Kids these days and kids those days: Investigating perceptions of children's social skills from 1988 to 2007

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Katherine E. Frye , Christopher J. Anthony , A. Corinne Huggins-Manley , Tina M. Smith-Bonahue
{"title":"Kids these days and kids those days: Investigating perceptions of children's social skills from 1988 to 2007","authors":"Katherine E. Frye ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Anthony ,&nbsp;A. Corinne Huggins-Manley ,&nbsp;Tina M. Smith-Bonahue","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Behavior rating scales<span> are frequently used assessment tools designed to measure social skills. Use of norm-referenced assessments such as behavior rating scales requires examiners and test publishers to consider when norms become obsolete and norm-referenced scores can no longer be validly interpreted. A fundamental factor influencing norm obsolescence regards changes in baseline levels of targeted traits within the population. Yet, limited research exists regarding how social skills may change at a population level over time as measured by established assessment tools. Thus, the present study investigates population trends in social skills of K–12 children as rated by parents, teachers, and students by concordantly linking the Social Skills Rating System (SSRS; </span></span><em>n</em><sub>parent</sub> = 833, <em>n</em><sub>teacher</sub> = 1215, <em>n</em><sub>student</sub> = 4105) and the Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales (SSIS-RS; <em>n</em><sub>parent</sub> = 2400, <em>n</em><sub>teacher</sub> = 750, <em>n</em><sub>student</sub> = 800) using validity samples collected during the development of the SSIS-RS (<em>n</em><sub>parent</sub> = 240, <em>n</em><sub>teacher</sub> = 221, <em>n</em><sub>student</sub> = 224). Analyses evaluated differences between ratings on the standardization data from 1988 and 2007 by informant, sex, grade level, and sex by grade level. After applying linear linking techniques, we conducted a series of statistical comparisons that revealed a general upward trend of ratings for the 2007 sample compared to the 1988 sample, with important differences across sex, grade level, and informant. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of these findings for consideration and assessment of children's social skills.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440523001061","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Behavior rating scales are frequently used assessment tools designed to measure social skills. Use of norm-referenced assessments such as behavior rating scales requires examiners and test publishers to consider when norms become obsolete and norm-referenced scores can no longer be validly interpreted. A fundamental factor influencing norm obsolescence regards changes in baseline levels of targeted traits within the population. Yet, limited research exists regarding how social skills may change at a population level over time as measured by established assessment tools. Thus, the present study investigates population trends in social skills of K–12 children as rated by parents, teachers, and students by concordantly linking the Social Skills Rating System (SSRS; nparent = 833, nteacher = 1215, nstudent = 4105) and the Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales (SSIS-RS; nparent = 2400, nteacher = 750, nstudent = 800) using validity samples collected during the development of the SSIS-RS (nparent = 240, nteacher = 221, nstudent = 224). Analyses evaluated differences between ratings on the standardization data from 1988 and 2007 by informant, sex, grade level, and sex by grade level. After applying linear linking techniques, we conducted a series of statistical comparisons that revealed a general upward trend of ratings for the 2007 sample compared to the 1988 sample, with important differences across sex, grade level, and informant. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of these findings for consideration and assessment of children's social skills.

现在的孩子和过去的孩子调查 1988 年至 2007 年人们对儿童社交技能的看法
行为等级量表是常用的评估工具,旨在测量社交技能。使用行为等级量表等常模参照测评工具,要求考试者和测验出版商考虑常模何时会过时,常模参照分数何时不能再被有效解释。影响常模过时的一个基本因素是人群中目标特质基线水平的变化。然而,关于既定评估工具所测量的人群社会技能随着时间的推移会发生何种变化的研究却十分有限。因此,本研究通过将 "社交技能评级系统"(SSRS)与 "家长、教师和学生对 K-12 阶段儿童社交技能的评价"(SSRS;n家长=833,n教师=1215,n学生=4105)和社交技能改进系统-评分量表(SSIS-RS;n家长=2400,n教师=750,n学生=800),并使用在 SSIS-RS 开发期间收集的有效样本(n家长=240,n教师=221,n学生=224)。分析评估了 1988 年和 2007 年标准化数据中按信息提供者、性别、年级和按年级的性别划分的评分之间的差异。在应用线性连接技术后,我们进行了一系列统计比较,结果显示,与 1988 年的样本相比,2007 年样本的评分总体呈上升趋势,不同性别、年级和信息提供者之间存在重要差异。最后,我们讨论了这些发现对考虑和评估儿童社交能力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of School Psychology
Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信