No Significant Differences in Presepsin Levels According to the Causative Microorganism of Bloodstream Infection.

IF 2.8 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Infection and Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-21 DOI:10.3947/ic.2023.0066
Beomki Lee, Jong Eun Park, Sun Joo Yoon, Chi-Min Park, Nam Yong Lee, Tae Gun Shin, Eun-Suk Kang
{"title":"No Significant Differences in Presepsin Levels According to the Causative Microorganism of Bloodstream Infection.","authors":"Beomki Lee, Jong Eun Park, Sun Joo Yoon, Chi-Min Park, Nam Yong Lee, Tae Gun Shin, Eun-Suk Kang","doi":"10.3947/ic.2023.0066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CD14 recognizes lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and presepsin is a fragment of soluble CD14. Still, it remains uncertain whether Gram-negative bacteria induce higher presepsin levels than other microorganisms. To address this question, this study aimed to analyze presepsin levels based on microorganisms isolated in blood cultures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was a single-center study comprising suspected sepsis patients enrolled from July 2020 to September 2020. A total of 95 patients with a single isolate confirmed in blood culture were analyzed to evaluate if there are any differences in presepsin levels according to microbial isolates. Plasma presepsin level was measured using PATHFAST assay kit and analyzer (LSI Medience Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 26 Gram-positive bacteremia, 65 Gram-negative bacteremia, and 3 fungemia patients with median presepsin levels of 869, 1,439, and 11,951 pg/mL, respectively. Besides, one case of algaemia demonstrated a presepsin level of 1,231 pg/mL. Our results showed no statistically significant difference in presepsin levels among patients with Gram-positive bacteremia, Gram-negative bacteremia, and fungemia. Furthermore, presepsin levels did not differ significantly among bloodstream infections caused by bacteria that were isolated from at least three different patients. In particular, Gram-positive bacteria such as <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> were able to induce presepsin levels comparable to those induced by Gram-negative bacteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated that there were no significant differences in plasma presepsin levels according to microbial isolates in blood culture. The major cause of the variability in presepsin levels during bloodstream infection might be the immunogenicity of each microorganism rather than the presence of LPS in the microorganism.</p>","PeriodicalId":51616,"journal":{"name":"Infection and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"47-56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2023.0066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: CD14 recognizes lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and presepsin is a fragment of soluble CD14. Still, it remains uncertain whether Gram-negative bacteria induce higher presepsin levels than other microorganisms. To address this question, this study aimed to analyze presepsin levels based on microorganisms isolated in blood cultures.

Materials and methods: This study was a single-center study comprising suspected sepsis patients enrolled from July 2020 to September 2020. A total of 95 patients with a single isolate confirmed in blood culture were analyzed to evaluate if there are any differences in presepsin levels according to microbial isolates. Plasma presepsin level was measured using PATHFAST assay kit and analyzer (LSI Medience Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

Results: There were 26 Gram-positive bacteremia, 65 Gram-negative bacteremia, and 3 fungemia patients with median presepsin levels of 869, 1,439, and 11,951 pg/mL, respectively. Besides, one case of algaemia demonstrated a presepsin level of 1,231 pg/mL. Our results showed no statistically significant difference in presepsin levels among patients with Gram-positive bacteremia, Gram-negative bacteremia, and fungemia. Furthermore, presepsin levels did not differ significantly among bloodstream infections caused by bacteria that were isolated from at least three different patients. In particular, Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis were able to induce presepsin levels comparable to those induced by Gram-negative bacteria.

Conclusion: We demonstrated that there were no significant differences in plasma presepsin levels according to microbial isolates in blood culture. The major cause of the variability in presepsin levels during bloodstream infection might be the immunogenicity of each microorganism rather than the presence of LPS in the microorganism.

血流感染的致病微生物不同,前体素水平也无明显差异。
背景:CD14 可识别脂多糖(LPS),而前蛋白酶是可溶性 CD14 的一个片段。然而,革兰氏阴性细菌是否比其他微生物诱导更高水平的前体蛋白仍不确定。为解决这一问题,本研究旨在根据血液培养物中分离出的微生物分析前体素水平:本研究是一项单中心研究,包括 2020 年 7 月至 2020 年 9 月期间入组的疑似败血症患者。共对 95 例经血液培养证实有单一分离菌的患者进行了分析,以评估不同微生物分离菌的前胰蛋白酶水平是否存在差异。使用 PATHFAST 检测试剂盒和分析仪(LSI Medience 公司,日本东京)测量血浆前体素水平:结果:26 例革兰氏阳性菌血症患者、65 例革兰氏阴性菌血症患者和 3 例真菌血症患者的血浆前体素中位数分别为 869、1,439 和 11,951 pg/mL。此外,一例藻血症患者的前胰蛋白酶水平为 1,231 pg/mL。我们的研究结果表明,革兰氏阳性菌血症、革兰氏阴性菌血症和真菌血症患者的前胰蛋白酶水平在统计学上没有明显差异。此外,从至少三名不同患者身上分离出的细菌所引起的血流感染中,前体素水平也没有明显差异。尤其是金黄色葡萄球菌和粪肠球菌等革兰氏阳性菌诱导的前体蛋白水平与革兰氏阴性菌诱导的前体蛋白水平相当:我们的研究表明,血浆中的前体蛋白水平与血液培养中分离出的微生物没有明显差异。血液感染过程中前胰蛋白酶水平变化的主要原因可能是每种微生物的免疫原性,而不是微生物中是否存在 LPS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection and Chemotherapy
Infection and Chemotherapy INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
11.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信