Early Predictors of Fistula Formation Following Head and Neck Reconstruction.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1055/a-2238-7591
Daisuke Atomura, Takeo Osaki, Shigemichi Iwae, Shunsuke Sakakibara
{"title":"Early Predictors of Fistula Formation Following Head and Neck Reconstruction.","authors":"Daisuke Atomura, Takeo Osaki, Shigemichi Iwae, Shunsuke Sakakibara","doi":"10.1055/a-2238-7591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Salivary fistula formation is a common and serious complication following head and neck reconstruction. Because it can cause delayed wound healing and infection and carotid artery rupture in severe cases, hence, early detection and treatment are crucial. This study was designed to identify early predictors of postoperative fistula formation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction between 2015 and 2022. Body temperature, serum white blood cell (WBC) count, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were assessed until postoperative day (POD) 14 and compared between patients with and without fistula.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> In this study, 200 patients were included. No significant differences in body temperature and WBC count were observed between the two groups during the entire study period. CRP levels after POD2 were higher in the fistula group than in the without fistula group. From the receiver operating characteristic curves comparing the two groups, the best cutoff level for CRP was 6.27 mg/dL from POD7 to POD8, with 77.1% sensitivity, 69.8% specificity, and 90.1% negative predictive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> CRP is a valuable predictor of fistula formation following head and neck reconstruction. The course of CRP levels in patients with fistulas remains consistently elevated compared to patients without fistulas, and it is particularly useful for the exclusion diagnosis of fistula.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":"466-472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2238-7591","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Salivary fistula formation is a common and serious complication following head and neck reconstruction. Because it can cause delayed wound healing and infection and carotid artery rupture in severe cases, hence, early detection and treatment are crucial. This study was designed to identify early predictors of postoperative fistula formation.

Methods:  We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction between 2015 and 2022. Body temperature, serum white blood cell (WBC) count, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were assessed until postoperative day (POD) 14 and compared between patients with and without fistula.

Results:  In this study, 200 patients were included. No significant differences in body temperature and WBC count were observed between the two groups during the entire study period. CRP levels after POD2 were higher in the fistula group than in the without fistula group. From the receiver operating characteristic curves comparing the two groups, the best cutoff level for CRP was 6.27 mg/dL from POD7 to POD8, with 77.1% sensitivity, 69.8% specificity, and 90.1% negative predictive value.

Conclusion:  CRP is a valuable predictor of fistula formation following head and neck reconstruction. The course of CRP levels in patients with fistulas remains consistently elevated compared to patients without fistulas, and it is particularly useful for the exclusion diagnosis of fistula.

头颈部重建术后瘘管形成的早期预测因素。
背景:涎瘘形成是头颈部整形术后常见的严重并发症。由于涎瘘可导致伤口延迟愈合和感染,严重者可导致颈动脉破裂,因此早期发现和治疗至关重要。本研究旨在确定术后瘘管形成的早期预测因素:我们对2015年至2022年间接受头颈部重建手术的患者进行了回顾性分析。评估体温、血清白细胞(WBC)计数和血清C反应蛋白(CRP)水平,直至术后第14天(POD),并对有瘘管和无瘘管的患者进行比较:本研究共纳入 200 名患者。在整个研究期间,两组患者的体温和白细胞计数无明显差异。瘘管组 POD2 后的 CRP 水平高于无瘘管组。从两组比较的接收器操作特征曲线来看,POD7 至 POD8 的 CRP 最佳临界值为 6.27 mg/dL,灵敏度为 77.1%,特异度为 69.8%,阴性预测值为 90.1%:结论:CRP 是预测头颈部重建术后瘘管形成的重要指标。结论:CRP 是预测头颈部重建术后瘘管形成的重要指标,与无瘘管患者相比,瘘管患者的 CRP 水平持续升高,尤其适用于瘘管的排除性诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信