 11 μg·m−3 and 34 μg·m−3, respectively, during the ECP and to 33 μg·m−3, 61 μg·m−3, 11 μg·m−3 and 33 μg·m−3, respectively, during the CDP, which reached the limits of the Ambient Air Quality Standard of China (level II, 35 μg·m−3, 70 μg·m−3, 60 μg·m−3 and 50 μg·m−3). The PM2.5 and PM10 indices exceeded the standards, mainly in late autumn (October and November) and in the middle of winter (January and February). Based on comprehensive data analysis of the spatiotemporal air quality and the local high-resolution emissions inventory, straw burning, stationary combustion (especially for coal burning) and vehicle emissions were the main pollution sources in late autumn, and continuous adverse weather conditions were the dominant factors in severe pollution days during the middle of winter. In addition, the urban air quality of Siping was also affected by pollutant transport from the northwest (the city of Songyuan in Jilin Province), northeast (the city of Changchun in Jilin Province) and south (the city of Tieling in Liaoning Province) according the Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model. Strict straw-burning policy was implemented in autumn during the ECP and CDP, which significantly improved the air quality from that of the WCP, with an AQI reduction of 31.58 %. However, the planned burning policy was not well-implemented, resulting in more days of moderate or heavy pollution. Using 2017 as the base year, scenarios were simulated in which feasible source control measures were set (namely, straw-burning control, the elimination of small boilers in urbanized areas, staggered peak heating measures and a 50 % reduction in residential bulk coal burning around urbanized areas and suburban areas), and the concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 were projected to decline by more than 29.79 %, meeting the urban air quality standards. This study highlights the importance of combining straw burning regulation in no-burning areas, limited burning areas and residential coal-burning substitution around urbanized areas to improving the air quality in cold regions.

Abstract Image

城市化地区周边露天秸秆焚烧和居民燃煤监管可实现中国东北寒冷地区城市空气质量达标
由于东北地区季节性大气污染严重,且具有典型的气候、地理和产业结构特点,该地区的空气质量问题令人担忧。然而,由于对该地区的研究有限,城市空气质量管理者很难在规定时间内实现预定的污染控制目标。在本研究中,我们以吉林省四平市为例,分析了季节性大气污染的成因,编制了高分辨率的主要大气污染物排放清单,并模拟了预测排放控制情景下的城市空气质量改善情况,以选择合理的源头控制方案,为该地区的城市空气质量管理规划提供参考。将有空气质量数据的年份(2014-2020 年)分为三个时期,即弱控制期(WCP:2014-2017 年)、强控制期(ECP:2018-2019 年)和 COVID-19 期(CDP:2020 年)。每年的 PM2.5、PM10、二氧化硫和氮氧化物的年排放量在 WCP 期间分别变化了 62∼46μg-m-3、103∼76μg-m-3、27∼22μg-m-3 和 46∼41μg-m-3;在 ECP 期间,排放量分别降至 37 μg-m-3、69 μg-m-3、11 μg-m-3 和 34 μg-m-3;在 CDP 期间,排放量分别降至 33 μg-m-3、61 μg-m-3、11 μg-m-3 和 33 μg-m-3,达到中国《环境空气质量标准》(二级,35 μg-m-3、70 μg-m-3、60 μg-m-3 和 50 μg-m-3)的限值。PM2.5 和 PM10 指数超标主要出现在深秋(10 月和 11 月)和隆冬(1 月和 2 月)。根据对时空空气质量和当地高分辨率排放清单的综合数据分析,秸秆焚烧、固定燃烧(尤其是燃煤)和汽车尾气排放是深秋季节的主要污染源,而连续的不利气象条件则是冬季中期严重污染日的主要因素。此外,根据混合单粒子拉格朗日综合轨迹(HYSPLIT)模型,四平市的城市空气质量还受到来自西北部(吉林省松原市)、东北部(吉林省长春市)和南部(辽宁省铁岭市)污染物传输的影响。在 ECP 和 CDP 期间,秋季实施了严格的秸秆焚烧政策,与 WCP 相比,空气质量显著改善,空气质量指数降低了 31.58%。然而,计划中的焚烧政策并未得到很好的执行,导致中度或重度污染天数增多。以 2017 年为基准年,模拟了设置可行的源头控制措施(即秸秆焚烧控制、城市化地区淘汰小锅炉、错峰供暖措施以及城市化地区和郊区周边居民散煤燃烧减少 50%)的情景,预计 PM2.5 和 PM10 浓度下降超过 29.79%,达到城市空气质量标准。这项研究强调了将禁燃区、限燃区的秸秆焚烧监管与城市化地区周边居民燃煤替代相结合对改善寒冷地区空气质量的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信