Reform of the European electricity market: Should we prefer a price based on a weighted average of marginal costs with cross-subsidies?

Q1 Social Sciences
Jacques Percebois , Stanislas Pommeret
{"title":"Reform of the European electricity market: Should we prefer a price based on a weighted average of marginal costs with cross-subsidies?","authors":"Jacques Percebois ,&nbsp;Stanislas Pommeret","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2023.107364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>On the wholesale electricity market, the equilibrium price is set each hour on the basis of the marginal cost of the last power plant called, which is a gas-fired power plant a large part of the time in Europe. The surge in gas prices since the end of 2021 therefore largely explains the rise in the price of electricity. This paper analyses the reform projects proposed within the European Union to curb this surge in wholesale prices. It proposes then to reform the system by opting for pricing based on the weighted average hourly marginal costs, with financial compensation for power plants whose marginal cost is higher than this average. The quantitative study is conducted over the period January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022 using ENTSOE hourly data. By implementing a compensation framework founded on average marginal costs, the market price experiences a significant decline, resulting in typically negative residual profits. Consequently, the fixed costs associated with the power plant fleet necessitate funding through the capacity market. This approach would enable French electricity consumers to align their payments with the structure of the national electricity fleet, specifically reflecting the average costs of power stations characterized by substantial fixed costs, such as nuclear facilities. The adoption of this proposed system is poised to expedite the energy transition toward a low-carbon economy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electricity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619023001318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On the wholesale electricity market, the equilibrium price is set each hour on the basis of the marginal cost of the last power plant called, which is a gas-fired power plant a large part of the time in Europe. The surge in gas prices since the end of 2021 therefore largely explains the rise in the price of electricity. This paper analyses the reform projects proposed within the European Union to curb this surge in wholesale prices. It proposes then to reform the system by opting for pricing based on the weighted average hourly marginal costs, with financial compensation for power plants whose marginal cost is higher than this average. The quantitative study is conducted over the period January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022 using ENTSOE hourly data. By implementing a compensation framework founded on average marginal costs, the market price experiences a significant decline, resulting in typically negative residual profits. Consequently, the fixed costs associated with the power plant fleet necessitate funding through the capacity market. This approach would enable French electricity consumers to align their payments with the structure of the national electricity fleet, specifically reflecting the average costs of power stations characterized by substantial fixed costs, such as nuclear facilities. The adoption of this proposed system is poised to expedite the energy transition toward a low-carbon economy.

欧洲电力市场改革:我们是否应该选择基于边际成本加权平均值的价格,并进行交叉补贴?
在电力批发市场上,每小时的平衡价格是根据最后一家发电厂的边际成本确定的,而在欧洲,最后一家发电厂在很大程度上是燃气发电厂。因此,2021 年底以来天然气价格的飙升在很大程度上解释了电价的上涨。本文分析了欧盟内部为抑制批发价格飙升而提出的改革项目。它建议改革电力系统,选择基于每小时边际成本加权平均值的定价方式,并对边际成本高于该平均值的发电厂进行经济补偿。定量研究使用 ENTSOE 的小时数据,时间跨度为 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日。通过实施以平均边际成本为基础的补偿框架,市场价格出现大幅下降,导致剩余利润通常为负值。因此,与发电厂相关的固定成本必须通过容量市场来解决。这种方法将使法国电力消费者的支付与国家电力机组的结构相一致,特别是反映出核电设施等固定成本较高的发电站的平均成本。这一拟议系统的采用将加速向低碳经济的能源转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electricity Journal
Electricity Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Electricity Journal is the leading journal in electric power policy. The journal deals primarily with fuel diversity and the energy mix needed for optimal energy market performance, and therefore covers the full spectrum of energy, from coal, nuclear, natural gas and oil, to renewable energy sources including hydro, solar, geothermal and wind power. Recently, the journal has been publishing in emerging areas including energy storage, microgrid strategies, dynamic pricing, cyber security, climate change, cap and trade, distributed generation, net metering, transmission and generation market dynamics. The Electricity Journal aims to bring together the most thoughtful and influential thinkers globally from across industry, practitioners, government, policymakers and academia. The Editorial Advisory Board is comprised of electric industry thought leaders who have served as regulators, consultants, litigators, and market advocates. Their collective experience helps ensure that the most relevant and thought-provoking issues are presented to our readers, and helps navigate the emerging shape and design of the electricity/energy industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信