Exploring Reasons for Non-Engagement From a Peer-Led Diversionary Intervention for Veterans in Police Custody.

IF 1.3 4区社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1177/0306624X231219992

Arun Sondhi, Linda Maguire, Alessandro Leidi, Claire Weston

{"title":"Exploring Reasons for Non-Engagement From a Peer-Led Diversionary Intervention for Veterans in Police Custody.","authors":"Arun Sondhi, Linda Maguire, Alessandro Leidi, Claire Weston","doi":"10.1177/0306624X231219992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"UK veterans with complex needs arrested in police custody can access support through pre-charge diversion into treatment and ancillary services. We consider why veterans in police custody disengaged from a peer-led criminal justice diversionary support service in one UK region that adopted a continuous case management approach. Seven hundred and fifty-seven veterans were assessed to have high levels of comorbid health needs and socio-economic harms, with one-quarter (26.7%, n = 202) subsequently disengaging from the service. A logistic regression model using Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations identified that veterans of a younger age, no-fixed-abode, a history of incarceration, and those from a Royal Navy background were likelier to disengage from the intervention. We conclude that this peer-based diversionary model has some efficacy in maintaining the engagement of a highly complex, comorbid segment of criminally-justice-exposed UK military veterans. The perceived benefits of an integrated peer-based model predicated on continuous case-management techniques are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48041,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology","volume":" ","pages":"306624X231219992"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X231219992","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

UK veterans with complex needs arrested in police custody can access support through pre-charge diversion into treatment and ancillary services. We consider why veterans in police custody disengaged from a peer-led criminal justice diversionary support service in one UK region that adopted a continuous case management approach. Seven hundred and fifty-seven veterans were assessed to have high levels of comorbid health needs and socio-economic harms, with one-quarter (26.7%, n = 202) subsequently disengaging from the service. A logistic regression model using Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations identified that veterans of a younger age, no-fixed-abode, a history of incarceration, and those from a Royal Navy background were likelier to disengage from the intervention. We conclude that this peer-based diversionary model has some efficacy in maintaining the engagement of a highly complex, comorbid segment of criminally-justice-exposed UK military veterans. The perceived benefits of an integrated peer-based model predicated on continuous case-management techniques are discussed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

探索不参与针对被警方拘留的退伍军人的同伴引导分流干预措施的原因。

被警方拘留的英国退伍军人有复杂的需求，他们可以通过起诉前转送治疗和辅助服务获得支持。在英国的一个地区，由同龄人主导的刑事司法转送支持服务采用持续的个案管理方法，我们研究了被警方拘留的退伍军人为何会脱离该服务。757 名退伍军人被评估为具有高度的合并健康需求和社会经济危害，其中四分之一（26.7%，n = 202）随后脱离了服务。使用链式方程多变量推算法建立的逻辑回归模型发现，年龄较小、无固定居所、有监禁史以及有皇家海军背景的退伍军人更有可能脱离干预。我们的结论是，这种以同伴为基础的分流模式在维持英国退伍军人中高度复杂、有犯罪倾向的群体的参与方面具有一定的功效。我们还讨论了以持续的个案管理技术为基础的同伴为基础的综合模式的明显优势。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology Multiple-

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

6.70%

发文量

164

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Press/Politics is an interdisciplinary journal for the analysis and discussion of the role of the press and politics in a globalized world. The Journal is interested in theoretical and empirical research on the linkages between the news media and political processes and actors. Special attention is given to the following subjects: the press and political institutions (e.g. the state, government, political parties, social movements, unions, interest groups, business), the politics of media coverage of social and cultural issues (e.g. race, language, health, environment, gender, nationhood, migration, labor), the dynamics and effects of political communication.